LHC@home

Task 89867037 (mine) is still marked as inconclusive even though the other 2 tasks of Workunit 42662658 were found to be valid a couple of days ago. Shouldn't mine have been marked as either valid or invalid?

Task 89867037 (mine) is still marked as inconclusive even though the other 2 tasks of Workunit 42662658 were found to be valid a couple of days ago. Shouldn't mine have been marked as either valid or invalid?

Well, I just checked status again and the WU is gone. And I don't know whether my task was ever marked valid or invalid.

Well sorry, I couldn't find any trace of the WU or Result, but
on grepping all logs I see that the WU was processed OK and
I think you have got credit. Eric.

sixtadm@boincai08 log_boincai08]$ grep "42662658" *.log
file_deleter.log:2016-04-16 04:41:25.2158 [WU#42662658] deleting w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324.zip
sixtrack_assimilator.log:2016-04-15 00:41:28.0959 [debug] [w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] assimilating WU 42662658; state=1
sixtrack_validator.log:2016-04-14 08:44:43.2713 [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] handle_wu(): No canonical result yet
sixtrack_validator.log:2016-04-14 08:44:43.2729 [debug] [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] Found 2 viable results
sixtrack_validator.log:2016-04-14 08:44:43.2729 [debug] [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] Enough for quorum, checking set.
sixtrack_validator.log:2016-04-15 00:41:20.6558 [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] handle_wu(): No canonical result yet
sixtrack_validator.log:2016-04-15 00:41:20.6610 [debug] [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] Found 3 viable results
sixtrack_validator.log:2016-04-15 00:41:20.6611 [debug] [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] Enough for quorum, checking set.
sixtrack_validator.log:2016-04-15 00:41:20.7201 [debug] [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] Found a canonical result: id=89867038
transitioner.log:2016-04-13 04:58:19.8300 [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] Generating 2 more results (2 target - 0 unsent - 0 in progress - 0 success)
transitioner.log:2016-04-14 08:40:15.1847 [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] need_validate:=>true
transitioner.log:2016-04-14 08:44:47.6489 [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] Generating 1 more results (3 target - 0 unsent - 0 in progress - 2 success)
transitioner.log:2016-04-15 00:41:19.7240 [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] need_validate:=>true
transitioner.log:2016-04-16 04:41:22.5516 [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] [RESULT#89867037 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324_0] file_delete_state:=>READY
transitioner.log:2016-04-16 04:41:22.5538 [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] [RESULT#89867038 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324_1] file_delete_state:=>READY
transitioner.log:2016-04-16 04:41:22.5550 [WU#42662658 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324] [RESULT#90125290 w6_new10_round_286_w6__20__s__62.31_60.32__6_8__5__22.5_1_sixvf_boinc2324_2] file_delete_state:=>READY

---

Well sorry, I couldn't find any trace of the WU or Result, but
on grepping all logs I see that the WU was processed OK and
I think you have got credit. Eric.

Thank you for the reply. But, just to be clear, the point of my original post was that the validator didn't appear to handle the WU correctly and not that I was worried about credit.