Message boards :
Number crunching :
Wrong Website Statistics
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Send message Joined: 15 Jun 08 Posts: 2401 Credit: 225,347,018 RAC: 123,193    |
At least some of the project statistic pages show wrong values as there are users with a (much) higher application average than total average. Examples from https://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome/per_app_list.php?appid=14&is_team=&is_total=0 User: xxxxxxx ATLAS (recent average): 78,196.99 total (recent average): 0.10 User: xxxxxxx ATLAS (recent average): 42,408.63 total (recent average): 1,538.30 User: xxxxxxx ATLAS (recent average): 24,496.37 total (recent average): 0.07 User: xxxxxxx ATLAS (recent average): 16,186.81 total (recent average): 0.07 |
 Send message Joined: 28 Sep 04 Posts: 675 Credit: 43,522,205 RAC: 15,557
|
My guess is that application averages are calculated with different formula than total recent average. Maybe it is even outside the Boinc server code? There seems to be a much longer decay time on application average than on total recent average. 
|
|
Send message Joined: 15 Jun 08 Posts: 2401 Credit: 225,347,018 RAC: 123,193 |
You may be right, although I don't see any sense behind different decay times. In addition you may look at CMS. Lots of users with a recent average of several thousand credits although there was no work for months. |
|
Send message Joined: 28 Sep 04 Posts: 675 Credit: 43,522,205 RAC: 15,557
|
You may be right, although I don't see any sense behind different decay times. Nor do I. In addition you may look at CMS. Yep, I see the same for Theory although I haven't done any for months.
|
|
Send message Joined: 15 Jun 08 Posts: 2401 Credit: 225,347,018 RAC: 123,193 |
It looks like users who don't deliver any more results remain on their last average forever while users who deliver results, even invalids like for CMS, get their average updated. |
©2024 CERN