Message boards : News : Hiccup, today 23rd January
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Eric Mcintosh
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 11
Posts: 843
Credit: 1,510,342
RAC: 1,475
Message 26161 - Posted: 23 Jan 2014, 8:45:25 UTC

Apologies for an interruption to service.
Working on it. More news when corrected.
Eric.
ID: 26161 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
alvin
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 12 Mar 12
Posts: 128
Credit: 20,013,377
RAC: 0
Message 26163 - Posted: 23 Jan 2014, 9:38:52 UTC

These?
Validation inconclusive (1036) · Invalid (233) · Error (211)
ID: 26163 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Eric Mcintosh
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 11
Posts: 843
Credit: 1,510,342
RAC: 1,475
Message 26164 - Posted: 23 Jan 2014, 10:44:14 UTC

Back in business (I hope). Suspended boinctest temporarily.
ID: 26164 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Eric Mcintosh
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 11
Posts: 843
Credit: 1,510,342
RAC: 1,475
Message 26165 - Posted: 23 Jan 2014, 10:44:46 UTC - in response to Message 26163.  

I'll have a look. Eric.
ID: 26165 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Richard Haselgrove

Send message
Joined: 27 Oct 07
Posts: 182
Credit: 3,115,075
RAC: 4,516
Message 26166 - Posted: 23 Jan 2014, 11:15:04 UTC - in response to Message 26165.  

I'll have a look. Eric.

I don't think it's just sixtracktest, Eric.

Have a look at results for host 9865663. It ran SixTrack v446.03 (pni) OK, but has failed every attempt at v450.03 since deployment. There's a post in Number Crunching suggesting it might be because I'm running Windows XP on that host, but looking at Costa's hosts, I don't think that can be the end of the story.
ID: 26166 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Toby Broom
Volunteer moderator

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 08
Posts: 383
Credit: 97,743,971
RAC: 151,035
Message 26167 - Posted: 23 Jan 2014, 13:45:52 UTC

my numbers are much lower?

Validation inconclusive (237) · Invalid (80) · Error (9)

All my invalids are 450.03, inconclusive are a mix of the 50/46

Error is only 2 really as the other are from 14th Mar 2013.

The invalids appear to be that no one can agree on result, run time are all sort so I assume there very unstable tracks that crash in a variable manner?
ID: 26167 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Eric Mcintosh
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 11
Posts: 843
Credit: 1,510,342
RAC: 1,475
Message 26171 - Posted: 23 Jan 2014, 16:42:32 UTC

Working (hard) on Validation issues. Eric.
ID: 26171 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Herge

Send message
Joined: 14 Jul 05
Posts: 2
Credit: 808,842
RAC: 0
Message 26173 - Posted: 23 Jan 2014, 19:28:19 UTC

Server status says over 14,000 tasks to send but I am not getting any work.


2014-01-23 14:23:18 | LHC@home 1.0 | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work.
2014-01-23 14:23:18 | LHC@home 1.0 | Requesting new tasks for CPU
2014-01-23 14:23:19 | LHC@home 1.0 | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks
2014-01-23 14:23:19 | LHC@home 1.0 | No tasks sent

ID: 26173 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Eric Mcintosh
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 11
Posts: 843
Credit: 1,510,342
RAC: 1,475
Message 26174 - Posted: 23 Jan 2014, 20:11:47 UTC

Sorry for that; we are in a bit of trouble!
to say the least. Will keep you posted on progress.
Eric.
ID: 26174 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Herge

Send message
Joined: 14 Jul 05
Posts: 2
Credit: 808,842
RAC: 0
Message 26175 - Posted: 23 Jan 2014, 20:23:13 UTC - in response to Message 26174.  

No problem. Wasn't sure if it was just me or not.
ID: 26175 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
henry

Send message
Joined: 15 Sep 13
Posts: 73
Credit: 5,763
RAC: 0
Message 26179 - Posted: 23 Jan 2014, 23:37:47 UTC - in response to Message 26171.  
Last modified: 23 Jan 2014, 23:39:39 UTC

Working (hard) on Validation issues. Eric.


If we were running these tasks on a VM the results would all be coming from exactly the same OS and 50% of your validation problems would not exist. That's more overhead? What are all these tasks that won't verify if they aren't overhead gone to waste?? The old adage "native is better" doesn't always apply in the new paradigm.
6 bangers are for wussies.
ID: 26179 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : News : Hiccup, today 23rd January


©2018 CERN