|
41)
Message boards :
Cafe LHC :
A longer delay for the Large Hadron Collider
(Message 21356)
Posted 19 Apr 2009 by  Viking69
Post: OH MY GOD... It\\\'s HAPPENED.. disaster |
|
42)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
I got my first one...
(Message 20648)
Posted 11 Oct 2008 by Viking69
Post: Hi @ll, Everyone has to start some where. |
|
43)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Can't display WU
(Message 19895)
Posted 11 Aug 2008 by Viking69
Post: Same here. But it was nice to see some kind of work anyway. The field for typing this message ends> and then the text goes behind the background before it gets to the end of the <field and then there is a line return> this is not helpful either. But when I look a the post it looks OK. Now I am in edit m>ode and the text is <running off the end of the page. I was using the<> symbol> s to mark where my text was dissapearing and reapearing. |
|
44)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Back to work!
(Message 19788)
Posted 7 Jul 2008 by Viking69
Post: Im PISSED......... I saw that here were over 30000 WU's available and i could only get a few over several PC's...........frustration. |
|
45)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Problems fetching scheduler list over UMTS
(Message 19037)
Posted 21 Feb 2008 by Viking69
Post: If I remember correctly, this site is not using the latest versions of the BOINC server software. This may contribute to the differences you see between this and other projects. |
|
46)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
BOINC 5.10.28
(Message 18541)
Posted 3 Nov 2007 by Viking69
Post: I've got 3 windows machines all running 5.10.20 and not a problem yet. The only thing is you have to completely shut your old manager down before installing it no matter what version your upgrading from. I think I'll stick with what I've got. I din't do that on my VISTA PC and it came back all happy. |
|
47)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Stand back.......
(Message 18540)
Posted 3 Nov 2007 by Viking69
Post: Maybe a little taste of their own medicine will get us, the people who donate the CPU time that makes this project work, the respect we deserve. Respect is earned, and not always deserved. This is not a poke at you, but a comment on this process. You can have the well intentioned desire to improve this project, but ultimately this does fall into the hands of those runing the project. I am sure that they would love to upgrade the server systems to the latest and greatest, but may have other internal politics to deal with that cannot be discussed in this open forum. And to quote a cliche "all good things take time". "Patience is a virtue". |
|
48)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Server not reporting "No Work from project"
(Message 18405)
Posted 28 Oct 2007 by Viking69
Post:
OK, so I misread the POST header. But still the back off times were not for the reason of reaching the daily quota, I had see that before. But the systems were unattended and I was not controling the times of the WAIT between communication events, it was all on the software and the server. If I go back far enough in the logs I will find an item similar to the one shown above. When I looked at the web site after the last message I saw that there was work, about 90,000 units at that time and rising as I refreshed. |
|
49)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Server not reporting "No Work from project"
(Message 18391)
Posted 27 Oct 2007 by Viking69
Post: One of my PC's, the VISTA box using 5.10.20, is getting this message stream when left unattended and looking for work: 10/27/2007 1:05:23 PM|lhcathome|Message from server: Not sending work - last request too recent: 65 sec 10/27/2007 1:05:23 PM|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec 10/27/2007 1:05:23 PM|lhcathome|Reason: no work from project 10/27/2007 1:06:24 PM|lhcathome|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work 10/27/2007 1:06:24 PM|lhcathome|Requesting 1199 seconds of new work 10/27/2007 1:06:29 PM|lhcathome|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505] 10/27/2007 1:06:29 PM|lhcathome|Message from server: Not sending work - last request too recent: 65 sec 10/27/2007 1:06:29 PM|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 1 min 44 sec 10/27/2007 1:06:29 PM|lhcathome|Reason: no work from project 10/27/2007 1:08:14 PM|lhcathome|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work 10/27/2007 1:08:14 PM|lhcathome|Requesting 1199 seconds of new work 10/27/2007 1:08:19 PM|lhcathome|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505] 10/27/2007 1:08:19 PM|lhcathome|Message from server: Not sending work - last request too recent: 111 sec 10/27/2007 1:08:19 PM|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec 10/27/2007 1:08:19 PM|lhcathome|Reason: no work from project 10/27/2007 1:09:24 PM|lhcathome|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work 10/27/2007 1:09:24 PM|lhcathome|Requesting 1199 seconds of new work 10/27/2007 1:09:29 PM|lhcathome|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505] 10/27/2007 1:09:29 PM|lhcathome|Message from server: Not sending work - last request too recent: 71 sec 10/27/2007 1:09:29 PM|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 5 min 16 sec 10/27/2007 1:09:29 PM|lhcathome|Reason: no work from project 10/27/2007 1:14:50 PM|lhcathome|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work 10/27/2007 1:14:50 PM|lhcathome|Requesting 1200 seconds of new work 10/27/2007 1:14:55 PM|lhcathome|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505] 10/27/2007 1:14:55 PM|lhcathome|Message from server: Not sending work - last request too recent: 325 sec 10/27/2007 1:14:55 PM|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 19 min 10 sec 10/27/2007 1:14:55 PM|lhcathome|Reason: no work from project I have detatched and rebooted with the same result, "no work from project" because of too recent a request. I am currently focusing on POEM and LHC on my home PC's and this is the only one doing this. the other 3 PC's are XP(2) and 2k(1). |
|
50)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
A new look
(Message 17224)
Posted 4 Jul 2007 by Viking69
Post: Neasom & Alex, thanks for all the hard work you put in to get this site back up. I like most of the new designs look. Simple and clean without resorting to any new layouts that I have to re-learn. |
|
51)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Good things come to those who wait.
(Message 16934)
Posted 1 Jun 2007 by Viking69
Post: I've been waiting paitently for many months. Lets hope that Alex and his team have very few and minor issues during the restart of this project. |
|
52)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
New Hosts are Multiplying !
(Message 16736)
Posted 25 Apr 2007 by Viking69
Post: I go through computers often in my shop ... burn-in for a while b4 going out to my happy-happy end users. I've noticed that since last week, I had one host that is added as a new host everytime it connects. Now, I have two hosts multiplying like rabbits. I merged over 65 hosts today and was wondering if it's an Easter Bunny thing, or should I NOT connect any new hosts to this project?! BAM was doing this to me last year too. I have since stopped using it. I do it all manually. Not as convienient but I dont have to merge too much anymore. |
|
53)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Upload problem
(Message 14767)
Posted 21 Sep 2006 by Viking69
Post: same here..... I also noticed that in the projects list the item for LHC changed from 'LHC@home' to 'lhcathome' but the link to the web site still works.. Funky things going on. And just after I posted all my files linked up and went..... |
|
54)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Bye all!
(Message 14442)
Posted 26 Jul 2006 by Viking69
Post: I'm sorry to say, having been one of the earliest beta members that the current parlous state of this project leaves me totally disillusioned. Too bad! I know that it seems that nothing is going on with LHC, but if you look at what they have to do to get their science going you might have more patience. It can take quite a while (months,if not years) before they have an experiment set up so that they can generate information to analyze. had you been to their web site? This is not the only source of news about CERN and the LHC. CERN |
|
55)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Why can't I get any work?
(Message 14304)
Posted 13 Jul 2006 by Viking69
Post: Server Status One of my 5 PC's at home have 7 units. LUCKY ME !!!!! WOOO HOOOOO!!!! |
|
56)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
I think we should restrict work units
(Message 14208)
Posted 28 Jun 2006 by Viking69
Post: Here's where I came in on this thread on the 29th May..... |
Previous 20
©2024 CERN