Message boards : Number crunching : Thread Closed
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
ChinookFoehn

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 04
Posts: 40
Credit: 293,269
RAC: 0
Message 3675 - Posted: 12 Oct 2004, 15:58:02 UTC
Last modified: 18 Dec 2004, 8:15:38 UTC

ID: 3675 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Markku Degerholm

Send message
Joined: 3 Sep 04
Posts: 212
Credit: 4,545
RAC: 0
Message 3681 - Posted: 12 Oct 2004, 16:27:28 UTC - in response to Message 3675.  


> If a work unit performs no calculations, how can it claim any credit if no
> work is performed - even if it is 0.00?
>
> If such a work unit, that claims 0.00 credit then is the lowest credit
> claimed, will it always pre-empt work units where calculations actually took
> place?

The validator will compare all successful results, and first pair to have good enough match is considered valid.

I admit that the validator should be more intelligent; that is, it should validate the pair having the best correspondence with some reasonable CPU time.

Markku Degerholm
LHC@home Admin
ID: 3681 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Thread Closed


©2024 CERN