Message boards : Number crunching : program performance
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Michael Becker

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 05
Posts: 8
Credit: 1,036,470
RAC: 0
Message 23152 - Posted: 20 Sep 2011, 20:08:49 UTC

maybe i'm wrong, but i think that the program code can be optimized.
If my client runs 4 lhc tasks, my i5 M480 cpu is always at 2,93ghz, the 'estimated app speed' in the task properties shows 2,6 GFLOPs/sec.
If only i.e. einstein tasks run, my cpu is never higher then 2,67ghz, and the properties shows 4,16 GFLOPs/sec
afaik the turbo-boost is only aktive when the cpu's cores have not so much to do

ID: 23152 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Eric Mcintosh
Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project developer
Project tester
Project scientist

Send message
Joined: 12 Jul 11
Posts: 857
Credit: 1,619,050
RAC: 0
Message 23153 - Posted: 20 Sep 2011, 20:23:32 UTC - in response to Message 23152.  

Thanks for that; we have just switched to the Intel
ifort compiler and are more worried about numerical
compatibility. If the current results are OK then
we can relax the constraints and really use SSE2 etc.
Also under the new regime we should be able to have
multiple executables targeted at the hardware available.

Eric.

ID: 23153 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Michael Becker

Send message
Joined: 15 Jul 05
Posts: 8
Credit: 1,036,470
RAC: 0
Message 23154 - Posted: 20 Sep 2011, 20:43:10 UTC - in response to Message 23153.  

thx for the quick information
my target is to find the things that can be optimized, all the time and everywhere.
The world need good solutions.
throughput and quality rules

Michael
ID: 23154 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : program performance


©2024 CERN