Message boards :
Number crunching :
Credits
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 9 Jan 08 Posts: 66 Credit: 727,923 RAC: 0 |
I wish I had as high a credit as you Tom. ;-) But the task is only 108-141 seconds long. so that is like 1½-2½ minute long. You shouldn't get more credit than 0.84. The credit only comes from CPU time, not run time. Run time is just the time it was running on your system. But if you play games, watch movies or stuff like that, then your CPU time will be a lot less than your run time, since the CPU is only running at a few percentages of what it can do. Here is a normal workunit of mine that gave 139 credit for 5 hours of work. And it gave even mor credit per hour for my wingman as he completed it faster. http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/workunit.php?wuid=3149580 |
Send message Joined: 9 Jan 08 Posts: 66 Credit: 727,923 RAC: 0 |
I wish I had as high a credit as you Tom. ;-) But the task is only 108-141 seconds long. so that is like 1½-2½ minute long. You shouldn't get more credit than 0.84. The credit only comes from CPU time, not run time. Run time is just the time it was running on your system. But if you play games, watch movies or stuff like that, then your CPU time will be a lot less than your run time, since the CPU is only running at a few percentages of what it can do. Here is a normal workunit of mine that gave 139 credit for 5 hours of work. And it gave even mor credit per hour for my wingman as he completed it faster. http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/workunit.php?wuid=3149580 |
Send message Joined: 12 Dec 05 Posts: 31 Credit: 9,709,398 RAC: 0 |
1) Those are 'wlxscan' tasks - normal length for this project, not the long 'wlxu2' variety. while generally true, a minority of "wlxu2" tasks have "normal" run times, and likewise a minority of "wlxscan" and "wlxt48" tasks have long run times. |
Send message Joined: 4 May 07 Posts: 250 Credit: 826,541 RAC: 0 |
1) Those are 'wlxscan' tasks - normal length for this project, not the long 'wlxu2' variety. Hi Richard, Thanks for the info. You are correct. I've been "forcing" running of LHC Tasks so I would get some long Tasks and for some reason I thought those were the long ones. They were not as you pointed out. I found one that was already validated http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/workunit.php?wuid=3121381 and credit on this looks about normal. Also, a couple still pending http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/workunit.php?wuid=3122463 http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/workunit.php?wuid=3119041 Thanks again. |
©2024 CERN