Message boards : Number crunching : Thread Closed
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
ChinookFoehn

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 04
Posts: 40
Credit: 293,269
RAC: 0
Message 3718 - Posted: 13 Oct 2004, 5:49:30 UTC
Last modified: 18 Dec 2004, 8:14:52 UTC

ID: 3718 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Alex

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 378
Credit: 10,765
RAC: 0
Message 3720 - Posted: 13 Oct 2004, 6:09:16 UTC - in response to Message 3718.  

The 'cant parse scheduler reply' means that the scheduler returned some silly error code instead of some codes that boinc likes to use.

I wouldn't worry about work units done in the transitional stages where technicians were taking sledgehammers to the servers to make them work.

______________________________________________________________
Did your tech wear a static strap? No? Well, there ya go! :p
ID: 3720 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Toby

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 04
Posts: 137
Credit: 1,691,526
RAC: 48
Message 3726 - Posted: 13 Oct 2004, 8:21:11 UTC

where "some silly error code" = a text/plain message containing an error message that there was an error connecting to the database
and
"some codes that boinc likes to use" = valid text/xml formatted reply
:)

Happens when the database gets overloaded... or when the sledge hammers are swinging of course.


--------------------------------------
A member of The Knights Who Say Ni!
My BOINC stats site
ID: 3726 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Stephen Balch

Send message
Joined: 22 Sep 04
Posts: 42
Credit: 2,956
RAC: 0
Message 3738 - Posted: 13 Oct 2004, 11:56:09 UTC
Last modified: 13 Oct 2004, 12:37:23 UTC

I have the same question about this set of results (my oldest "pending" result):


Summary of workunit
application -----
created 22 Sep 2004 12:20:22 UTC
name v64lhc1000pro4s16_18541.58_1_sixvf_22440
granted credit 0.00

Results:
Result ID Host Sent Received Server Outcome Client CPU time claimed granted
(sec) credit credit
175588 4253 22 Sep 2004 23 Sep 2004 Over Success Done 179.83 0.79 pending
13:01:17 UTC 4:48:12 UTC
175589 4483 22 Sep 2004 22 Sep 2004 Over Success Done 540.21 1.60 pending
13:01:30 UTC 19:34:22 UTC
175590 4487 22 Sep 2004 23 Sep 2004 Over Success Done 536.67 0.67 pending
13:01:15 UTC 6:51:26 UTC
245825 5086 23 Sep 2004 --- Over No reply New 0.00 --- ---
17:27:51 UTC
869680 3533 8 Oct 2004 8 Oct 2004 Over Success Done 934.99 1.68 pending
12:21:06 UTC 15:05:11 UTC
870348 7984 8 Oct 2004 --- In Unknown New --- --- ---
15:05:20 UTC Progress
858306 4263 7 Oct 2004 8 Oct 2004 Over Success Done 0.00 0.00 pending
14:50:17 UTC 12:20:43 UTC


I would seem to me the quorum was reached on or about 23 Sep 2004.

Yes, I am aware that the results must match within certain limits, but there is insufficient detail available on the result displays over the Internet to make any determination about that.
ID: 3738 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Nikolay A. Saharov

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 04
Posts: 15
Credit: 233,588
RAC: 0
Message 3761 - Posted: 13 Oct 2004, 18:29:04 UTC
Last modified: 13 Oct 2004, 18:29:50 UTC

I also have another one:
http://lhcathome.cern.ch/workunit.php?wuid=151123

@Dev Team: have you any tools to quickly find some WUs with many pending results like this one?

ID: 3761 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Friederich Prinz

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 04
Posts: 7
Credit: 7,346
RAC: 0
Message 3767 - Posted: 13 Oct 2004, 19:35:38 UTC - in response to Message 3718.  


> I was wondering about these two work units:

oh my - I have about some 50 pending results in my cluster ;-)
claimed credits are about somewhat like 1800, still waiting for what ? ;-)

--- fritz
ID: 3767 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Thread Closed


©2024 CERN