Message boards :
Xtrack/SixTrack :
Xtrack (Xboinc)
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 . . . 8 · 9 · 10 · 11 · 12 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 5 Apr 25 Posts: 51 Credit: 824,170 RAC: 22,683 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A lot of very short tasks at the moment. Some of them take less than 10 seconds, mostly less than 30 seconds. They do get validated and get credit. Getting the same, mine are running 20-40 seconds. Probably some extreme settings that kill all particles very quickly. ![]() |
Send message Joined: 26 Oct 18 Posts: 109 Credit: 5,035,218 RAC: 41,430 ![]() ![]() |
"“Life is short. Live passionately.” & “Enjoy the ride.” - The last received messages from the particles that crashed into the wall within this one https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=428280183 |
Send message Joined: 5 Apr 25 Posts: 51 Credit: 824,170 RAC: 22,683 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
"“Life is short. Live passionately.” & “Enjoy the ride.” Hahaha, 1 second, jeeze. My fastest one is 10.03. ![]() |
Send message Joined: 26 Oct 18 Posts: 109 Credit: 5,035,218 RAC: 41,430 ![]() ![]() |
A faster one had finished while I was writing. There's no CPU time but in the valid tasks list it was visible: Run time 2.01s , CPU time 0.72s. :D https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=428285638 |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Oct 04 Posts: 1234 Credit: 79,423,285 RAC: 131,721 ![]() ![]() |
I had a few hundred of those less than 10 second ones but just got a Run time 1 hours 23 min 16 sec and dozens more that look like they will run close to 90 minutes and more (93 credits) (If you were here in the early days 2004 until we started VB you remember we had all of the Sixtracks running for a few seconds and around 1 credit each) |
![]() Send message Joined: 7 May 08 Posts: 248 Credit: 1,809,807 RAC: 9,854 ![]() ![]() |
I’ll also be presenting the project at the upcoming HL-LHC collaboration meeting, where I’m sure we’ll attract even more colleagues eager to run exciting simulations with your help, all for the advancement of accelerator physics :D This is the presentation (and it's VERY interesting!!) |
Send message Joined: 5 Apr 25 Posts: 51 Credit: 824,170 RAC: 22,683 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This is the presentation (and it's VERY interesting!!) Thanks for sharing! In other news: getting decent credits/CPU time (even on Windows) with the latest batch that was released a few hours ago. ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 10 Aug 07 Posts: 60 Credit: 835,538 RAC: 172 ![]() |
Greetings! Please let me know how/when you were able to download xtrack WU? I have been trying for days with no luck. Thanks in advance, Jay |
Send message Joined: 5 Apr 25 Posts: 51 Credit: 824,170 RAC: 22,683 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I got the first ones at 14:39 UTC. Didn't do anything, one of the laptops picked them up by chance. Then the others followed. Been running Einstein/Asteroids with 0 resource share while waiting for new tasks here. ![]() |
Send message Joined: 26 Oct 18 Posts: 109 Credit: 5,035,218 RAC: 41,430 ![]() ![]() |
I have been trying for days with no luck. Hi ! Have you enabled "Run test applications" in the Project settings ? What does Boinc Event Log say when you force a project update ? |
![]() Send message Joined: 10 Aug 07 Posts: 60 Credit: 835,538 RAC: 172 ![]() |
Thank you for your response! --edit-- The 'test' was the trick!! I just downloaded 7 WU. YAY! -- end edit-- I had not checked "test" . I just changed project preferences and enabled 'test' my Boinc Logs says: Sun 12 Oct 2025 07:17:06 PM EDT | LHC@home | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks Sun 12 Oct 2025 07:17:06 PM EDT | LHC@home | No tasks sent Sun 12 Oct 2025 07:17:06 PM EDT | LHC@home | No tasks are available for XTrack Sun 12 Oct 2025 07:17:06 PM EDT | LHC@home | Tasks for AMD/ATI GPU are available, but your preferences are set to not accept them i wrote a shell script to update LHC every 4 to 6 minutes. Will keep you posted on the outcome. A question for you: are you using a 'standard' BOINC -LHC install? FYI, I am running Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:10 PM EDT | | Starting BOINC client version 7.24.1 for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:10 PM EDT | | log flags: file_xfer, sched_ops, task Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:10 PM EDT | | Libraries: libcurl/8.5.0 OpenSSL/3.0.13 zlib/1.3 brotli/1.1.0 zstd/1.5.5 libidn2/2.3.7 libpsl/0.21.2 (+libidn2/2.3.7) libssh/0.10.6/openssl/zlib nghttp2/1.59.0 librtmp/2.3 OpenLDAP/2.6.7 Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:10 PM EDT | | Data directory: /var/lib/boinc-client Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:11 PM EDT | | No usable GPUs found Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:11 PM EDT | | libc: version 2.39 Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:11 PM EDT | | Host name: pc-17 Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:11 PM EDT | | Processor: 8 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8665U CPU @ 1.90GHz [Family 6 Model 142 Stepping 12] Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:11 PM EDT | | Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc art arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg fma cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault epb ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp ibrs_enhanced tpr_shadow flexpriority ept vpid ept_ad fsgsbase tsc_adjust sgx bmi1 avx2 smep bmi2 erms invpcid mpx rdseed adx smap clflushopt intel_pt xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves dtherm ida arat pln pts hwp hwp_notify hwp_act_window hwp_epp vnmi md_clear flush_l1d arch_capabilities Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:11 PM EDT | | OS: Linux Linuxmint: Linux Mint 22.2 [6.14.0-33-generic|libc 2.39] Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:11 PM EDT | | Memory: 31.00 GB physical, 19.53 GB virtual Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:11 PM EDT | | Disk: 191.19 GB total, 179.66 GB free Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:11 PM EDT | | Local time is UTC -4 hours Sun 12 Oct 2025 05:33:11 PM EDT | | VirtualBox version: 7.0.16_Ubuntur162802 T H A N K S !! Jay |
Send message Joined: 7 Sep 16 Posts: 1 Credit: 51,901 RAC: 1,728 ![]() |
I got quite a few tasks, with work request for keeping the pc full for one day. The predicted time for the running of the work units of _232 and _234 was about 0:40 hours, but it seems like they all end up going for 3-4 hours. I also got _239 and _240, but haven't started on those yet. So it looks like I actually have work for 4 days, hopefully I can finish all the task before the deadline, but I might have to cancel a few. |
![]() Send message Joined: 26 Nov 16 Posts: 13 Credit: 197,262 RAC: 544 ![]() ![]() |
Had 4 Linux tasks failed with BOINC exit code 132. Most recent was task 428532961 Tasks name: camontan__oct_scan_end_of_collapse_round_scan_478__ScanShort_26_5__AcEdbO4MEh2R_0 Stderr output ![]() ![]() |
Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 117 Credit: 1,378,540 RAC: 6,731 ![]() ![]() |
I have a 8 threads linux host that says 10096 LHC@home 13 oct. 2025, 19:43:05 This computer has reached a limit on tasks in progressWhy this ? there are only a modest 127 tasks validated since yesterday on it (only 1 error with 0 sec calculation). I have another 4 threads linux host that has much more tasks without problem (currently 148 in cache), which does not seem crazy to me. |
Send message Joined: 5 Apr 25 Posts: 51 Credit: 824,170 RAC: 22,683 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Send message Joined: 22 Mar 17 Posts: 76 Credit: 27,456,970 RAC: 110,135 ![]() ![]() |
Bugged WU, might be interesting to find out what's wrong with it. Just the switch from 0.41 to 0.5. Same issue as this post https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/forum_thread.php?id=6378&postid=52500 |
Send message Joined: 5 Apr 25 Posts: 51 Credit: 824,170 RAC: 22,683 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oh, right, forgot that there might be old 0.41 tasks lingering... Sorry. ![]() |
Send message Joined: 7 Aug 25 Posts: 2 Credit: 46,482 RAC: 4,070 ![]() |
I roughly got like 700 WUs downloaded for Xtrack. But I think my computer can finish all this work before Sunday this week. |
Send message Joined: 1 Oct 04 Posts: 2 Credit: 170,745 RAC: 5,733 ![]() ![]() |
so next time.. Cache 0.01 day .. With this unstable setting of times .. Its like that . ALWAYS |
Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 117 Credit: 1,378,540 RAC: 6,731 ![]() ![]() |
I have a 8 threads linux host that says I'm still receiving tasks, but only 1 by 1, when 1 terminates, there is no cache available. I didn't change anything on that host, at start I had some reasonable cache (not hundreds, and that was fine), but now I can't. As long as I still get some tasks, it doesn't make much difference (except time to send back / get a new one I guess), but still this is very strange. |
©2025 CERN