Server/Executable problems

Author	Message
Eric Mcintosh Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0	Message 24363 - Posted: 14 Jul 2012, 18:35:54 UTC News from Saturday, 14th July. 1. The MAC executable has been withdrawn until we solve a "Bus Error" produced by probably boinc_zip. 2. We now seem to be sending the correct executable (generic, sse2/sse3, pni) on both Linux and Windows. To be confirmed. 3. Is Elapsed Time Exceeded resolved? 4. The database is OK now but we lost a lot of work for which no database entry existed because we had cleaned it and upset some? or many? users. Lost Credit and wasted CPU. 5. We are validating two results from same computer! NOT good. 6. I am running two studies of around 100,000 Work Units each and I am getting lots of good results. All in all much improved and I shall try and send a "Whatever Happendd to LHC@home report tomorrow. Eric. ID: 24363 · Reply Quote

Tom95134 Send message Joined: 4 May 07 Posts: 250 Credit: 826,541 RAC: 0	Message 24365 - Posted: 14 Jul 2012, 20:33:40 UTC Eric, Thanks for the update. ID: 24365 · Reply Quote

COMMUNISTIS G. KALEMAKIS Send message Joined: 29 Feb 12 Posts: 1 Credit: 26,939 RAC: 0	Message 24372 - Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 9:41:39 UTC - in response to Message 24274. *[list][list=][img][/img][url][size=12][/size] ok!kalemakis george.[/url][/list][/list]* ID: 24372 · Reply Quote

[AF>FAH-Addict.net]toTOW Send message Joined: 9 Oct 10 Posts: 77 Credit: 3,671,357 RAC: 0	Message 24373 - Posted: 15 Jul 2012, 13:03:14 UTC - in response to Message 24363. News from Saturday, 14th July. 6. I am running two studies of around 100,000 Work Units each and I am getting lots of good results. It seems that we already completed all of them ... server status indicates 0 task ready to send ... :( ID: 24373 · Reply Quote

Eric Mcintosh Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0	Message 24378 - Posted: 16 Jul 2012, 14:32:52 UTC - in response to Message 24373. More on the way :-) ID: 24378 · Reply Quote

ritterm Send message Joined: 30 May 08 Posts: 93 Credit: 5,160,246 RAC: 0	Message 24379 - Posted: 16 Jul 2012, 15:31:39 UTC - in response to Message 24378. More on the way :-) Excellent...I need my 100K (and more)! :D ID: 24379 · Reply Quote

T.J. Send message Joined: 17 Feb 07 Posts: 86 Credit: 968,855 RAC: 0	Message 24381 - Posted: 16 Jul 2012, 17:31:05 UTC - in response to Message 24379. More on the way :-) Excellent...I need my 100K (and more)! :D I would like to have 100K too, but on my 24/7 system LHC wu's won't upload still... Greetings from, TJ ID: 24381 · Reply Quote

Eric Mcintosh Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist Send message Joined: 12 Jul 11 Posts: 857 Credit: 1,619,050 RAC: 0	Message 24382 - Posted: 16 Jul 2012, 18:17:09 UTC - in response to Message 24381. Well maybe you are a "bad" guy........:-) Seriously can you give me a pointer and I shall try and find you in the databse, though I am not an expert on all this. Eric. ID: 24382 · Reply Quote

Mark Send message Joined: 19 Oct 07 Posts: 1 Credit: 6,470,342 RAC: 1,038	Message 24485 - Posted: 4 Aug 2012, 11:49:09 UTC Since yesterday I have received two work units which say they are 100 hour tasks on the remaining time estimate. They are short dated 10th and 11th August - There is no way I can provide that many hours in that short a time - My PC isn't on 24/7 - maybe four out of 24 hours. Is there an error in the estimates? I have noticed though that the time remaining is going down by about 12 seconds every second, but the estimate isn't getting revised. Mark ID: 24485 · Reply Quote

LHC@home