1) Message boards : Number crunching : The new look bugs (Message 17424)
Posted 20 Jul 2007 by David Stites
Post:
Why do all threads have a horizontal scroll bar? It should wrap to my screen no matter what size i use. That is a Web standard. I won't read these pages if I have to scroll sideways on every line.
2) Message boards : Number crunching : Please note: this project rarely has work (Message 16911)
Posted 17 May 2007 by David Stites
Post:
We really need some work to do. After 7 years on dial-up Internet was finally able to get a DSL connection in my area and now I can really sent back data if we are given a chance to compute it. Can we get some more computer experts in to set-up your machines and at least get a count of where we all stand as far as completed credits are concerned.


In the first place we are here to help them, not the other way around. Secondly, when there is work the pigs take 98% of it leaving very little for the rest of us. LHC doesn't care so I have suspended them until such time as they actually need my help. Why fight about giving help to people who don't want it?
3) Message boards : Number crunching : Fairer distribuiton of work(Flame Fest 2007) (Message 15143)
Posted 19 Oct 2006 by David Stites
Post:
Please add my voice to the overall lack of response i have no WU now for ages.

I knew it was hard to get work around here,.... but damm! Haven't got a thing since end of July! I keep bangin them them for work,... but nodda!,...why? I gotta give them another chance! I believe in the project, but not in the method of work distribuiton! It could be better. Alot better! I hope you are listing. at least other projects do listen to thier crunchers. I wouldn't dream of telling you how to run your project, only how to keep your boxes happy! just listen!! At least tell me to get lost!!


I just suspended LHC. I am tired of my computers wasting time trying to get work from a project that doesn't seem to need my help. I will check back every month or so and if they ever seem to need me again I will be happy to help.
4) Message boards : LHC@home Science : So, neutrinos have mass, then... (Message 13283)
Posted 9 Apr 2006 by David Stites
Post:
Neutrino story on the Beeb.
Thoughts?


Bring on the "Can Neutrinos escape a Black Hole" experiments!

;)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4862112.stm


Does this mean we don't need dark matter anymore?
5) Message boards : Number crunching : Would this be a good computer for Numbers? (Message 12768)
Posted 17 Feb 2006 by David Stites
Post:
Just so you know, BOINC runs fine under XP x64. I have a 3800+ x2 with XP x64. I don't have drivers for my printer but it crunches BOINC very well.

Have fun,
6) Message boards : Number crunching : going, Going, ........ , GONE. (Message 12478)
Posted 27 Jan 2006 by David Stites
Post:
Still, it's sad to see so many people who care more about imaginary stats than about doing what's best for the project.
7) Message boards : LHC@home Science : ADMIN : What about a negatively charged strangelet? (Message 12091)
Posted 16 Jan 2006 by David Stites
Post:

It seems you have answered your own question. The short version is we all die. We are all going to die anyway so that isn't a problem but if we all die at once the human race will die out too (assuming all of us are on this one planet). I'm not sure if that is a bad thing or a good thing.

If we assume the universe will come to an end someday and the race would die out sooner or later then that doesn't really matter either.

Have a nice day,


Then.. if that's the case then why are we helping build the LHC, if it leads to our annihilation?

Because it doesn't matter. We all die sooner or later.
8) Message boards : LHC@home Science : ADMIN : What about a negatively charged strangelet? (Message 12069)
Posted 15 Jan 2006 by David Stites
Post:
If a neutral or negatively charged metastable strangelet (NNCMS) is created, the odds that it will cause the destruction of the earth are almost certain. One hope is that the positron decay period after proton absorbtion is quite long, but there is no way to compute that. If an NNCMS causes the destruction of the Earth, It could take years however. The strangelet will be pulled down to the core of the Earth by gravity (because it will be much denser than normal matter) as it eats its way through the rock. Because the strangelet will get more stable as it grows, energy will be given off in the form of gamma rays that will heat the surrounding rock. The energy released from each absorbed proton or neutron will be comparable to that of a hydrogen-hydrogen fusion reaction. Eventually, the heating will cause the core of the Earth to expand causing earthquakes and seismic waves in the oceans that will steadily worsen. People will die from earthquakes, tsunamis, or poison gasses released from rampant volcanic activity. At some point, the core of the Earth will contract again as its mass is consumed in the growing strangelet, until finally the whole Earth will be reduced to a strange mass about 100 meters in diameter.

So I ask again... What happens if the LHC creates a negatively charged metastable strangelet?

It seems you have answered your own question. The short version is we all die. We are all going to die anyway so that isn't a problem but if we all die at once the human race will die out too (assuming all of us are on this one planet). I'm not sure if that is a bad thing or a good thing.

If we assume the universe will come to an end someday and the race would die out sooner or later then that doesn't really matter either.

Have a nice day,
9) Message boards : LHC@home Science : ADMIN : What about a negatively charged strangelet? (Message 11839)
Posted 5 Jan 2006 by David Stites
Post:


Are you talking about quarks again? What have you been told about that?



No... strangelets.

http://chess.captain.at/strangelets-faq.html


I found this

Strangelets (A ) and strange nuggets
Strange quark matter in this range is still large enough to be treated as a Fermi gas, but small enough that effects relating to its finite size must be considered. The radius of such a strangelet is approximately 200 fm, which is less than the Compton wavelength of an electron. Unlike bulk strange matter, electrons will not be found within strangelets, but will be found `orbiting' the strangelet as in an atom. As a result, coulomb forces within the strangelet may no longer be neglected. In addition, surface effects must also be considered.


What language is this? It almost looks like English, at least at the word level, but it makes no sense to me.

10) Message boards : LHC@home Science : ADMIN : What about a negatively charged strangelet? (Message 11819)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by David Stites
Post:
What happens if we create a negatively charged strangelet with the LHC?

What happens if it is also metastable?

What does all that mean anyway?


Are you talking about quarks again? What have you been told about that?

11) Message boards : Number crunching : New work when? (Message 11818)
Posted 4 Jan 2006 by David Stites
Post:
Maybe they meant the next christmas ??? ;)


I hope not because I only signed up last month and I haven't had any work yet. :-(


Hey ES,
You have to have a reactive crunch drive. Just make yourself available and the next thing you know, when you least expect it, you will be doing it, over and over and over and over again. It takes a lot to satisfy them.

Happy new year,
12) Message boards : Team invites : Team BOINC Synergy (used to be seti synergy) (Message 11769)
Posted 31 Dec 2005 by David Stites
Post:
We're still here!
David

Let's bump this to the top.
13) Message boards : Cafe LHC : What will CERN do if they create a black hole? (Message 10214)
Posted 17 Sep 2005 by David Stites
Post:
<blockquote><blockquote>Ok from what I know about black holes (which is about nothing), I would say that the tiny black holes would still attract matter and then slowly grow up, no ?</blockquote>


Ok.. here's the thing, if you do create a black hole which is in the drawer of your desk, it would weigh as much as the last snack it ate.. ie.. suppose it ate your coffee mug.

The forces holding your desk together are much stronger than the gravitational forces which attract your desk to a coffee mug.

If the black hole really is stable, it'd leave a tiny hole in whatever it passes, so there would be an atom sized hole in the earth, as the black hole's momentum makes it go in a straight line and passes through anything it touches, eating a few atoms along the way as it passes through things.

So, if you do create a black hole, make sure it has enough escape velocity to leave earth orbit quickly.

</blockquote>

Isn't a blackhole created by enough mass to collapse the fabric of space-time?
Isn't it the gravity of that mass in such a small space that makes it black?
How can you have a black hole with little mass? A coffe cup doesn't have enough mass to collapse space, how can you have a singularity with that little mass and with such a small gravity well? Don't use math in your answer.
14) Message boards : Number crunching : Multiproccesing? (Message 10056)
Posted 11 Sep 2005 by David Stites
Post:
I don't know. I do, but then I have a dual core processor on one machine and two other machines. I am attached to three projects and do work for all of them, sometimes at the same time, sometimes not depending on what is available.
15) Message boards : Team invites : Team BOINC Synergy (used to be seti synergy) (Message 9355)
Posted 12 Aug 2005 by David Stites
Post:
We're still here!
David
16) Message boards : Cafe LHC : SETI transition from classic to BOINC on SETI technical news (Message 9242)
Posted 9 Aug 2005 by David Stites
Post:
ED said:
My concern about forever putting off the migration in order to please all is that we are stuck scientifically from moving on. I would rather take the lumps of many complaining, and just close down to get it done rather than being stuck while pursuing the illusive dream of a smooth transition and making everyone happy.


But the thing is nobody cares what you want to do. You are not one of the scientists running this project. There is no us. WE do not have servers, etc. We are a bunch of people who were asked to donate some processing power on *our* machines. That is all you have control of, how much to donate your computers and who to donate it too. It is *their* project and they get to make the decisions. And I am sure they have many more reasons for what they are doing then you ever thought of.
17) Message boards : Cafe LHC : What about Apple? (Message 8850)
Posted 23 Jul 2005 by David Stites
Post:
Like most Apple users you don't understand anything. OSX is based on UNIX, which makes it closer to Linux than Windows.



©2024 CERN