Message boards :
News :
Status, March 2014
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0 |
First, in reply to a recent query about 2014 workload, thanks to Msssimo: "The majority of the 2014 studies will be devoted to LHC upgrade and the rest to understand the nominal machine. I do not expect any increase in workload when approaching the LHC re-start in 2015, on the other hand, we will all be locked up in the control room and the resources for performing the simulations will be reduced." Second, we have been experiencing major problems with our Windows executables for several months now. There are "small" result differences between Windows and Linux. After extensive testing I believe they are due to the Windows ifort compiler. This will be verified and fixed as soon as I return to CERN next week. In addition new builds of SixTrack for Windows, which now include a call boinc_unzip, are failing on Windows in at least two ways; there is a problem parsing the hardware description (/proc/cpuinfo on Linux) and secondly we get "cannot Create Process" errors. So, we shall first try and build without the hopefully resposible call, and fix the result differences. We can then resume development of the case splitting to smaller WUs and the return of all results. It is great that your support continues and, when required, we have lots of capacity. Saw a new record of over 140,000 WUs in process a couple of weeks ago. Eric. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 16 Oct 13 Posts: 59 Credit: 342,408 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for keeping us informed, Eric :) |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 5 Jul 07 Posts: 21 Credit: 12,058 RAC: 0 |
Does this mean WU reissues in the future, or are the errors consistent enough to be correctable "as-is"? ![]() |
Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0 |
I a hoping the results are usable; in almost all cases the "lost" turn number is the same. May have to re-issue one or two studies. I shall be checking now I am back in Geneva. Eric. |
![]() Send message Joined: 17 Jul 05 Posts: 102 Credit: 542,016 RAC: 0 |
LHC@Home has a large user base, if nothing else helps, you could still configure homogenous redundancy level 2 (the basic 4-classes OS level, ignoring the CPU vendors) |
Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0 |
Thanks for that; I would still get slightly different results but it would be my problem at CERN and would avoid invalids for you. In fact, it should really help me find the problem as well. I'll see if I can get that done soonest. Eric. |
![]() Send message Joined: 17 Jul 05 Posts: 102 Credit: 542,016 RAC: 0 |
Not even one inconclusive in this batch for me :-) ... still get slightly different results ... Nothing really changed in the result quality. Before : The inconclusive workunits became either results with windows rounding or with *ix rounding after the third result has been returned. The third result decides about win or ix. Now : The workunits, that would have been inconclusive become either results with windows rounding or with *ix rounding. They just skip the temporary "inconclusive" state now. The first result decides about win or ix. |
![]() Send message Joined: 29 Nov 13 Posts: 58 Credit: 4,008,140 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
LHC@Home has a large user base, if nothing else helps, you could still configure homogenous redundancy level 2 (the basic 4-classes OS level, ignoring the CPU vendors) What does that mean? |
Send message Joined: 27 Oct 07 Posts: 186 Credit: 3,297,640 RAC: 0 ![]() |
LHC@Home has a large user base, if nothing else helps, you could still configure homogenous redundancy level 2 (the basic 4-classes OS level, ignoring the CPU vendors) Homogeneous Redundancy |
![]() Send message Joined: 29 Nov 13 Posts: 58 Credit: 4,008,140 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Thx :thumbsup: Team AnandTech - SETI@H, Muon1 DPAD, F@H, MW@H, A@H, LHC@H, POGS, R@H, DHEP, CPDN, E@H. Main rig - Ryzen 3600, MSI B450 Gm Pro C AC, 32GB DDR4 3200, RX580 8GB, Win10 64bit 2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870XT 3GB(DS), Win7 64bit |
©2023 CERN