Message boards :
Number crunching :
Markku...It's still not working.
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 309 Credit: 715,258 RAC: 0 |
22.2.2005 20:00 UTC The new keys are now properly signed. Sixtrack version 4.64 for windows is also released. The only change is that all the related files are now signed so using BOINC core client v4.22 and newer should work. ----------------------- About 12 hrs later.... 23/02/2005 9:37:57 PM||Insufficient work; requesting more 23/02/2005 9:37:57 PM|LHC@home|Requesting 345600.00 seconds of work 23/02/2005 9:37:57 PM|LHC@home|Sending request to scheduler: http://lhcathome-sched1.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi 23/02/2005 9:38:02 PM|LHC@home|Scheduler RPC to http://lhcathome-sched1.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi succeeded 23/02/2005 9:38:03 PM|LHC@home|Started download of sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe 23/02/2005 9:38:03 PM|LHC@home|Started download of bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Finished download of bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Throughput 8986 bytes/sec 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Started download of courier_16_bold_1.01_.tga 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|signature verification error for bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Checksum or signature error for bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-58s14_16545_1_sixvf_2521_1 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-59s10_12575_1_sixvf_2531_1 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-59s12_14530_1_sixvf_2532_1 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-59s12_14575_1_sixvf_2533_2 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-59s14_16515_1_sixvf_2534_2 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-59s14_16530_1_sixvf_2535_1 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-59s14_16545_1_sixvf_2536_1 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-58s18_20515_1_sixvf_2525_2 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-59s14_16560_1_sixvf_2537_1 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-59s16_18515_1_sixvf_2538_1 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc94-57s10_12515_1_sixvf_2626_2 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc94-57s10_12530_1_sixvf_2627_2 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-59s16_18530_1_sixvf_2539_1 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-59s18_20515_1_sixvf_2540_1 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-59s18_20530_1_sixvf_2541_1 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc95-60s8_10530_1_sixvf_2542_1 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) 23/02/2005 9:38:10 PM|LHC@home|Unrecoverable error for result v64lhc94-57s16_18515_1_sixvf_2635_2 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: bottomOverlay_1.02_.tga -120 signature verification error) . . . . 23/02/2005 9:38:11 PM|LHC@home|Deferring communication with project for 3 hours, 30 minutes, and 11 seconds 23/02/2005 9:38:20 PM|LHC@home|Finished download of courier_16_bold_1.01_.tga 23/02/2005 9:38:20 PM|LHC@home|Throughput 1344 bytes/sec 23/02/2005 9:38:20 PM|LHC@home|Started download of courier_16_regular_1.01_.tga 23/02/2005 9:38:20 PM|LHC@home|signature verification error for courier_16_bold_1.01_.tga 23/02/2005 9:38:20 PM|LHC@home|Checksum or signature error for courier_16_bold_1.01_.tga 23/02/2005 9:38:31 PM|LHC@home|Finished download of courier_16_regular_1.01_.tga 23/02/2005 9:38:31 PM|LHC@home|Throughput 1978 bytes/sec 23/02/2005 9:38:31 PM|LHC@home|Started download of courier_24_bold_1.01_.tga 23/02/2005 9:38:31 PM|LHC@home|signature verification error for courier_16_regular_1.01_.tga 23/02/2005 9:38:31 PM|LHC@home|Checksum or signature error for courier_16_regular_1.01_.tga I won't paste the rest.... I'm using BOINC V4.23 on XP. Paul. The Final Front Ear. |
Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 34 Credit: 199,100 RAC: 0 |
Your BOINC was still trying to download the Sixtrack 4.63 (the one that won't work with BOINC 4.2x). The Sixtrack 4.64 will probably only come with the WU they said they were releasing today. Professor Desty Nova Researching Karma the Hard Way |
Send message Joined: 17 Sep 04 Posts: 103 Credit: 38,543 RAC: 0 |
thank you for the info. I was having the same problems and was going to post a question about it. I guess I don't have to now. :) Jim > Your BOINC was still trying to download the Sixtrack 4.63 (the one that won't > work with BOINC 4.2x). The Sixtrack 4.64 will probably only come with the WU > they said they were releasing today. > |
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 6 Credit: 42,158 RAC: 0 |
> Your BOINC was still trying to download the Sixtrack 4.63 (the one that won't > work with BOINC 4.2x). The Sixtrack 4.64 will probably only come with the WU > they said they were releasing today. > Well now, they have created some more WUs now, but I'm still getting the old client: LHC@home - 2005-02-23 14:10:50 - Started download of sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe <br><img src="http://curly-brackets.org/boincstats/counter_big.php?project=lhc&id=1549&style=23"><br> Plan to join a team? - Consider <a href="http://www.boincsynergy.com">BOINC Synergy</a> |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 34 Credit: 19,096 RAC: 0 |
> Well now, they have created some more WUs now, but I'm still getting the old > client: > > LHC@home - 2005-02-23 14:10:50 - Started download of > sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe The old application will continue to try and download as long as there's work units created to be crunched with that application. Once the queue sends all of the older work units out, the new ones will start. Click image for more details. |
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 6 Credit: 42,158 RAC: 0 |
> > The old application will continue to try and download as long as there's work > units created to be crunched with that application. Once the queue sends all > of the older work units out, the new ones will start. > Yes I was assuming that, but they said 'no work' all a.m. and then they came up with a bunch of WUs and it would still d/l the old client...... <br><img src="http://curly-brackets.org/boincstats/counter_big.php?project=lhc&id=1549&style=23"><br> Plan to join a team? - Consider <a href="http://www.boincsynergy.com">BOINC Synergy</a> |
Send message Joined: 17 Sep 04 Posts: 99 Credit: 30,738,202 RAC: 7,872 |
> > Well now, they have created some more WUs now, but I'm still getting the > old > > client: > > > > LHC@home - 2005-02-23 14:10:50 - Started download of > > sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe > > The old application will continue to try and download as long as there's work > units created to be crunched with that application. Once the queue sends all > of the older work units out, the new ones will start. > Any idea on timing? Today, tomorrow, next week....? It is frustrating to keep getting the same error messages again and again, and knowledge of when this might be resolved would help. Thanks! Regards, Bob P. |
Send message Joined: 23 Oct 04 Posts: 358 Credit: 1,439,205 RAC: 0 |
I think this "old" WU's (sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe) are resent WU's from the stormy restart, where near everybody had to detach / attach.! So it seems That they who have troubles yet must wait until the new sixtrack_4.64_windows_intelx86.exe - release, or downgrade to CC 4.19. For me it is working fine now (both machine(one with CC 4.62 and the other with CC 4.19) have the daily quota to crunch)! I have discovered to predict if WU will take the full run or if it will leave the simulation by error (when particles colide or leaving the colider-area). If there is an interest, I will post my expiriences. greetz from Switzerland littleBouncer [BTW @ {CurlY BracketS}]Where do you come from; I'm from Winterthur (I can also speak french (better than english)). |
Send message Joined: 17 Sep 04 Posts: 103 Credit: 38,543 RAC: 0 |
I am interested. Please share your observations. Jim > I have discovered to predict if WU will take the full run or if it will leave > the simulation by error (when particles colide or leaving the colider-area). > If there is an interest, I will post my expiriences. |
Send message Joined: 28 Sep 04 Posts: 27 Credit: 17,091 RAC: 0 |
> I have discovered to predict if WU will take the full run or if it will leave > the simulation by error (when particles colide or leaving the colider-area). > If there is an interest, I will post my expiriences. > > greetz from Switzerland > littleBouncer Hey there! I would like to know how you can tell that and how you figured it out... Greets Vid Vidmar |
Send message Joined: 23 Oct 04 Posts: 358 Credit: 1,439,205 RAC: 0 |
> > I have discovered to predict if WU will take the full run or if it will > leave > > the simulation by error (when particles colide or leaving the > colider-area). > > If there is an interest, I will post my expiriences. > > > > greetz from Switzerland > > littleBouncer > > Hey there! > > I would like to know how you can tell that and how you figured it out... > > Greets > Vid Vidmar > > @ Jim, Vid Vidmar and all others who have respective interests of the parties concerned: On "show graphics" (not the screensaver) you can toggle the "F" - key. On the right appears 3 lines, marked TPS: #, max. TPS: #, FPS: #. (my interpretation: TPS=Turns Per Sec., FPS=Frames Per Sec.). Now: If the TPS is higher than max.TPS, the run will abort between the next 0.01 to 10 minutes). I call them "fast" WU's in the future if TPS is equal or lower , then it will take the full run: "normal" TPS's for my machines: 22-24 and 1Mio.turns will take about 9 to 12 hours (formerly known as 'tunescana', now 'boince6..') 33/34 TPS and 100000 turns will take about 45 to 65 min. and general : if max.TPS is higher then 100 (for example:256) , this simulation will crash, the TPS mount and mount...WU finish-next WU I made this expiriences last year and I wanted to post them, but then the project stopped. Now I have noticed the same. If I'm in some sort of explaination wrong; say it to me greetz from Switzerland littleBouncer [BTW]please don't abort this "fast" WU's; they are valuable for science(IMO)!!! Sorry that this thread take a complete different direction from where it is/was started! Q.:how you figured it out? A.:watching and observing the graphics (that mean: empirical (german: empirisch)), this let your brain working...:-) |
Send message Joined: 3 Sep 04 Posts: 212 Credit: 4,545 RAC: 0 |
Oops, I just realized that we didn't restart server processes since releasing the version 4.64. That means that the new version wasn't actually available. Well, now it's reset, so please try again... Markku Degerholm LHC@home admin |
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 6 Credit: 42,158 RAC: 0 |
> Oops, I just realized that we didn't restart server processes since releasing > the version 4.64. That means that the new version wasn't actually available. > > Well, now it's reset, so please try again... > > Ah! Now things look much better :-)) <br><img src="http://curly-brackets.org/boincstats/counter_big.php?project=lhc&id=1549&style=23"><br> Plan to join a team? - Consider <a href="http://www.boincsynergy.com">BOINC Synergy</a> |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 34 Credit: 19,096 RAC: 0 |
> Yes I was assuming that, but they said 'no work' all a.m. and then they came > up with a bunch of WUs and it would still d/l the old client...... It's possible that if a work units were all assigned so there were no available work to crunch and errors were reported with those work units, new work units would be sent out using the same application. But from Markku's post above, that isn't what happened here. :) Click image for more details. |
Send message Joined: 23 Oct 04 Posts: 358 Credit: 1,439,205 RAC: 0 |
> I am interested. Please share your observations. > > Jim > Hi Jim , Vid Vidmar and others in addition to the reply for VV: What "fast" WU's are and how important they are!
Hint: Did you remark 10s (10 sec.) and the results -name #s, combine yourself... |
Send message Joined: 17 Sep 04 Posts: 99 Credit: 30,738,202 RAC: 7,872 |
> Oops, I just realized that we didn't restart server processes since releasing > the version 4.64. That means that the new version wasn't actually available. > > Well, now it's reset, so please try again... > > Note: I needed to Detach and then Attach to the LHC project again, before I could download work. :) Regards, Bob P. |
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 545 Credit: 148,912 RAC: 0 |
Just a side note, I added the "Fast WU" as a question in my FAQ. The first LHC@Home entry (and it is pretty lonesome all by itself). If there are topical questions that should be added, drop me a line ... or add the question yourself to the FAQ ... though if you also have the answer, it would be better by e-mail ... |
©2024 CERN