Message boards :
Theory Application :
New Version v300.03
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 20 Jun 14 Posts: 372 Credit: 238,712 RAC: 0 |
This new version will consider failed jobs as successful from a BOINC perspective. This means that the error output will be returned to the MCPlots server for further analysis and they will not be re-run on other hosts. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jun 08 Posts: 2386 Credit: 222,999,400 RAC: 136,089 |
This task failed and was sent again: https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=259207127 195 (0x000000C3) EXIT_CHILD_FAILED 10:38:30 CET +01:00 2020-01-14: cranky-0.0.29: [INFO] Running Container 'runc'. 10:38:32 CET +01:00 2020-01-14: cranky-0.0.29: [INFO] ===> [runRivet] Tue Jan 14 09:38:30 UTC 2020 [boinc ppbar mb-inelastic 500 - - pythia8 8.301 tune-AU2ct10 100000 14] 10:38:58 CET +01:00 2020-01-14: cranky-0.0.29: [ERROR] Container 'runc' terminated with status code 1. 10:38:59 (83383): cranky exited; CPU time 10.353307 10:38:59 (83383): app exit status: 0xce 10:38:59 (83383): called boinc_finish(195) |
Send message Joined: 20 Jun 14 Posts: 372 Credit: 238,712 RAC: 0 |
Thanks. I forgot to updated the native version. Done now. |
Send message Joined: 15 Jun 08 Posts: 2386 Credit: 222,999,400 RAC: 136,089 |
Thanks. Looks like it works now. https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=259228178 https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=259228031 Output example: 13:22:14 CET +01:00 2020-01-14: cranky-0.0.30: [INFO] Running Container 'runc'. 13:22:16 CET +01:00 2020-01-14: cranky-0.0.30: [INFO] ===> [runRivet] Tue Jan 14 12:22:15 UTC 2020 [boinc ppbar mb-inelastic 1960 - - pythia8 8.301 tune-2m 100000 14] 13:22:44 CET +01:00 2020-01-14: cranky-0.0.30: [INFO] Container 'runc' finished with status code 1. 13:22:44 CET +01:00 2020-01-14: cranky-0.0.30: [INFO] Preparing output. 13:22:45 (31177): cranky exited; CPU time 10.676736 13:22:45 (31177): called boinc_finish(0) |
Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 281 Credit: 11,859,285 RAC: 1 |
Has anything else been changed in how these communicate between the VM, Boinc and VBox? Starting since versions 300.03/5.19 I have had quite a few powered-off VMs left in VBox on job completion and corresponding ghost images in Virtual Media Manager, all requiring manual deletion. Just Windows, I think. |
Send message Joined: 14 Jan 10 Posts: 1268 Credit: 8,421,637 RAC: 1,939 |
Nothing changed in the communications between VBox and BOINC. I suppose it's due to the high unsuccessful rate of the newly started revision 2363: Successful: 34661 Unsuccessful: 29649 |
Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 281 Credit: 11,859,285 RAC: 1 |
Thanks. CP Just thought it strange that both Windows hosts had 5 or more each, undeleted VMs. Since manually deleting all of those, I have not had any others fail to tidy up after themselves on departure so whatever it was has resolved itself. |
©2024 CERN