Message boards : Number crunching : @Markku -please stop creating new WU s
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Guido Alexander Waldenmeier

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 321
Credit: 10,607
RAC: 0
Message 4070 - Posted: 22 Oct 2004, 7:09:46 UTC

its to much for 5000 user.The big ons tunescan
take to much time on small computer like pentium 3
more then 20 hours.the daily limit its to great for this.they download more wu at day ,they can work in the deathtime.it takes to long for valiation.when the people cruch day by day and takes to long to garanted ,a lot of frustration comeing up.i knoww it is a lot of work to do
this is a problem ;-(
rutsch mer doch dr Buckel na schofseggel
ID: 4070 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile sysfried

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 04
Posts: 282
Credit: 1,415,417
RAC: 0
Message 4073 - Posted: 22 Oct 2004, 7:36:55 UTC - in response to Message 4070.  

I don't agree with Guido.

I think it's absolutely necessary to have more wu's available than people are able to crunch. This paves the way for new members to add their CPU Power. (I have 2 friends waiting to join LHC).

:-)

and Guido... I don't like your signature either. But that's propably just me.

> its to much for 5000 user.The big ons tunescan
> take to much time on small computer like pentium 3
> more then 20 hours.the daily limit its to great for this.they download more wu
> at day ,they can work in the deathtime.it takes to long for valiation.when the
> people cruch day by day and takes to long to garanted ,a lot of frustration
> comeing up.i knoww it is a lot of work to do
> this is a problem ;-(
> rutsch mer doch dr Buckel na schofseggel
>
ID: 4073 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
STE\/E

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 352
Credit: 1,393,150
RAC: 0
Message 4076 - Posted: 22 Oct 2004, 7:56:08 UTC
Last modified: 22 Oct 2004, 7:57:48 UTC

pppfffftttt...Not all of us are still running Cave Man Computers Guido, first you complain there is not enough WU's now you complain theres to many WU's...

Why don't you let the Dev's decide if theres too many WU's for us to handle. From looking through a lot of peoples Computer Lists many of them could increase the amount of Resources they have for LHC easily.

If they increase the User Base then you'll be complaining theres not enough WU's again ...




ID: 4076 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Gaspode the UnDressed

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 04
Posts: 506
Credit: 118,619
RAC: 0
Message 4078 - Posted: 22 Oct 2004, 8:33:52 UTC

Guido, if you can't say something sensible, don't say anything at all.


Giskard - the first telepathic robot.


ID: 4078 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Yeti
Volunteer moderator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 453
Credit: 193,569,815
RAC: 10,128
Message 4080 - Posted: 22 Oct 2004, 8:42:35 UTC

Hey Guys,

Guido always must have something to criticize. The only way is to ignore him / his posts ;-)

If you follow up his posts over all the projects, you get the impression, he thinks, that the dc-projects are only to satisfy guido, but not to satisfy the needs of the projects.



Supporting BOINC, because it is really a great concept !
ID: 4080 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Guido Alexander Waldenmeier

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 321
Credit: 10,607
RAC: 0
Message 4083 - Posted: 22 Oct 2004, 9:20:48 UTC

this is one of the problems
if i translate to english it not exact that what i will say
sorry i have only the -farmer-caribbian-english- ;-)
but write in english the RULES say
have a nice day all!
and thank you all for the FISH !
rutsch mer doch dr Buckel na schofseggel
ID: 4083 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Michael Berger

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 126
Credit: 49,653
RAC: 0
Message 4085 - Posted: 22 Oct 2004, 10:16:35 UTC - in response to Message 4076.  
Last modified: 21 Nov 2004, 12:21:22 UTC

ID: 4085 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
STE\/E

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 352
Credit: 1,393,150
RAC: 0
Message 4090 - Posted: 22 Oct 2004, 10:50:19 UTC - in response to Message 4085.  
Last modified: 22 Oct 2004, 10:50:36 UTC

> > pppfffftttt...Not all of us are still running Cave Man Computers...edit
>
> You're right PoorBoy, some are running ridiculously overpriced toys that only
> SpoiledRichKids buy. They don't have a clue about computers and think that all
> you have to do to achieve high performance in a workstation is to throw money
> at it.
>
> [url=http://lhcathome.cern.ch/team_display.php?teamid=45]
==========

You must be talking about your Computers then Michael since I see you have at least 3 top of the line PC's ...
ID: 4090 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Michael Berger

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 126
Credit: 49,653
RAC: 0
Message 4093 - Posted: 22 Oct 2004, 11:03:56 UTC - in response to Message 4090.  
Last modified: 21 Nov 2004, 12:21:01 UTC

ID: 4093 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Guido Alexander Waldenmeier

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 321
Credit: 10,607
RAC: 0
Message 4094 - Posted: 22 Oct 2004, 11:05:16 UTC

go michael go ;-)))
rutsch mer doch dr Buckel na schofseggel
ID: 4094 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Siran d'Vel'nahr

Send message
Joined: 28 Sep 04
Posts: 16
Credit: 47,188
RAC: 0
Message 4172 - Posted: 23 Oct 2004, 16:21:46 UTC - in response to Message 4073.  

> I don't agree with Guido.
>
> I think it's absolutely necessary to have more wu's available than people are
> able to crunch. This paves the way for new members to add their CPU Power. (I
> have 2 friends waiting to join LHC).
>
> :-)
>
> and Guido... I don't like your signature either. But that's propably just me.
>
> > rutsch mer doch dr Buckel na schofseggel
> >
>

You think this is bad, you should see what he's been up to on the SETI site. He's been pissing off a lot of other users there, including me.

L8R....

---



Rick A. - BOINCing right along now.... It can only get better....
"There is no fate except that which we create for ourselves."
ID: 4172 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
William Smith

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 04
Posts: 9
Credit: 4,507
RAC: 0
Message 4175 - Posted: 23 Oct 2004, 16:31:17 UTC - in response to Message 4070.  

> its to much for 5000 user.The big ons tunescan
> take to much time on small computer like pentium 3
> more then 20 hours.the daily limit its to great for this.they download more wu
> at day ,they can work in the deathtime.it takes to long for valiation.when the
> people cruch day by day and takes to long to garanted ,a lot of frustration
> comeing up.i knoww it is a lot of work to do
> this is a problem ;-(
> rutsch mer doch dr Buckel na schofseggel
>
I have a 400 running on LHC as well as 2GHZ, and i don't care when i get credit granted as it will some day. Also every MHZ counts.
ID: 4175 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Blank Reg

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 04
Posts: 49
Credit: 25,253
RAC: 0
Message 4195 - Posted: 23 Oct 2004, 19:58:34 UTC - in response to Message 4070.  

> its to much for 5000 user.The big ons tunescan
> take to much time on small computer like pentium 3
> more then 20 hours.the daily limit its to great for this.they download more wu
> at day ,they can work in the deathtime.it takes to long for valiation.when the
> people cruch day by day and takes to long to garanted ,a lot of frustration
> comeing up.i knoww it is a lot of work to do
> this is a problem ;-(
> rutsch mer doch dr Buckel na schofseggel
>


HEy Guido you old troll master, I am working very hard to become just like you. If you have to much work to do, just change your, connect to, date to a lower number and then you can do all the work and shut the f@@k up...........
ID: 4195 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : @Markku -please stop creating new WU s


©2024 CERN