Message boards : Number crunching : New system time
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Philipp Riedl

Send message
Joined: 15 Dec 11
Posts: 12
Credit: 680,336
RAC: 495
Message 34427 - Posted: 20 Feb 2018, 17:42:18 UTC

Has anybody seen this before ?

Di 20 Feb 2018 17:34:37 CET |  | New system time (1519144477) < old system time (1519148074); clearing timeouts


It happened yesterday right after booting and today again, causing a lot of accidentally aborted WUs.
ID: 34427 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ivan
Volunteer moderator
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 1108
Credit: 9,319,923
RAC: 0
Message 34428 - Posted: 20 Feb 2018, 17:56:29 UTC - in response to Message 34427.  

Has anybody seen this before ?

Di 20 Feb 2018 17:34:37 CET |  | New system time (1519144477) < old system time (1519148074); clearing timeouts


It happened yesterday right after booting and today again, causing a lot of accidentally aborted WUs.

Hmm, 1519144477 is equivalent to: 02/20/2018 @ 4:34pm (UTC) and 1519148074 is equivalent to: 02/20/2018 @ 5:34pm (UTC).
So you've dropped an hour somewhere (3597 seconds to be precise). Have you been playing with your timezone settings? Or perhaps your CMOS backup battery (usually a 2032 cell) is getting weak and needs replacing?
ID: 34428 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Philipp Riedl

Send message
Joined: 15 Dec 11
Posts: 12
Credit: 680,336
RAC: 495
Message 34429 - Posted: 20 Feb 2018, 18:14:08 UTC

I did not change any time settings.

So, it may be the battery. Even though, the computer is not that old...
ID: 34429 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ivan
Volunteer moderator
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 1108
Credit: 9,319,923
RAC: 0
Message 34430 - Posted: 20 Feb 2018, 18:45:28 UTC - in response to Message 34429.  

I did not change any time settings.

So, it may be the battery. Even though, the computer is not that old...

Tja, the FX-8350 is over 5 years old but It'd depend how soon after that you bought the system. If you have lm_sensors installed and have run sensors-detect you should be able to check Vbat with the sensors command. It shouldn't be much less than 3.3 V in my experience. (Nominal is 3.0 V, mine shows 3.24 V.)
ID: 34430 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Philipp Riedl

Send message
Joined: 15 Dec 11
Posts: 12
Credit: 680,336
RAC: 495
Message 34448 - Posted: 21 Feb 2018, 16:55:00 UTC

lm_sensors says:

Vbat:         +3.29 V


so, maybe a problem with my Linux (Antergos).
ID: 34448 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : New system time


©2025 CERN