Posts by Desti

61) Message boards : Number crunching : out of work ... for a long time ? (Message 9546) Posted 22 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: <blockquote>The person that normally submits jobs is on vacation until the 25th of august so we may not have work until then. </blockquote> Thx :-)
62) Message boards : Number crunching : out of work ... for a long time ? (Message 9544) Posted 22 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: <blockquote>Is anyone have a idea when the work will restart ? please do not answer : http://lhcathome.cern.ch/forum_thread.php?id=1454#9470 I don't want to read 135 post to find this info. thanks.</blockquote> Hehe, from the posting 9470 u need only get 5 down: "We have no server or technical problems. But as John so clearly said: "... It depends on what the scientists need, and when they need it." I believe the current set of studies is not yet exhausted and more work will be submitted soon. Thanks to all our crunchers for their enthusiasm! Ben Segal / LHC@home" Maybe this week, maybe next week, we don't know.
63) Message boards : Number crunching : No more work for me ? (Message 9541) Posted 22 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: <blockquote><blockquote> http://lhcathome.cern.ch/forum_thread.php?id=1454#9470 :-)</blockquote> Thank you. I search this thread, but it is now too big to be read entirely :-) Where can I find the number of WU left ? bye</blockquote> Just take a look at the start page. http://lhcathome.cern.ch/ Server Status Up, out of work
64) Message boards : Number crunching : No more work for me ? (Message 9539) Posted 22 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: <blockquote>Hi. I went on vacations for 20 days, so I had to cancel 2 workunits. Now I can't get any work from LHC. Is it a problem with me (and if so, what should I do), or is there no more work to do now ? bye</blockquote> http://lhcathome.cern.ch/forum_thread.php?id=1454#9470 :-)
65) Message boards : Number crunching : the Problem with Boinc (Message 9526) Posted 21 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: <blockquote> Well since the S4 (it seems) with Einstein the deadline is now to 7 days. </blockquote> My current Einstein@home WU is fresh until 3rd September. :-)
66) Message boards : Number crunching : no work? (Message 9515) Posted 21 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: <blockquote>Is there some problem with wu? for days now i'm getting no wu's Mark</blockquote> They are just out of work. http://lhcathome.cern.ch/forum_thread.php?id=1454#9470
67) Message boards : Number crunching : Link is corrupted. (Message 9461) Posted 18 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: <blockquote> that's the source code.... see the --!> !!! I think that's the cause. It works on Firefox, but is broken on IE 5.5</blockquote> IE 5.x is rather outdated, isn't it? btw: http://www.frsirt.com/english/advisories/2005/1450
68) Message boards : Number crunching : only 10 k WU's left (Message 9460) Posted 18 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: Server Status Up, 10874 workunits to crunch 34 concurrent connections 0_o New work please :-)
69) Message boards : Team invites : Linux Users Everywhere @ BOINC (Message 9357) Posted 12 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: You're welcome! :-)
70) Message boards : Number crunching : INTEL RECALLS Pentium 4 EXPENSIVE EDITION (Message 9328) Posted 10 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: <blockquote>>>> When I see it on CNN or intel.com, then I'll believe it. Ditto. Even The Inquirer story says it is a heatsink problem and a very small number at that. A non-story.</blockquote> When it is really a heatsink problem, why do they want the processor back?
71) Message boards : Number crunching : Problem on Linux machine (Message 9321) Posted 10 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: The BOINC benchmark and the sixtrack performance are two different shoes. It's normal, that the Linux BOINC benchmarks are lower.
72) Message boards : Number crunching : LHC and GPU computations (Message 9303) Posted 9 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: <blockquote> Another problem is that while the AGP port is extremely fast at transfering data to the graphics card they are often very slow at getting the results back to the main memory. Maybe the PCI express is better, but i do not know. </blockquote> PCIe is able to transfer data in both directions with the same speed.
73) Message boards : Cafe LHC : Website errors (Message 9164) Posted 4 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: Hello, i got some errors on the team page: Warning: fopen(../cache/5c/team_display.php_teamid%3D717%26sort_by%3Dexpavg_credit%26offset%3D0): failed to open stream: Permission denied in /shift/lxfsrk4101/data01/projects/lhcathome/html/inc/cache.inc on line 167 Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /shift/lxfsrk4101/data01/projects/lhcathome/html/inc/cache.inc on line 170 Warning: fclose(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /shift/lxfsrk4101/data01/projects/lhcathome/html/inc/cache.inc on line 171
74) Message boards : Number crunching : Zero Credit (Message 9112) Posted 2 Aug 2005 by Desti Post: > I have some wu's that have zero credit when other users have been given > credit. > > For example > 1865209 38743 28 Jul 2005 21:55:21 UTC 29 Jul 2005 9:14:16 UTC Over Success > Done 10,129.39 25.78 25.78 > 1865210 41219 29 Jul 2005 14:30:19 UTC 1 Aug 2005 17:23:41 UTC Over Success > Done 10,350.80 29.84 25.78 > 1865208 45790 29 Jul 2005 15:55:25 UTC 31 Jul 2005 21:15:44 UTC Over Success > Done 8,546.83 25.09 0.00 > 1865206 44595 29 Jul 2005 15:54:17 UTC 2 Aug 2005 5:44:50 UTC Over Success > Done 10,120.52 25.12 25.78 > 1865207 42330 29 Jul 2005 15:55:48 UTC 29 Jul 2005 22:44:27 UTC Over Success > Done 6,753.25 22.75 25.78 > > Any thoughts > > Yes, your results are invalid http://lhcathome.cern.ch/result.php?resultid=1865208
75) Message boards : Number crunching : only 10 k WU's left (Message 9067) Posted 31 Jul 2005 by Desti Post: Up, 33835 workunits to crunch 37 concurrent connections We need some new workunits in the next two days :-)
76) Message boards : Number crunching : LHC@Home does not run at lowest possible priority (Message 9058) Posted 31 Jul 2005 by Desti Post: > SETI, Einstein, Message runs at lowest possible priority. If CPUIdle is active > then CPU is shared 50% for BOINC and 50% for CPUIdle. When LHC starts, it uses > 100% CPU and does not leave anything to CPUIdle. Because it is hot where I am > (room temp. 34C now), the computer runs very hot and if loaded 100% it > overheats and crashes. If 50% CPUIdle then everything is OK. This problem > prevents me from running LHC@Home for now (despite of the fact, that my PC has > a lot of unfinished workunits). > > Looking forward to this be fixed in the next version:) > Maybe you should check your voltage settings for the cpu or get a better cooler :-)
77) Message boards : Number crunching : This guy really needs to check his computer, or overclock less... (Message 9021) Posted 29 Jul 2005 by Desti Post: > > <a> href="http://lhcathome.cern.ch/show_host_detail.php?hostid=34918">This[/url] > > guy also: http://lhcathome.cern.ch/show_host_detail.php?hostid=34918 > > > Er- is there something wrong with this post? > > The URL (and the link) point to a machine with 118 results all marked > 'Success', or have I missed something? > > No, the Success means only, that the WU has been returned.
78) Message boards : Number crunching : Versions for x86_64 platforms avaible ? (Message 9001) Posted 28 Jul 2005 by Desti Post: > > If i have a x86_64 system without working ia32 emulation, i'm not able to > run > > 32 bit programs. > > "IA-32 emulation" is a feature of Intel's Itanium (Itanic) processors. IA-64 > is Intel's 64-bit technology the Itanium is based upon. IA-64 is 100% > incompatible with AMD64, which was developed by AMD and adopted by Intel for > their x86 processor line and renamed EMT64. > > It's not possible to purchase an AMD Athlon64 or an EMT64-enabled Intel > Pentium 4 that is incapable of running 32-bit applications. 64-bit mode is > much like 32-bit "protected" mode; an enhancement of the original 8/16bit > "real" mode available on all x86 CPUs. > > That's why your statement is so curious. Which processor do you own? Vendor > & Model? Operating system? > > Take a look at this: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/amd64/technotes/index.xml?part=1&chap=4
79) Message boards : Number crunching : Versions for x86_64 platforms avaible ? (Message 8940) Posted 26 Jul 2005 by Desti Post: > > But it would be nice too have it just for better compatibility. > > As stated in the other thead, making a 64 bit version conveys no benefits, > does not make it "more" compatible. If i have a x86_64 system without working ia32 emulation, i'm not able to run 32 bit programs.
80) Message boards : Number crunching : Versions for x86_64 platforms avaible ? (Message 8937) Posted 26 Jul 2005 by Desti Post: > In short, not for LHC@Home. Sixtrack does not stand to benefit from "64-bit" > technologies at this time. For reasons why, see <a> href="http://lhcathome.cern.ch/forum_thread.php?id=1460">this[/url] thread. > But it would be nice too have it just for better compatibility.

Previous 20 · Next 20

LHC@home