Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc 4.51 ALPHA Client foe Windows Benchmark
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Guido Alexander Waldenmeier

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 321
Credit: 10,607
RAC: 0
Message 4308 - Posted: 25 Oct 2004, 12:55:06 UTC

on amd64 3000+ win xp
2004-10-25 14:53:05 - 1826 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
2004-10-25 14:53:05 - 5053 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU

ID: 4308 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile sysfried

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 04
Posts: 282
Credit: 1,415,417
RAC: 0
Message 4310 - Posted: 25 Oct 2004, 12:58:26 UTC - in response to Message 4308.  

> on amd64 3000+ win xp
> 2004-10-25 14:53:05 - 1826 double precision MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU
> 2004-10-25 14:53:05 - 5053 integer MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU
>
>
>
please post benchmark results of previous versions as well, so we can compare...

*feel like having a deja vu here*
ID: 4310 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Guido Alexander Waldenmeier

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 321
Credit: 10,607
RAC: 0
Message 4314 - Posted: 25 Oct 2004, 13:10:27 UTC
Last modified: 25 Oct 2004, 13:14:48 UTC

with the client 4.13
on amd64 3000+ win xp
MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU plus + round 30
MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU minus - round 40
i have not the exact numbers,this is what i remember
run on my side with no problems
a good thing i have do is in the account set write to disk every 600 seconds
this are on one of my computers brings more stability
ID: 4314 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile sysfried

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 04
Posts: 282
Credit: 1,415,417
RAC: 0
Message 4318 - Posted: 25 Oct 2004, 15:50:20 UTC - in response to Message 4314.  

> with the client 4.13
> on amd64 3000+ win xp
> MIPS (Whetstone) per CPU plus + round 30
> MIPS (Dhrystone) per CPU minus - round 40
> i have not the exact numbers,this is what i remember
> run on my side with no problems
> a good thing i have do is in the account set write to disk every 600 seconds
> this are on one of my computers brings more stability
>

and again, this change in benchmark results is nothing more than static....

*feel like having another deja vu here*
ID: 4318 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Kuroimaho

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 04
Posts: 2
Credit: 6,177
RAC: 0
Message 4322 - Posted: 25 Oct 2004, 16:20:28 UTC

I concur, it does not matter what are your bench stats.
Moreover has not much to do with the processing speed of LHC.

Starting this thread with every new alpha/beta/final BOINC release
is pointless.
ID: 4322 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile irzyxel

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 29
Credit: 116,231
RAC: 0
Message 4329 - Posted: 25 Oct 2004, 17:34:03 UTC

why do you keep making such a crap post with every new version
AGAIN the bench didnt change anything measurable
ID: 4329 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Boinc 4.51 ALPHA Client foe Windows Benchmark


©2024 CERN