Message boards : Sixtrack Application : Very long Tasks
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Profile ritterm
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 08
Posts: 93
Credit: 5,160,246
RAC: 0
Message 39248 - Posted: 3 Jul 2019, 17:32:17 UTC

ID: 39248 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
computezrmle
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 15 Jun 08
Posts: 1144
Credit: 56,282,873
RAC: 96,508
Message 39250 - Posted: 3 Jul 2019, 17:35:58 UTC - in response to Message 39248.  

ID: 39250 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Alessio Mereghetti
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 29 Feb 16
Posts: 146
Credit: 1,881,581
RAC: 4,479
Message 39260 - Posted: 4 Jul 2019, 7:30:28 UTC - in response to Message 39246.  


Aren't those long task more suited to GPU's?

Well, GPUs are suitable for calculations that can be run in parallel. That could be the case for SixTrack only if the number of particles is kept constant with time, which implies all stable particles. But once you start hitting unstable regions of the phase space, you should switch back to regular CPUs.
Knowing this point a-priori would imply also knowing the dynamic aperture, which is exactly what we are looking at...
Anyway, the effort to go to GPUs is on-going, but that requires deep re-factoring of the code. It is not in our top-priority, but it is steadily progressing - no clear ETA, though...


Whoa...

Workunit 117930579

Workunit 117930567

Workunit 117930673

Great job, many many thanks!
ID: 39260 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile ritterm
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 May 08
Posts: 93
Credit: 5,160,246
RAC: 0
Message 39280 - Posted: 4 Jul 2019, 18:37:10 UTC - in response to Message 39260.  
Last modified: 4 Jul 2019, 18:37:33 UTC

Whoa...

Workunit 117930579

Workunit 117930567

Workunit 117930673

Great job, many many thanks!

Always a pleasure to grind it out for my favorite project... :-)
ID: 39280 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
maeax

Send message
Joined: 2 May 07
Posts: 748
Credit: 27,663,964
RAC: 40,946
Message 40107 - Posted: 10 Oct 2019, 3:55:36 UTC

This Sixtrack(avx)-248217116 is shown with a runtime of more than 2 days for the moment (10-Time greater than normal)
https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/workunit.php?wuid=124082860
ID: 40107 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile MAGIC Quantum Mechanic
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Oct 04
Posts: 853
Credit: 37,649,640
RAC: 25,262
Message 40109 - Posted: 10 Oct 2019, 7:02:41 UTC - in response to Message 40107.  

This Sixtrack(avx)-248217116 is shown with a runtime of more than 2 days for the moment (10-Time greater than normal)
https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/workunit.php?wuid=124082860


Those are the workspace1_HEL_Qp Sixtrack tasks taking close to 55 hours and I had 2 that just finished as Validate state - Workunit error - check skipped

So after a few of those I decided against wasting 55 hours and just abort them when I see them after a reload of tasks.
( I have just one of those that only ran 16 hours but have the same Validate state)


https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=247499200
https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=247174576
https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=247174715

This one was instead a Exit status 196 (0x000000C4) EXIT_DISK_LIMIT_EXCEEDED Run time 16 hours 45 min 54 sec
https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=247556609
ID: 40109 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Alessio Mereghetti
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 29 Feb 16
Posts: 146
Credit: 1,881,581
RAC: 4,479
Message 40115 - Posted: 10 Oct 2019, 10:49:54 UTC - in response to Message 40109.  

The issue with those tasks has been addressed here:
https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/forum_thread.php?id=4690

We had a problem with the setting up of a bunch of simulations with 1^7 turns, and a log file was eating up all the disk quota.
The user was not aware that sixtrack was producing that log file, and how to update the request.
Hence, I have decided to manually attribute credit to those tasks based on the CPU time via the --credit_from_runtime option of the BOINC validator.
I should have also given credit to your tasks, but I had a malformed query to the DB - now everything should be properly set, and you should see credit to those tasks.

Thanks a lot in advance,
Happy cruncing,
A.
ID: 40115 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile MAGIC Quantum Mechanic
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Oct 04
Posts: 853
Credit: 37,649,640
RAC: 25,262
Message 40125 - Posted: 11 Oct 2019, 10:46:32 UTC - in response to Message 40115.  

The issue with those tasks has been addressed here:
https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/forum_thread.php?id=4690

We had a problem with the setting up of a bunch of simulations with 1^7 turns, and a log file was eating up all the disk quota.
The user was not aware that sixtrack was producing that log file, and how to update the request.
Hence, I have decided to manually attribute credit to those tasks based on the CPU time via the --credit_from_runtime option of the BOINC validator.
I should have also given credit to your tasks, but I had a malformed query to the DB - now everything should be properly set, and you should see credit to those tasks.

Thanks a lot in advance,
Happy cruncing,
A.


Thanks Alessio,
Glad I stopped by here again just now to see that was taken care off.

I have no problem with running long tasks as long as they end up being used after they are finished.
(especially over 55 hours each)

- Samson
ID: 40125 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Sixtrack Application : Very long Tasks


©2019 CERN