|
21)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Ok...who got lucky?
(Message 21894)
Posted 26 Feb 2010 by  ex_brit
Post: Well I guess I was unlucky/lucky, depending on which way one looks at it! |
|
22)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Ok...who got lucky?
(Message 21887)
Posted 26 Feb 2010 by ex_brit
Post: There is an explanation at the end of this thread: HERE Also news for Linux users. STOP PRESS; running some test jobs, very short, |
|
23)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Ok...who got lucky?
(Message 21884)
Posted 26 Feb 2010 by ex_brit
Post: Ah, glad I am not the only one. |
|
24)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Ok...who got lucky?
(Message 21879)
Posted 26 Feb 2010 by ex_brit
Post: I know it sounds crazy but maybe its my processor working ultra fast who knows? I watched the 2 work units start and within 45 seconds they both had finished and uploaded to the servers. I was amazed because they had a finish date of 04 March and I was curious to see how fast they would process. I've allocated LHC 100% of the Resource Share for now because I was anxious to catch work units. There is no work available to download anymore so perhaps I got test units? They registered in the BOINC client because under BOINC Statistics tab it now says 0.40 for LHC@Home whereas it was plain old zero before. |
|
25)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Ok...who got lucky?
(Message 21867)
Posted 25 Feb 2010 by ex_brit
Post: If you blink you might miss them by the way. Both WU's took exactly 45 seconds each to finish and upload. Now the servers say it's too soon to ask for more work. |
|
26)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Ok...who got lucky?
(Message 21865)
Posted 25 Feb 2010 by ex_brit
Post: ..and I just got 2 work units. It works...at last..!! |
|
27)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Ok...who got lucky?
(Message 21843)
Posted 14 Feb 2010 by ex_brit
Post: I would just love to get my first one....LOL !! I read somewhere (don't ask me to find it) that WU's may start 15 Feb or thereabouts. |
|
28)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Ok...who got lucky?
(Message 21841)
Posted 13 Feb 2010 by ex_brit
Post: It certainly wasn't me...I'm still standing at exactly 0 WU's for this project. :-( |
|
29)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Are We There Yet?
(Message 21768)
Posted 15 Dec 2009 by ex_brit
Post: \"A virtual Black Hole.\" Now that\'s scary. Maybe we will become the next CERN study. ROTFLMAO. |
|
30)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Are We There Yet?
(Message 21766)
Posted 14 Dec 2009 by ex_brit
Post: I have a feeling that we have disappeared down that black hole that everyone talked about...LOL |
|
31)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Are We There Yet?
(Message 21758)
Posted 12 Dec 2009 by ex_brit
Post: I put no new work long ago, so my BOINC client is not asking in vain. As you can see, I still hang on to it in the hope something happens. The trouble is, unlike some, I never got any work units in the first place so am still at a staggering 0. Meanwhile I signed on to a few others. |
|
32)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Are We There Yet?
(Message 21755)
Posted 12 Dec 2009 by ex_brit
Post: I put no new work long ago, so my BOINC client is not asking in vain. I could do that I suppose. |
|
33)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Are We There Yet?
(Message 21753)
Posted 12 Dec 2009 by ex_brit
Post:
I'll reattach to the project when and if that happens. No point in having Boinc constantly polling for work when nothing is even being considered. |
|
34)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Are We There Yet?
(Message 21750)
Posted 12 Dec 2009 by ex_brit
Post: ...but I\\\'m still unsure whether or not to give up on this.Sadly enough that is the only available information. Whether to give up or not is up to your discretion. You have the same information that some use to blindly believe in this project and that others use to discard this project as failed. Thanks, that's what I thought. I think it's time I found another project. |
|
35)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Are We There Yet?
(Message 21748)
Posted 12 Dec 2009 by ex_brit
Post: Well I'm no clearer having read that thread. While it's nice that someone went to so much trouble to explain things, I think that basically we are up the creek without a paddle. Maybe I missed something, but I'm still unsure whether or not to give up on this. |
|
36)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Are We There Yet?
(Message 21743)
Posted 11 Dec 2009 by ex_brit
Post: ... or is it now a lost cause?All the answers can be found in the \\\"Café\\\" under \\\"Apologies\\\". Look for the posts coming from \\\"bigmac\\\". Thank you I'll take a look. |
|
37)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Are We There Yet?
(Message 21734)
Posted 9 Dec 2009 by ex_brit
Post: I know this sounds like the kid in the back of the car in various TV commercials, but are we there yet? I read that the LHC is back up and running but will LHC@Home ever get work units or is it now a lost cause? |
|
38)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
LHC Back Up Or Not?
(Message 21578)
Posted 30 Oct 2009 by ex_brit
Post: Hi folks, new here. I realise that LHC was down for a long time due to technical problems at launch but how is it doing right now? I guess I joined LHC@home at the wrong time as I still haven't received any work units. EDIT: I just noticed a few posts regarding this elsewhere, so I guess it's just a question of waiting for the project to get started. Thanks. |
Previous 20
©2024 CERN