Message boards :
Theory Application :
High disk reads
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 27 Sep 08 Posts: 869 Credit: 726,426,457 RAC: 154,409    |
I got a couple that ran out of ram, so the disk went high again. |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Oct 06 Posts: 92 Credit: 59,808,037 RAC: 12,537 
|
How much more ram do you think they need? I'm running 1024 mb as suggested in the thread. Do we think maybe 1280 mb might be enough? |
|
Send message Joined: 14 Jan 10 Posts: 1450 Credit: 9,745,280 RAC: 1,226   |
How much more ram do you think they need? I'm running 1024 mb as suggested in the thread. With the amount of RAM you have, I would suggest 1536MB |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Dec 15 Posts: 1875 Credit: 138,205,167 RAC: 72,997
|
On one the the two hosts which are currently running Herwig7, I set the RAM to 1024MB. Console_3 shows about 48MB swapping.How much more ram do you think they need? I'm running 1024 mb as suggested in the thread. On the other hosts on which 13 Herwigs are currently running, I set the RAM to 1536MB. Within the first 4-5 days' runtime, there was no swapping. I now checked again and see values between 4 and 18MB. All tasks are still in the integration phase. I am courious how swapping will be thereafter. So for future Herwigs, I might end up with even a higher RAM than 1536MB (with 128GB I've plenty of RAM available, anyway). |
|
Send message Joined: 17 Oct 06 Posts: 92 Credit: 59,808,037 RAC: 12,537
|
On one the the two hosts which are currently running Herwig7, I set the RAM to 1024MB. Console_3 shows about 48MB swapping.How much more ram do you think they need? I'm running 1024 mb as suggested in the thread. Welp 2048 it is then. |
|
Send message Joined: 27 Sep 08 Posts: 869 Credit: 726,426,457 RAC: 154,409 |
I did 2048 as well, I think > 80% are fine with 1024 so a mid number could be fine. For me my computers have plenty of memory so it not a liming factor |
©2025 CERN