Message boards : Number crunching : no more work?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 5 · Next

AuthorMessage
ralph

Send message
Joined: 20 Oct 06
Posts: 7
Credit: 12,516
RAC: 0
Message 23371 - Posted: 6 Oct 2011, 0:31:57 UTC

I just looked at the server status, and there's no work to send? I hope this is temporary...?
ID: 23371 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Grant

Send message
Joined: 5 Oct 11
Posts: 1
Credit: 0
RAC: 0
Message 23373 - Posted: 6 Oct 2011, 2:10:44 UTC - in response to Message 23371.  

two new studies will go in tomorrow. I have been holding them back to see
the result of the sixtrack version upgrade. So far it is good. Also the
numerical comparison between the versions holds.
ID: 23373 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Igor Zacharov
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 16 May 11
Posts: 79
Credit: 111,419
RAC: 0
Message 23374 - Posted: 6 Oct 2011, 2:14:18 UTC - in response to Message 23373.  

two new studies will go in tomorrow. I have been holding them back to see
the result of the sixtrack version upgrade. So far it is good. Also the
numerical comparison between the versions holds.


Sorry, was posting accidentaly from a different account where I was testing.
The message itself is correct.
skype id: igor-zacharov
ID: 23374 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ralph

Send message
Joined: 20 Oct 06
Posts: 7
Credit: 12,516
RAC: 0
Message 23377 - Posted: 6 Oct 2011, 12:17:03 UTC

Phenomenal ! Phew -
ID: 23377 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Robert Pick

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 61
Credit: 7,436,202
RAC: 6,605
Message 23434 - Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 0:34:55 UTC

Anything in the queue? Pick
ID: 23434 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Tom95134

Send message
Joined: 4 May 07
Posts: 250
Credit: 826,541
RAC: 0
Message 23443 - Posted: 10 Oct 2011, 17:54:32 UTC
Last modified: 10 Oct 2011, 17:56:59 UTC

I've been getting work on a regular basis. Currently crunching two SixTrack 530.10 Tasks (34+ hours remaining) and have three (1x530.10 & 2x530.09) in the queue.

Windows XP SP3, BOINC 6.12.34, Intel Core2 Quad.
ID: 23443 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Teilchen

Send message
Joined: 8 Jun 07
Posts: 13
Credit: 250,850
RAC: 0
Message 23548 - Posted: 18 Oct 2011, 17:30:41 UTC

There's no work.When comes the next?
Greetings.
ID: 23548 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Kepler_Kallen

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 11
Posts: 1
Credit: 5,276
RAC: 0
Message 23550 - Posted: 18 Oct 2011, 21:37:09 UTC - in response to Message 23548.  

Same here, it has been 2+ days since I have been able to get a project...

Tue 18 Oct 2011 02:35:35 PM PDT LHC@home 1.0 Message from server: (Project has no jobs available)
ID: 23550 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Gary Roberts

Send message
Joined: 22 Jul 05
Posts: 72
Credit: 3,962,626
RAC: 0
Message 23551 - Posted: 19 Oct 2011, 2:58:19 UTC - in response to Message 23550.  

... it has been 2+ days ....

If it gets to 2+ months, it might be reason to complain :-).

This project provides work in batches. The scientists need work for a batch finished, returned and analysed so that the parameters for the next batch can be determined. It is quite normal for there to be some time needed for this to happen before a new one can be launched. The best way to minimise this time is to minimise the time it takes to clean up the dregs of the previous batch.
Cheers,
Gary.
ID: 23551 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile [AF>Libristes] Dudumomo

Send message
Joined: 23 Jan 07
Posts: 3
Credit: 1,338,492
RAC: 0
Message 23565 - Posted: 20 Oct 2011, 5:59:58 UTC - in response to Message 23551.  

Gogogogo !!!
ID: 23565 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Zapped Sparky

Send message
Joined: 22 Oct 08
Posts: 26
Credit: 75,214
RAC: 0
Message 23569 - Posted: 20 Oct 2011, 16:59:21 UTC

ID: 23569 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Krunchin-Keith [USA]
Volunteer moderator
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 209
Credit: 1,482,496
RAC: 0
Message 23575 - Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 20:50:26 UTC - in response to Message 23569.  

Grab 'em while you can! Tasks ready to send as of 20 Oct 2011 16:52:16 UTC: 42,621

I see your 42K and raise you 102K, the pot is now 144K.

I've noticed no one complainting in the last two days, so I had to check.

So for now there is NO "no more work".
ID: 23575 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Zapped Sparky

Send message
Joined: 22 Oct 08
Posts: 26
Credit: 75,214
RAC: 0
Message 23577 - Posted: 22 Oct 2011, 22:15:10 UTC - in response to Message 23575.  

Grab 'em while you can! Tasks ready to send as of 20 Oct 2011 16:52:16 UTC: 42,621

I see your 42K and raise you 102K, the pot is now 144K.

I've noticed no one complainting in the last two days, so I had to check.

So for now there is NO "no more work".

Hehehe, I can't raise as much but it's continuing to grow:
Tasks ready to send 147,627
Tasks in progress 28,657
Plenty for everyone, in the meantime I'll join the tumble weed in a wander about :D
ID: 23577 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Filipe

Send message
Joined: 9 Aug 05
Posts: 35
Credit: 5,651,573
RAC: 8,609
Message 23591 - Posted: 27 Oct 2011, 21:07:21 UTC

I see your 42K and raise you 102K, the pot is now 144K.


Dropping fast
ID: 23591 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile MAGIC Quantum Mechanic
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 24 Oct 04
Posts: 861
Credit: 38,078,049
RAC: 25,515
Message 23592 - Posted: 28 Oct 2011, 0:55:48 UTC


Yes I remember back in the early days here when guys like Keith and I would see no tasks available but if we asked for more enough times we would still get some work.

Now days things have been running much smoother and tasks make it to my place with no problems.......and the credits are much better than the 0's and .6's we used to get



Volunteer Mad Scientist For Life
ID: 23592 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ralph

Send message
Joined: 20 Oct 06
Posts: 7
Credit: 12,516
RAC: 0
Message 23602 - Posted: 30 Oct 2011, 15:50:42 UTC

Hmmmm - the server status shows 18,284 ready to send,
but I'm not getting any.

I guess I'll wait until the other three are done, and check again.
ID: 23602 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
miki

Send message
Joined: 1 Aug 11
Posts: 1
Credit: 32,349
RAC: 0
Message 23603 - Posted: 30 Oct 2011, 16:58:06 UTC - in response to Message 23602.  
Last modified: 30 Oct 2011, 16:58:55 UTC

Hmmmm - the server status shows 18,284 ready to send,
but I'm not getting any.

I guess I'll wait until the other three are done, and check again.

Hey, I have no tasks running and 2 ones are pending and I think that there are no tasks ready to send.
ID: 23603 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
diederiks

Send message
Joined: 25 Jul 05
Posts: 19
Credit: 495,408
RAC: 42
Message 23604 - Posted: 30 Oct 2011, 17:08:01 UTC
Last modified: 30 Oct 2011, 17:08:38 UTC

I yust recieved a new WU so there are stil WU's left, i think that all WU's that are now left are resend ones that only get sended to hosts that are know to produce fast and valid results, at least thats the idea.
ID: 23604 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Michael Karlinsky
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 04
Posts: 163
Credit: 1,192,543
RAC: 0
Message 23606 - Posted: 30 Oct 2011, 19:52:15 UTC - in response to Message 23602.  

Hmmmm - the server status shows 18,284 ready to send,
but I'm not getting any.

I guess I'll wait until the other three are done, and check again.



Same here :(

No explanation in sched_reply_lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch_sixtrack.xml, just "No work sent".

Michael
Team Linux Users Everywhere
ID: 23606 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Brian Alexander

Send message
Joined: 5 Mar 09
Posts: 1
Credit: 460,388
RAC: 0
Message 23608 - Posted: 31 Oct 2011, 3:10:40 UTC

I keep getting:
Sun 30 Oct 2011 10:04:21 PM CDT LHC@home 1.0 Message from server: (won't finish in time) BOINC runs 98.9% of time, computation enabled 99.6% of that


I have an AMD Phenom II x4 965 Liquid cooled - 8 Gig of ram Running Linux on SATA II raid arrays... What do you mean it won't finish it time??? It doesn't get too much faster than that
ID: 23608 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
1 · 2 · 3 · 4 . . . 5 · Next

Message boards : Number crunching : no more work?


©2019 CERN