|
101)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
cpu time ok... but zero credits granted
(Message 6157)
Posted 27 Feb 2005 by  Logan5@SETI.USA
Post: Seems like they've fixed the total credit issue, as I've gone up almost 1000 cobblestones over the last couple of days.... :) Regardless, the Science was unaffected and it's been a real joy to have the LHC project come back to life again. > Since they will certainly fix the Problem and Science is done regarless of > Credits, I'll keep at full throttle. > > Bugs the Credits down a bit, but IMHO that will be among their No.1 Priorities > to fix. > ========= > > I may be wrong but I think this problem with reporting 0 Time is inherent with > the v4.19 Client, I had v4.24 installed on all my computers but I couldn't get > any WU's to download without error's so I switched them all to the v4.19 > Client. > > I know with the v4.19 Client if I exit the GUI when I restart it the WU's > start back at 0:00 Time but with the v4.24 Client they start back up where > they left off. > > I switched my computers back to the v4.24 Client now that WU's can be > downloaded successfully and ran 1 of the shorter WU's and it reported the > correct time. So I shut off the Network Access on that computer because it > still has a bunch of shorter run WU's on it. I'll let it run overnight while I > sleep and see if all or any or just how many report successfully in the > morning ... > > |
|
102)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Daily Quota?
(Message 5906)
Posted 22 Feb 2005 by Logan5@SETI.USA
Post: Markku: Thank you for your prompt attention to this. Now the science benefits by my systems having some additional work to do which is all that should EVER MATTER....right? Unlike some others who post here, the Science is the MOST important thing to me, and Particle Physics is especially interesting to me. > Anyway, the quota is now at 30 per day per host. But we might run out of work > tonight... More work coming tomorrow, I hope. |
|
103)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Daily Quota?
(Message 5905)
Posted 22 Feb 2005 by Logan5@SETI.USA
Post: Ageless: Have you had too much coffee today, or lack a sense of humor?? :p Ahhh you must not understand what :p means... I am willing to overlook your rant and start over with you before you make this personal between us. Hello Ageless, my name is Logan 5 from the United States, how are you doing today? I'm fine and hope that you are doing well also. -Isin't that a much better way to approach people then your method?......LOL > That is so wrong on so many levels for you. All you want is to crunch loads of > LHC, you're not interested in any of the other projects? > > Okay, so you aren't. But is it too much to ask to have some damn patience to > see if the server can take these 6,000 people, before it's increased to many > many more, who just like you just want to bulk on work units just in case your > computer ever got to do nothing when LHC went down? > > BOINC is for sharing the network load. You don't need to crunch this project > or another, but just have patience on Alpha and Beta projects trying to get > their hardware right, with their people all over the world, none of whom will > be able to just jump to your "want". > > If you want a project that runs sturdy and never fails on you, go for CPDN. > Because it uses long wu's, over 4 months long, you'll never be out of work. > |
|
104)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Team/Account Creation Disabled - When to be reactivated?
(Message 5901)
Posted 22 Feb 2005 by Logan5@SETI.USA
Post: A short and to the point answer. I'm sure then that my waiting team mates will find other projects to fill the void. Hopefully the need you speak of will not take too long before showing. Any particular project the LHC admins recommend while theirs is closed to the public?? > We will enable account creation when we both need and can handle more users. |
|
105)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Team/Account Creation Disabled - When to be reactivated?
(Message 5894)
Posted 22 Feb 2005 by Logan5@SETI.USA
Post: Now that the LHC Project seems to be awakening, when exactly will the new account signups be reactivated? EDIT: I had no idea this was/is still a Closed Beta after all the months of downtime. I will stop recommending LHC until I know for certain that the project has gone public to avoid any further misunderstandings about the project's status. My apologies. |
|
106)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Daily Quota?
(Message 5889)
Posted 22 Feb 2005 by Logan5@SETI.USA
Post: I agree is the quote even necessary any more now that the flood of returning members is subsiding....? I have about 10GHz of firepower sitting idle waiting for LHC to give more work, so instead it's crunching...ugh....S@H just for something to do.. That's just wrong on SO many levels.... :p |
|
107)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Results page
(Message 5808)
Posted 22 Feb 2005 by Logan5@SETI.USA
Post: They had to reduce the amount of RPC calls until the initial flood of returning users subsides... LOL Stats are likely low on their priority list ATM... I was downloading the new 6 track overlay at a speedy 1.3 kbps....My 56k Dialup Modem does 4.1...sheesh!! |
|
108)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Official Word on no more Work Units...!!!!
(Message 5152)
Posted 13 Nov 2004 by Logan5@SETI.USA
Post: Ok....Let's try this again. Putting aside all the Off Topic namecalling & threadcrapping that's apparently allowed to run rampant here, can ANYONE put together a coherent answer to the question of what's the "OFFICIAL" last day of the LHC Project where they transition to the new server(s) and redesign the interface model? "sometime in November or December" is really not a very accurate timeframe. If it's already happened, it would have been nice to have some kind of notification. If it's not happened yet, it would be nice to have some kind of notification when it does.... |
|
109)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Official Word on no more Work Units...!!!!
(Message 5120)
Posted 12 Nov 2004 by Logan5@SETI.USA
Post: So, is the current drought/lack of LHC Work because the project's finally moving over to their new servers/etc...? There's been no peep on this in the official places, so we're all left just speculating and taking threads like this FAR off topic.... :/ ANY "Official" word would be appreciated on this. Tx. -L5 |
|
110)
Questions and Answers :
Windows :
Fortran error on cruncher
(Message 3352)
Posted 8 Oct 2004 by Logan5@SETI.USA
Post: Just a thought: If you're overclocking your Comp, please rollback to stock settings and run the LHC Client for a while and see if the problem recurrs... I bet it doesn't because I had an overclocked PC that was doing the exact asme thing until I reset it back to stock config, and now it's working real stable and hasn't corrupted a WU in weeks.... |
|
111)
Questions and Answers :
Preferences :
User Profile Picture does not add or update when uploaded to LHC Server
(Message 3338)
Posted 8 Oct 2004 by Logan5@SETI.USA
Post: I know that there were past issues where user profile pics were not uploading correctly, and that was supposed to be fixed, but I have loaded several trial .jpg or .png files, and they do not display on my profile page. Can someone tell me how to get these to display?? The pics I am supplying are all within the sites guidelines if knowing that helps..... Thanks, -L5 |
|
112)
Questions and Answers :
Windows :
All the results of my computer are invalid
(Message 3256)
Posted 6 Oct 2004 by Logan5@SETI.USA
Post: I don't have an answer but since the BOINC core client has changed this last time, I have an AMD XP2400 running at stock speeds (2GHz) that every 2nd or 3rd result will give a "computation error" and abort the curent WU anywhere from .30sec to 5 or 10min into the unit.... Is this a problem with the new core (BOINC) client build or is it because the LHC Server's gone empty, that these last WU's were the 'dregs' and therefore not as good as they could be?? With no work to replace what's being sent up, at the rate I'm burning through them, I'll be out of 5 days worth of work in less than 4..... Any ideas from the peeps in charge....or anyone for that matter?? Thanks |
Previous 20
©2024 CERN