Message boards : Number crunching : Error - Work bigger than max
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Colin Porter

Send message
Joined: 14 Jul 05
Posts: 35
Credit: 71,636
RAC: 0
Message 17283 - Posted: 6 Jul 2007, 19:12:59 UTC
Last modified: 6 Jul 2007, 19:28:26 UTC

Anyone else got this message?

Anyone know what it means?

06/07/2007 19:06:35|lhcathome|Requesting 61085 seconds of new work
06/07/2007 19:06:41|lhcathome|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505]
06/07/2007 19:06:41|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 7 sec
06/07/2007 19:06:41|lhcathome|Reason: requested by project
06/07/2007 19:06:41|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 2 min 11 sec
06/07/2007 19:06:41|lhcathome|Reason: no work from project
06/07/2007 19:08:53||[error] Proposed work request 18783707.874775 bigger than max 61084.800000
06/07/2007 19:08:53|lhcathome|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work
06/07/2007 19:08:53|lhcathome|Requesting 61085 seconds of new work
06/07/2007 19:08:58|lhcathome|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505]
06/07/2007 19:08:58|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 7 sec
06/07/2007 19:08:58|lhcathome|Reason: requested by project
06/07/2007 19:08:58|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 16 min 31 sec
06/07/2007 19:08:58|lhcathome|Reason: no work from project
06/07/2007 19:25:30||[error] Proposed work request 22213547.242880 bigger than max 61084.800000
06/07/2007 19:25:31|lhcathome|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work
06/07/2007 19:25:31|lhcathome|Requesting 61085 seconds of new work
06/07/2007 19:25:36|lhcathome|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505]
06/07/2007 19:25:36|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 7 sec
06/07/2007 19:25:36|lhcathome|Reason: requested by project
06/07/2007 19:25:36|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 44 min 31 sec
06/07/2007 19:25:36|lhcathome|Reason: no work from project

I notice that the front page said "low on work" did LHC try to send some?
ID: 17283 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Keck_Komputers

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 04
Posts: 275
Credit: 2,652,452
RAC: 0
Message 17286 - Posted: 6 Jul 2007, 20:10:14 UTC

Sometimes the client miscalculates how much work to request. Since the problem in the calculation was difficult to find an external limit was put in. You are just seeing that limit doing it's job.
BOINC WIKI

BOINCing since 2002/12/8
ID: 17286 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Colin Porter

Send message
Joined: 14 Jul 05
Posts: 35
Credit: 71,636
RAC: 0
Message 17287 - Posted: 6 Jul 2007, 20:29:29 UTC - in response to Message 17286.  

Sometimes the client miscalculates how much work to request. Since the problem in the calculation was difficult to find an external limit was put in. You are just seeing that limit doing it's job.


Thanks for that. Just never seen that kind of message before and with the front page saying "Low on work" instead of "No work" wondered what was going on.

It's not the speed, but the quality - Until I get a faster computer.
ID: 17287 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Yeti
Volunteer moderator
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 453
Credit: 193,576,736
RAC: 1,011
Message 17487 - Posted: 21 Jul 2007, 13:08:00 UTC

It would be interesting to here something about how this max is calculated




Supporting BOINC, a great concept !
ID: 17487 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Error - Work bigger than max


©2024 CERN