Message boards : LHC@home Science : New data available?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

1 · 2 · Next

AuthorMessage
Towelie

Send message
Joined: 5 Oct 10
Posts: 3
Credit: 31
RAC: 0
Message 22598 - Posted: 9 Nov 2010, 7:02:11 UTC

So, apparently they succeeded to create a miniature \"big bang\" inside the LHC. They collided 2 ions of lead, and the result was a gianormous collision with temperatures up to 10 billion (!!!) degrees. The universe hasn\'t known temperatures like that since 13.7 billion years ago, at the Big Bang.


The next test is said to be planned in 4 weeks. Meanwhile, they will analyse the data.



Does anyone know if this will mean that there will be work for us?





Grtz from Belgium,
Towelie!
ID: 22598 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Towelie

Send message
Joined: 5 Oct 10
Posts: 3
Credit: 31
RAC: 0
Message 22599 - Posted: 9 Nov 2010, 9:12:50 UTC

And I\'m talking about CERN in Geneva, Switzerland.
ID: 22599 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
tullio

Send message
Joined: 19 Feb 08
Posts: 708
Credit: 4,336,250
RAC: 0
Message 22600 - Posted: 9 Nov 2010, 17:15:04 UTC

They already have lots of data but we shall not crunch it, at least for now. The future is not foreseeable.
Tullio
ID: 22600 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Tom95134

Send message
Joined: 4 May 07
Posts: 250
Credit: 826,541
RAC: 0
Message 22601 - Posted: 10 Nov 2010, 9:00:43 UTC - in response to Message 22600.  

They already have lots of data but we shall not crunch it, at least for now. The future is not foreseeable.
Tullio

Not sure what it was but I got a short task today (11/10).
ID: 22601 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
idimitro

Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 10
Posts: 2
Credit: 306,592
RAC: 0
Message 22630 - Posted: 30 Nov 2010, 18:10:40 UTC

A month later and still nothing?
ID: 22630 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Tom95134

Send message
Joined: 4 May 07
Posts: 250
Credit: 826,541
RAC: 0
Message 22632 - Posted: 1 Dec 2010, 4:43:52 UTC - in response to Message 22630.  

A month later and still nothing?


This project has very little work. I run SETI (25%)and Einstein (25%) along with LHC (50%). The trick is to set project priorities so if work is available from LHC you get a taste and with a higher priority doing work so you might be able to get a 2nd taste but in the meanwhile you do most of your crunching on other projects.
ID: 22632 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
tullio

Send message
Joined: 19 Feb 08
Posts: 708
Credit: 4,336,250
RAC: 0
Message 22634 - Posted: 1 Dec 2010, 5:01:10 UTC

SETI is down until the new servers Oscar and Carolyn, bought from HP with money offered by the volunteers, are put on line. I am crunching Einstein, which is getting data from the Australian Parkes radiotelescope for its search of pulsars, QMC@home and AQUA@home, multithreading.
Tullio
ID: 22634 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
idimitro

Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 10
Posts: 2
Credit: 306,592
RAC: 0
Message 22636 - Posted: 4 Dec 2010, 13:46:52 UTC - in response to Message 22632.  
Last modified: 4 Dec 2010, 13:51:07 UTC

A month later and still nothing?


This project has very little work. I run SETI (25%)and Einstein (25%) along with LHC (50%). The trick is to set project priorities so if work is available from LHC you get a taste and with a higher priority doing work so you might be able to get a 2nd taste but in the meanwhile you do most of your crunching on other projects.


Thanks for the info. How to change the default resource allocation between projects? I couldn't find such an option in BOINC.
ID: 22636 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Dirk Broer

Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 05
Posts: 31
Credit: 1,238,565
RAC: 40
Message 22637 - Posted: 6 Dec 2010, 21:40:54 UTC - in response to Message 22636.  
Last modified: 6 Dec 2010, 21:43:40 UTC

Thanks for the info. How to change the default resource allocation between projects? I couldn\'t find such an option in BOINC.


You set it in the preferences of the individual project, e.g.: Your Account - LHC@Home Preferences
ID: 22637 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile charonstmu

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 04
Posts: 1
Credit: 19,475
RAC: 0
Message 22753 - Posted: 23 May 2011, 5:22:24 UTC

I\'m back after a 3 year hiatus^^ Any news on when we will be back to crunching data?
http://www.mj420.com
http://www.plutokorea.com

I enjoy crunching data in the name of science!
ID: 22753 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
alanm

Send message
Joined: 30 Mar 06
Posts: 2
Credit: 50,181
RAC: 0
Message 22760 - Posted: 30 May 2011, 12:49:49 UTC - in response to Message 22753.  

I\\\'m back after a 3 year hiatus^^ Any news on when we will be back to crunching data?



I have suspended my LHC from running. Thought it would be a good idea to get involved but there is little or no work goping on.

cheers

Alan
ID: 22760 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
tullio

Send message
Joined: 19 Feb 08
Posts: 708
Credit: 4,336,250
RAC: 0
Message 22762 - Posted: 31 May 2011, 16:11:40 UTC

Go to Number Crunching and look in LHC+@home. You might find something to do.
Tullio
ID: 22762 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Rabinovitch
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 11 May 07
Posts: 23
Credit: 3,631,975
RAC: 0
Message 22765 - Posted: 4 Jun 2011, 14:06:59 UTC

Please note and keep in mind that that so-called \"Big Bang Theory\" is just a... theory coined by limited human\'s perception, and until now only Allakh knows whether it is true or just a fake. So as all kinds of \"dark\" substances...
ID: 22765 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Butteroven

Send message
Joined: 2 Apr 06
Posts: 5
Credit: 1,222,572
RAC: 0
Message 22771 - Posted: 6 Jun 2011, 11:01:50 UTC

...not to mention all those so-called \"hadrons\"...
ID: 22771 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
tullio

Send message
Joined: 19 Feb 08
Posts: 708
Credit: 4,336,250
RAC: 0
Message 22777 - Posted: 7 Jun 2011, 8:46:31 UTC

\"Big Bang\" is not a theory. It was a joking term created by Fred Hoyle who believed in the \"steady state\" theory and wanted to discredit any creation \"ex nihilo\". But the term survived and, after the discovery of the cosmic microwave background, was widely accepted.
Tullio
ID: 22777 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 13
Posts: 59
Credit: 4,012,100
RAC: 0
Message 26626 - Posted: 5 Jul 2014, 17:18:13 UTC

Wow 919k WUs available!!! :D, I've never seen so many!

Anyone know or can say what we're crunching now?
Team AnandTech - WCG, Uni@H, F@H, MW@H, Ast@H, LHC@H, R@H, CPDN, E@H.
Main rig - Ryzen 3600, MSI B450 Gm Pro C AC, 32GB DDR4 3200, RTX 3060 Ti 8GB, Win10 64bit
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870XT 3GB(DS), Win7 64
ID: 26626 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile yo2013
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 16 Oct 13
Posts: 59
Credit: 342,408
RAC: 0
Message 26628 - Posted: 5 Jul 2014, 22:52:23 UTC - in response to Message 26626.  

We reached one million WUs now :D
ID: 26628 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Tom95134

Send message
Joined: 4 May 07
Posts: 250
Credit: 826,541
RAC: 0
Message 26629 - Posted: 6 Jul 2014, 2:31:17 UTC
Last modified: 6 Jul 2014, 2:34:03 UTC

I wonder if these are new WUs or if they are "recycled" to validate a change to sixtrack. They seem to have a much longer running time (~6 hours) than what is typical. All that I have processed have completed without error.
ID: 26629 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
[TA]Assimilator1
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Nov 13
Posts: 59
Credit: 4,012,100
RAC: 0
Message 26644 - Posted: 11 Jul 2014, 16:39:52 UTC

I've got a massive variation in WU times from 200-28,000s!!
So I can't help you on WU times I'm afraid.

Went upto ~1.25 million tasks! Dropping now
Team AnandTech - WCG, Uni@H, F@H, MW@H, Ast@H, LHC@H, R@H, CPDN, E@H.
Main rig - Ryzen 3600, MSI B450 Gm Pro C AC, 32GB DDR4 3200, RTX 3060 Ti 8GB, Win10 64bit
2nd rig - i7 4930k @4.1 GHz, 16 GB DDR3 1866, HD 7870XT 3GB(DS), Win7 64
ID: 26644 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Robert Pick

Send message
Joined: 1 Dec 05
Posts: 62
Credit: 11,441,610
RAC: 0
Message 26645 - Posted: 11 Jul 2014, 18:03:05 UTC

So many work units, so few workers!!!
ID: 26645 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
1 · 2 · Next

Message boards : LHC@home Science : New data available?


©2024 CERN