Message boards : Sixtrack Application : unlogical differences in credit points
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Erich56

Send message
Joined: 18 Dec 15
Posts: 1821
Credit: 118,941,268
RAC: 21,804
Message 39980 - Posted: 20 Sep 2019, 8:17:45 UTC

Recently, I noticed that 2 Sixtrack tasks which were finished on the same machine (one on Sept. 19, the other on Sept. 20), got quite different credits:

https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=245591315
Runtine 9 hrs 39 minutes - 607.32 credit points

https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/result.php?resultid=245609634
Runtime 9 hrs 34 minutes - 325.36 credit points

does anyone have an explanation how come?
ID: 39980 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bronco

Send message
Joined: 13 Apr 18
Posts: 443
Credit: 8,438,885
RAC: 0
Message 39988 - Posted: 21 Sep 2019, 2:10:26 UTC - in response to Message 39980.  

Yes, I do have an explanation but unfortunately it's the same explanation you've been given for the general credit weirdness you've been complaining about for over a year. You don't seem to understand that explanation or perhaps you just don't like it so I won't bother repeating it because chances are you still won't buy it.
ID: 39988 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Erich56

Send message
Joined: 18 Dec 15
Posts: 1821
Credit: 118,941,268
RAC: 21,804
Message 39989 - Posted: 21 Sep 2019, 4:59:39 UTC - in response to Message 39988.  

You don't seem to understand that explanation or perhaps you just don't like it so I won't bother repeating it because chances are you still won't buy it.
thanks for your nice and friendly reply, anyway. Was very helpful :-(
ID: 39989 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bronco

Send message
Joined: 13 Apr 18
Posts: 443
Credit: 8,438,885
RAC: 0
Message 39993 - Posted: 21 Sep 2019, 12:44:53 UTC - in response to Message 39989.  

You don't seem to understand that explanation or perhaps you just don't like it so I won't bother repeating it because chances are you still won't buy it.
thanks for your nice and friendly reply, anyway. Was very helpful :-(


Your attempt at sarcasm is noted. The irony is that my reply is actually the very reply you need to hear, think about and take to heart which makes it friendly even if you don't like it. The reasons for illogical credit awards have been explained several times but it seems you just brush them aside in your never ending mission to be the sqeeaky wheel who motivates the devs (BOINC and LHC) to solve the crazy credits problem. But there is no good solution and devs (BOINC and LHC) know it. Accept that fact and squeak instead about a problem that does have a solution.
ID: 39993 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Erich56

Send message
Joined: 18 Dec 15
Posts: 1821
Credit: 118,941,268
RAC: 21,804
Message 39998 - Posted: 22 Sep 2019, 10:03:29 UTC - in response to Message 39993.  

everything is fine, calm down.
No idea why you are getting all that excited :-(
ID: 39998 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
bronco

Send message
Joined: 13 Apr 18
Posts: 443
Credit: 8,438,885
RAC: 0
Message 40009 - Posted: 23 Sep 2019, 15:53:14 UTC - in response to Message 39998.  

everything is fine, calm down.
No idea why you are getting all that excited :-(


And I have no idea why you're getting all that excited over a "problem" that has no good solution as has been explained to you many times. Something to do with that yellow hat and vest you wear?
ID: 40009 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Sixtrack Application : unlogical differences in credit points


©2024 CERN