Questions and Answers : Sixtrack : Copyrights & lhc@home
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
grumpy

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 04
Posts: 57
Credit: 2,834,109
RAC: 103
Message 3451 - Posted: 10 Oct 2004, 15:16:54 UTC

Legal stuff.

Your building this apparatus at CERN.
Your sending out to the the public domain fragmented calculations.
Don't you have patents ,copyrights, trade secrets involved in these calculations ?

Because strangely some of results , calculation parameters don't seem to be encrypted .
Is there a problem or is this really not important ?
I find it simply odd.

EXAMPLE:

LYAPUNOV ANALYSIS
A RESONANCE IS CONSIDERED TO BE STRONG WHEN THE Q-VALUES ARE CLOSER TO IT THAN


ID: 3451 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Ben Segal
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 04
Posts: 139
Credit: 2,579
RAC: 0
Message 3672 - Posted: 12 Oct 2004, 14:48:49 UTC

Hallo Golden Goose,

No, there are no patents, copyrights, trade secrets, etc. involved in these calculations. CERN has very few of these, and certainly none in the area of accelerator design, which LHC@home is crunching. We are an open research establishment and don't need to encrypt or protect our technical data.

Thanks for the concern, anyway!

Ben Segal / LHC@home Coordinator


ID: 3672 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Questions and Answers : Sixtrack : Copyrights & lhc@home


©2024 CERN