61) Message boards : Team invites : Australian Alliance (Message 13630)
Posted 15 May 2006 by m.mitch
Post:



Click the emoticon above :-)

62) Message boards : Number crunching : O.K., I'm New! No Work?? (Message 13618)
Posted 14 May 2006 by m.mitch
Post:
Looking at your account info you hav`nt got a computer connected to LHC.


He has to have a computer connected he has a message log. It wont show until he returns a result.

63) Message boards : Team invites : Australian Alliance (Message 13445)
Posted 25 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:

We're still growing and still looking for more team members, in this or any other BOINC project. If you'd like to join, just click on the "BOINC@Australia" team title in either the post above or in my signature below.

The one above takes you straight to the team joining screen and the one my signature takes you to the team details screen in this project.

From there you can visit our web site, look at most pages in our forum and there is even a spot for guests to post.


64) Message boards : Number crunching : How long to wait before work is available? (Message 13443)
Posted 25 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:

Misfit this is well out of order.

Please don't wake up a thread that has been idle for 18 months just to close it, there is no point at all in bringing it to the top of the threadlists in the forum. That will do more to attract people to posting here again than your notices will stop.

It is like waking someone up to tell them they should be asleep.

And, in my view, I do not think it is appropriate to close off a thread you have not been part of recently before the closure.

Misfit, I usually enjoy your posts and the wierd sense of humour you bring with them, but unusually I have to say you got it wrong this time.

River~~



Now I understand the reason for sorting posts by rating.

"It is like waking someone up to tell them they should be asleep." This happens a lot in hospitals, it's there way of making patients sleep through their stay 8-)

65) Message boards : Number crunching : "In progress" means ?? (Message 13413)
Posted 19 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:

I think that would include WU's that have a quorum but have one or more results still not returend or timed out.

66) Message boards : Number crunching : Not HAPPY people. (Message 13366)
Posted 14 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:
Every debt is a credit,
just as every borrowing is also a lending

- to someone else ;-)

But seriously, to go into geek mode in response to your joke, in BOINC terms, if a project is in debt (and therefore will not be scheduled for a while, or will not download for a while, the "Debt" figure is negative.

If the project is owed time (and therefore a priority for downloads or for the cpu) the debt figure as recorded in the client_state goes positive.

So you could actually say that a positive debt is a credit. ;-)

Did JM7 get the signs wrong? Well no, becoause the sign depends whether you read the table as being of debt owed *to* the project, or debt owed *by* the project.

So to avoid confusion I usually say "positive debt" and "negative debt" referring the sign of the numbers in the file.

R~~



My being a B/A has me spending lots of time with programmers explaining such things for many hours :-). I get the inevitable; "What about adjustments?" Then I have to explain suspense accounts. Then there's the bank statement question; "But aren't credits good, I have them on my bank statement?" No, that's not your statement, it's the banks. They just send you a copy. Just remember, creditors: bad!".

Ten minutes latter they'll be back; "Sorry, which one's the negative?"

I love my job. I love my job. I love my job. I love my job. I love my job. I love my job.

I just hate programmers :-) And, yes, I used to be one =8-D....


67) Message boards : Number crunching : compressed project files?! (Message 13350)
Posted 13 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:

I thought this project did compress the files. Don't we download files with a Unix compression extention? Something like .tgz

68) Message boards : Number crunching : Not HAPPY people. (Message 13349)
Posted 13 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:

Hey River, isn't a "negative debt" a credit? ;-)

69) Message boards : Number crunching : Not HAPPY people. (Message 13340)
Posted 13 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:
Just a note for those that suspend lhc when it has no work available: I believe that boinc does not modify the debt figures for suspended projects, so you may find that you crunch less lhc work than you would by allowing your host to poll the project (which really wastes very little cpu/network)

You also may find that occasionally you get other peoples errored or timed out work if your host is lucky while there is supposedly no work.


I was wondering about that. What if I set it to no new work?

70) Message boards : Number crunching : Progress reverted to zero (Message 13305)
Posted 10 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:

I have Win98se and use 5.2.13 on one of my boxes without problem except for the known LHC WU's keep counting CPU cycles when they're paused.

I wonder why they say preempted? It's not preempted unles the WU gives the result before it started 8-). I could live with that!

I'll check that WU anyway and make sure it's not on any of my PC's.

71) Message boards : Number crunching : Not HAPPY people. (Message 13303)
Posted 10 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:
Yeah, I have about 10 days to my next dealine too.

I just have to remember to look ;-)
72) Message boards : Cafe LHC : 7th planet (Message 13291)
Posted 9 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:
I don't know River, I think "Uranus has a Blue Ring" sounds just fine. As long as it's pronounced "your anus" and "urine-es" because that just doesn't make any sense at all.

Doesn't matter how they try and clean it up, they still get themselves in to a ship load of trouble 8-D

73) Message boards : Number crunching : Not HAPPY people. (Message 13290)
Posted 9 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:

...[snip]...
Looks like we have a good lot of workload, so we'll be busy for a little.


I have temporarily shutdown all my other projects while LHC has WU's ;-). All I have to do now is check each day to make sure the suspended ones are not getting too close to deadlines!

74) Message boards : Number crunching : Not HAPPY people. (Message 13278)
Posted 8 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:
Some IT expert!

...


Thanks for your contribution to the thread Mike, just sharing the love?! btw - I fixed my signature, so thanks!


Yeah, then like an idiot I left of my own sig! Ha!

The post bearly made sense :(
75) Message boards : Number crunching : CPID Change? (Message 13277)
Posted 8 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:

I would recommend XtremLab for such a task (with a resource share of 1)


Hey Peter,
I like Trogs idea. Xtrem will fill up with heaps of very short WU's for the first few hours then settle down to a much more reasonable pace. Then all your PC's will have a project to draw on.

As for the other, the only common point they all had, was a lack of common sense. You had deffined the criteria of the post quite well, I thought. That's what pissed me off about their attacks. I respond like that a bit, now and then 8-), but I usually hit and retreat. Couldn't retreat when it was you ;-).

How stupid were some of those posts? They said "He should join other projects, blah, blah, blah.... else [statement of hate]..". So I said, "Peter is in a number of other projects!" But they kept saying the same thing, "other projects, other projects, other projects.." There are a lot of idiots out there, but not the truth! 8-D..

76) Message boards : Number crunching : Not HAPPY people. (Message 13265)
Posted 8 Apr 2006 by m.mitch
Post:
Some IT expert!

77) Message boards : Cafe LHC : Australians, we need you! (Message 13209)
Posted 31 Mar 2006 by m.mitch
Post:


I already had one in the Teams fora, sorry about that. My bad.

78) Message boards : Number crunching : Not HAPPY people. (Message 13208)
Posted 31 Mar 2006 by m.mitch
Post:
Sorry - aren't you all a bit off topic here?

Or are you saying that you aren't (weren't) happy with your PDP10, Fortran, punch tape?

Nice as all this wallowing in nostalgia may be for you, those of us who majored on slide rules and log tables find it all a bit too hi-tech!

;-)




"slide rules and log tables". Hey, you must be my vintage. That's what we did at school. As soon as I got out, I was shown these humungus things that looked an awful lot like Star Treck hardware that did all that for me. I'd been robbed at school, in real life we could spend all our time fixing the problem not worry how accurate our slide rule was or how we should interprolate a few lines from a log book. All though, in the early days I was know to check the output against the "trusty" slide rules and log tables 8-)

Oh, the other thing computers introduced in to the work force was "waiting". One couldn't leave the area until the job run finished, it might fail!
79) Message boards : Number crunching : bunc - BOINC UK Team Lookers first News Letter for Boinc Projects (Message 13206)
Posted 31 Mar 2006 by m.mitch
Post:
Yeah a tricky one for sure.
Best bet form a new Aussie BOINC federation and ask all teams to retain identity but join the federation. Create a council where the most senior and respected have private chats. Slowly introduce federation symbols and "speak" that will be used by all teams and members. Have common values. Align team aims. Give vocal people important jobs.

This has a habit of working...look at The European Union....its all happened and not many noticed. Those that did got big jobs. Try that formula!

Or you could all join BOUNCUK & Team Lookers instead I guess. Come to the Mother Country and be hugged!

:-)


Yeah, look at that French team. WOW! Their huge and they did something very simmilar to what you suggested but they started before BOINC was released. Very smart move!

Um, as for joining Lookers UK, well um, I think there is something in our charter 8-)

PS I popped a link to this thread in our fora. We're now, unofficially, defacto sister teams :-)
80) Message boards : Number crunching : Not HAPPY people. (Message 13195)
Posted 30 Mar 2006 by m.mitch
Post:
Yeah, my first computer-contacts have been with a pdp-11/10, and I remember these boot-straps ...

We had terminals and on each terminal, we could use 2K Memory. What a big progress, when this was blown up to 8K !

There I wrote a program (in BASIC !), that would today be named "Virus" or malicious-code: It was hidden in the machine, slept for a given time and then started to first throw messages on sessions of other users and later on, sent commands to their sessions. They punished me with keeping me off the machine for 4 weeks :-((

But it was a great time with big platters ;-)


Do you remember the first time someone could afford a second lot of 16K of RAM! Hell, the entire EDP department shut down, while we all watched through the glass in to the forbidden computer room while they put it in. Were only our Sysmgr and his two sysops could go 8-) and of course the DEC people with 16K of RAM. It might have ben 64K by then, it's all a bit long ago 8-)

You actually jogged my memory then. I first started on punch cards and we programmed in some deviant of Fortran ;-)



Previous 20 · Next 20


©2024 CERN