Message boards :
News :
Hiccup, today 23rd January
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
|
Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0 |
Apologies for an interruption to service. Working on it. More news when corrected. Eric. |
 Send message Joined: 12 Mar 12 Posts: 128 Credit: 20,013,377 RAC: 0 |
These? Validation inconclusive (1036) · Invalid (233) · Error (211) |
|
Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0 |
Back in business (I hope). Suspended boinctest temporarily. |
|
Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0 |
I'll have a look. Eric. |
|
Send message Joined: 27 Oct 07 Posts: 186 Credit: 3,297,640 RAC: 0 
|
I'll have a look. Eric. I don't think it's just sixtracktest, Eric. Have a look at results for host 9865663. It ran SixTrack v446.03 (pni) OK, but has failed every attempt at v450.03 since deployment. There's a post in Number Crunching suggesting it might be because I'm running Windows XP on that host, but looking at Costa's hosts, I don't think that can be the end of the story. |
|
Send message Joined: 27 Sep 08 Posts: 852 Credit: 694,189,546 RAC: 110,781   |
my numbers are much lower? Validation inconclusive (237) · Invalid (80) · Error (9) All my invalids are 450.03, inconclusive are a mix of the 50/46 Error is only 2 really as the other are from 14th Mar 2013. The invalids appear to be that no one can agree on result, run time are all sort so I assume there very unstable tracks that crash in a variable manner? |
|
Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0 |
Working (hard) on Validation issues. Eric. |
|
Send message Joined: 14 Jul 05 Posts: 2 Credit: 1,897,140 RAC: 0 |
Server status says over 14,000 tasks to send but I am not getting any work. 2014-01-23 14:23:18 | LHC@home 1.0 | Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. 2014-01-23 14:23:18 | LHC@home 1.0 | Requesting new tasks for CPU 2014-01-23 14:23:19 | LHC@home 1.0 | Scheduler request completed: got 0 new tasks 2014-01-23 14:23:19 | LHC@home 1.0 | No tasks sent |
|
Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0 |
Sorry for that; we are in a bit of trouble! to say the least. Will keep you posted on progress. Eric. |
|
Send message Joined: 14 Jul 05 Posts: 2 Credit: 1,897,140 RAC: 0 |
No problem. Wasn't sure if it was just me or not. |
|
Send message Joined: 15 Sep 13 Posts: 73 Credit: 5,763 RAC: 0 |
Working (hard) on Validation issues. Eric. If we were running these tasks on a VM the results would all be coming from exactly the same OS and 50% of your validation problems would not exist. That's more overhead? What are all these tasks that won't verify if they aren't overhead gone to waste?? The old adage "native is better" doesn't always apply in the new paradigm. 6 bangers are for wussies. |
©2025 CERN