|
21)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Will this test stop next?-No, ... ?
(Message 7664)
Posted 12 May 2005 by  FZB
Post: >Do you think that the project is really ready for this at this moment in >time....? If the Beta is almost over, can you imagine what this place will be >like with just 5k new members, or 10k or 20k new members??? > >We barely have enough steady work for the 5104 of us as it is, and the >million WU being talked about have been worked out to last about a month or >so for just us. > >That amount could easily be depleted/sent out in 2 weeks or less if they just >added 5,000 more members with fairly fast PC's. Make it 10k new users instead >of 5k and a million WU's would only last barely a week (using the example in >a prior post as the basis). > >Unless CERN has changed their policy for the frequency of new work, I don't >see us adding new members soon unless they've got a stash of a Few Million >laying about someplace waiting to be crunched. Well, IMO (and that is really just my opinion), more allowed user should not be dependent on how long existing users would be kept happy crunching. Does it really matter if we have a 4 week break and then 4 weeks of work or if we have a 7 week break and then one week of work? We were told that this project has not constant flow of fresh wu's. I mean, as long as the sience is done... There are enough projects out there to crunch in the breaks and it get more as time passes on. Just my opinion |
|
22)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Fortran - error!
(Message 7502)
Posted 7 May 2005 by FZB
Post: translation would be more like: session was aborted |
|
23)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Is there actually going to be some work?
(Message 3464)
Posted 10 Oct 2004 by FZB
Post: just out of cusriosity... what issues do you have with CPDN? > ....Because I'm just going to quit all BOINC projects at this rate. I have > been part of SETI@Home, Predictor@Home, CPDN, and this one. All have played up > miserably. |
Previous 20
©2024 CERN