Posts by NOGOOD

21) Message boards : CMS Application : EXIT_NO_SUB_TASKS (Message 44510) Posted 18 Mar 2021 by NOGOOD Post: EXIT_NO_SUB_TASKS again
22) Message boards : CMS Application : EXIT_NO_SUB_TASKS (Message 44295) Posted 11 Feb 2021 by NOGOOD Post: I see number of jobs to send on LHC status page. Is it time to turn NNT off?
23) Message boards : Theory Application : Tasks run 4 days and finish with error (Message 44293) Posted 11 Feb 2021 by NOGOOD Post: Can Theory task succeed if in VM console by Alt+F2 I see olny the string "Running jobs output should appear here"?
24) Message boards : Theory Application : Maybe abnormally low credits for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 (Message 43937) Posted 17 Dec 2020 by NOGOOD Post: ... device peak of 1.00 GFLOPS should be ignored too? You may run BOINC benchmarks, then contact the project server. Already downloaded tasks do not update the GFLOPS value. Thank you, I'll try this. computezrmle, thank you! It worked out.
25) Message boards : Theory Application : Maybe abnormally low credits for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 (Message 43934) Posted 16 Dec 2020 by NOGOOD Post: ... device peak of 1.00 GFLOPS should be ignored too? You may run BOINC benchmarks, then contact the project server. Already downloaded tasks do not update the GFLOPS value. Thank you, I'll try this.
26) Message boards : Theory Application : Maybe abnormally low credits for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 (Message 43932) Posted 16 Dec 2020 by NOGOOD Post: Thank you. Wrong device peak of 1.00 GFLOPS should be ignored too?
27) Message boards : Theory Application : Maybe abnormally low credits for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 (Message 43930) Posted 16 Dec 2020 by NOGOOD Post: Now I have the same problem on another one of my PC with Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4130 CPU @ 3.40GHz [Family 6 Model 60 Stepping 3]: https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/show_host_detail.php?hostid=10675225 Computer's page and Theory task's pages shows wrong device peak of 1.00 GFLOPS. And I have abnormally low credits for Theory on this PC too. This processor is in this list: https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/cpu_list.php According to the list GFLOPS per core must be 3.91. BOINC manager benchmark shows 3.8 GFLOPS per core. P.S. SixTrack credits are correct. O !!! Everything is fine on another one of my PC with THE SAME CPU: https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/show_host_detail.php?hostid=10570965 With older versions of Windows, BOINC and VirtualBox... Seems like not CPU is a reason.
28) Message boards : Theory Application : Maybe abnormally low credits for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 (Message 43929) Posted 16 Dec 2020 by NOGOOD Post: Now I have the same problem on another one of my PC with Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4130 CPU @ 3.40GHz [Family 6 Model 60 Stepping 3]: https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/show_host_detail.php?hostid=10675225 Computer's page and Theory task's pages shows wrong device peak of 1.00 GFLOPS. And I have abnormally low credits for Theory on this PC too. This processor is in this list: https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/cpu_list.php According to the list GFLOPS per core must be 3.91. BOINC manager benchmark shows 3.8 GFLOPS per core. P.S. SixTrack credits are correct.
29) Message boards : Theory Application : Maybe abnormally low credits for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 (Message 43835) Posted 10 Dec 2020 by NOGOOD Post: Then we need a ticket for support ;-) Yes :-) It's not comfortable to run with no credits :-)
30) Message boards : Theory Application : Maybe abnormally low credits for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 (Message 43833) Posted 10 Dec 2020 by NOGOOD Post: This CPU-list is a part of the Boinc-System. Other projects have this list also included. Meanwhile, Einstein evaluate my CPU correctly: 3208.77 million ops/sec
31) Message boards : Theory Application : Maybe abnormally low credits for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 (Message 43831) Posted 10 Dec 2020 by NOGOOD Post: At the end of the list is the update-time and day. Only once a day. So, my CPU should be included in list many days ago. Oh...
32) Message boards : Theory Application : Maybe abnormally low credits for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 (Message 43829) Posted 10 Dec 2020 by NOGOOD Post: Device peak of 1.00 GFLOPS is too accurate value to be true
33) Message boards : Theory Application : Maybe abnormally low credits for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 (Message 43828) Posted 10 Dec 2020 by NOGOOD Post: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 really is not in list. I run it about 2 weeks only, but It can't be I'm the first participant with this CPU. Why this CPU is not in list? If I'm first indeed, when it will be included in list?
34) Message boards : Theory Application : Maybe abnormally low credits for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 (Message 43824) Posted 10 Dec 2020 by NOGOOD Post: Task page shows device peak of 1.00 GFLOPS Device page shows 3.42 GFLOPS BOINC manager shows 3.2 GFLOPS Device page and BOINC manager GFLOPS looks like true... Information on Task page looks incorrect on my opinion...
35) Message boards : Theory Application : Maybe abnormally low credits for Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 (Message 43821) Posted 10 Dec 2020 by NOGOOD Post: https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=290754666 CPU type: GenuineIntel Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz [Family 6 Model 63 Stepping 2] Run time: 3 hours 58 min 31 sec CPU time: 3 hours 49 min 52 sec Credits: 33.13 Why so less credits? The same device running SixTrack, for example, give me about 5 times more... All tasks running Theory at this device give me almost no credits...
36) Message boards : CMS Application : EXIT_NO_SUB_TASKS (Message 43741) Posted 29 Nov 2020 by NOGOOD Post: All best wishes, Ivan!
37) Message boards : Theory Application : Tasks showing about 10 days remaining time in BOINC manager (Message 43588) Posted 9 Nov 2020 by NOGOOD Post: This Theory Theory_2390-1107648-40 stopped after 10 days without success: https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/workunit.php?wuid=144346124 Looks like deadline and run-time limit of 10 days is not enough. I've just got successful result of this task: https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=288477387 Run time 9 days 1 hours 1 min 4 sec CPU time 8 days 20 hours 19 min 40 sec It was runnig running 24/7 and still too close to deadline.
38) Message boards : CMS Application : EXIT_NO_SUB_TASKS (Message 43573) Posted 6 Nov 2020 by NOGOOD Post: I bailed out just in the nick of time, losing only one to "no sub tasks". https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=288717194 There were two others that failed after two hours for some sort of Condor problem: https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=288717684 https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=288716912 But I am off to Rosetta. There is a new strain going around. Yes, CMS project is like a monkey with a grenade :-)
39) Message boards : CMS Application : EXIT_NO_SUB_TASKS (Message 43571) Posted 6 Nov 2020 by NOGOOD Post: No sub tasks again.
40) Message boards : CMS Application : EXIT_NO_SUB_TASKS (Message 43545) Posted 1 Nov 2020 by NOGOOD Post: No sub task. https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=288545179 The same problem.

Previous 20 · Next 20

LHC@home