Message boards : Number crunching : Daily Quota limits
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Comatose

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 7
Credit: 3,293
RAC: 0
Message 1635 - Posted: 20 Sep 2004, 17:12:09 UTC

Mine just hit the daily quota exceeded limit while trying to get some more work, these shorter WU with a HT or a dual could be very easy to hit that wall.

Mine estimates it can do them in 49 mins the actual is about 1 hr for completing both WU using 2 threads.


ID: 1635 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Markku Degerholm

Send message
Joined: 3 Sep 04
Posts: 212
Credit: 4,545
RAC: 0
Message 1640 - Posted: 20 Sep 2004, 17:20:35 UTC - in response to Message 1635.  

> Mine just hit the daily quota exceeded limit while trying to get some more
> work, these shorter WU with a HT or a dual could be very easy to hit that
> wall.
>
> Mine estimates it can do them in 49 mins the actual is about 1 hr for
> completing both WU using 2 threads.

Ok, 20 is probably too little... I'll make it 50.

Markku Degerholm
LHC@home Admin
ID: 1640 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Thierry Van Driessche
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 04
Posts: 157
Credit: 82,604
RAC: 0
Message 1641 - Posted: 20 Sep 2004, 17:25:20 UTC - in response to Message 1640.  

> > Mine estimates it can do them in 49 mins the actual is about 1 hr for
> > completing both WU using 2 threads.
>
> Ok, 20 is probably too little... I'll make it 50.

OK.

Thanks Markku,
running at 2.88GHz on HT WU's finishes in 54min.
ID: 1641 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Hathor
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 04
Posts: 27
Credit: 298,995
RAC: 0
Message 1667 - Posted: 20 Sep 2004, 19:51:22 UTC

On my P4 3.2 with HTT and on my AMD 2600, WU's with a 00:50:21 estimated time are finishing in ~ 00:02:00 to 00:05:00.

A little too fast?




<a> [/url]
ID: 1667 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile DMMc
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 04
Posts: 3
Credit: 1,073,734
RAC: 0
Message 1698 - Posted: 21 Sep 2004, 2:41:25 UTC
Last modified: 21 Sep 2004, 2:41:42 UTC

AMD 3000+ Athlon 00:49:23 finishing in 00:29:40.
This sound about right?


Whatever You Think...
Don't Never...
Unless You Will.
ID: 1698 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Krunchin-Keith [USA]
Volunteer moderator
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 209
Credit: 1,482,496
RAC: 0
Message 1699 - Posted: 21 Sep 2004, 3:49:32 UTC
Last modified: 28 Sep 2004, 18:05:15 UTC

ID: 1699 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
KWSN_Dagger

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 18
Credit: 5,743
RAC: 0
Message 1705 - Posted: 21 Sep 2004, 5:44:32 UTC - in response to Message 1699.  

> Heres some times from my systems - I don't have all the actual figures as some
> of the machines are at work and I'm at home in bed know. I'll revise
> tomorrow.
>
> This might help some people figure out if there in the right range.
>
> running CC 4.09 + sixtrack 4.45 on all
>
> P3- 550MHz Est 3:26
> P3- 600MHz Est Oops missed one
> P3- 733MHz Est 2:38 Actual 2:10 and 2:27 2-wu's
> P3- 800MHz Est 2:32
> P3-1000MHz Est 1:50
> P4-2.20MHz Est 1:28
> P4-2.66MHz Est 1:12
> P4-2.66MHZ Est 1:12
> P4-3.06MHZ Est 1:15 Actual 0:48 to 0:51 5-wu's
>

P3- 688MHz Est 3:11 Actual 2:11 5-WU's (From an OC'd 633.)
ID: 1705 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Kuroimaho

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 04
Posts: 2
Credit: 6,177
RAC: 0
Message 1710 - Posted: 21 Sep 2004, 6:15:35 UTC

A64 3200+ overclocked to 2400 Mhz, 43min estimated 24 mins actual.
ID: 1710 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile B-Roy

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 04
Posts: 55
Credit: 10,692
RAC: 0
Message 1761 - Posted: 21 Sep 2004, 13:06:20 UTC

there is definetely something weird going on.
i installed 4.09 over 4.05 and the client started downloading 50 wus. soon after starting, my internet connection stopped working (don't know why) and all wus were ready to report with cpu time = 0 and claimed credit - of course - zero too. now I managed to be online again (a connection loss never happened to me before; i needed to reboot), and the client started to download 50 new wus. i tried to find out if lhc sended me the same wus 2 times, but it doesn't seem that it is the case.
hmm?

P.S: At the same time, lhc created another host, which I had to merge with the original one (computer id 2411 became 4272).
ID: 1761 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile B-Roy

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 04
Posts: 55
Credit: 10,692
RAC: 0
Message 1774 - Posted: 21 Sep 2004, 14:09:54 UTC

in order to remain tractable, an example would be wu 31262.
when clicking the result id 142995, it says
"4.09
app_version download error: couldn't get input files:
topOverlay_1.02_.tga: MD5 check failed


0
0"

this md5-bug is something that i already saw when downloading a climateprediction wu. does it mean that my cpu was not able to crunch because the file topOverlay_1.02_.tga was missing (lost during my connection probs)?

ID: 1774 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Brian Lunardini

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 04
Posts: 1
Credit: 15,628
RAC: 0
Message 1797 - Posted: 21 Sep 2004, 20:10:29 UTC - in response to Message 1640.  
Last modified: 21 Sep 2004, 20:22:07 UTC

> > Mine just hit the daily quota exceeded limit while trying to get some
> more
> > work, these shorter WU with a HT or a dual could be very easy to hit
> that
> > wall.
> >
> > Mine estimates it can do them in 49 mins the actual is about 1 hr for
> > completing both WU using 2 threads.
>
> Ok, 20 is probably too little... I'll make it 50.
>
> Markku Degerholm
> LHC@home Admin
>

I've still run out of work and i cannot receive more due to quotas. I understand quota's are good to prevent huge caches of data on one machine if someone messes up a config setting to download 100 days of work (hehe), but I just wanna crunch WUs ;-). I have a P4 HT 3.0 Ghz. Now some WU's go by quickly -> around 50 min I think. Maybe faster...

I also have BOINC set for 100% LHC for resources. I am a SETI member so I'll use that while I can't get work...

[edit] All the sudded I just received a massive influx of WUs, something definitely was fixed...[/edit]
ID: 1797 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
KingPin

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 16
Credit: 26,713
RAC: 0
Message 1799 - Posted: 21 Sep 2004, 20:37:23 UTC

I just run out of WUs and got the message "daily quota exceeded". I need more WUs to keep my computers happy. :(
ID: 1799 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile B-Roy

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 04
Posts: 55
Credit: 10,692
RAC: 0
Message 1802 - Posted: 21 Sep 2004, 22:06:15 UTC

mine is crunching wus in about 22 minutes (amd athlon64 3400+). but thats no big deal in quota terms since i also run seti.
cpdn isn't working and I don't have a clue why. maybe it's the new client..
ID: 1802 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Krunchin-Keith [USA]
Volunteer moderator
Project tester
Volunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 209
Credit: 1,482,496
RAC: 0
Message 1816 - Posted: 22 Sep 2004, 1:08:47 UTC
Last modified: 28 Sep 2004, 18:04:59 UTC

ID: 1816 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile The Gas Giant

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 309
Credit: 715,258
RAC: 0
Message 1819 - Posted: 22 Sep 2004, 1:44:18 UTC
Last modified: 22 Sep 2004, 6:14:03 UTC

Damn those wu's calculate quick. On my P4@2.GHz they were taking between 30sec and 6min with an average of around 2min. The daily quota sure doesn't last long with those crunching times. I did notice however that as soon as the output file hit 33.74kB the crunching was terminated. On my other machine which got wu's earlier in the day the wu's are taking a 'normal' amount of time for that machine doing 100,000 cycles when compared to the previous 1,000,000 cycles wu's.

I wonder why the difference?

Happy crunching,

Paul.

[/url]
ID: 1819 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Tony Martin

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 8
Credit: 14,751
RAC: 0
Message 2100 - Posted: 23 Sep 2004, 16:27:58 UTC - in response to Message 1816.  
Last modified: 2 Oct 2004, 18:01:58 UTC

>When does a day end ?
I have this question also my machine started to get the exceded daily quota at 22:25 UTC on 9-22-04 and its now 16:26 UTC on 9-23-04. Just when will I be able to get new work units? I only have 3 hrs of WU's left.

ID: 2100 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Markku Degerholm

Send message
Joined: 3 Sep 04
Posts: 212
Credit: 4,545
RAC: 0
Message 2102 - Posted: 23 Sep 2004, 16:45:11 UTC - in response to Message 2100.  

> >When does a day end ?
> I have this question also my machine started to get the exceded daily quota at
> 22:25 UTC on 9-22-04 and its now 16:26 UTC on 9-23-04. Just when will I be
> able to get new work units? I only have 3 hrs of WU's left.
>

Daily quota is reset at midnight, server time, which is UTC+02.

Markku Degerholm
LHC@home Admin
ID: 2102 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Markku Degerholm

Send message
Joined: 3 Sep 04
Posts: 212
Credit: 4,545
RAC: 0
Message 2103 - Posted: 23 Sep 2004, 16:48:55 UTC - in response to Message 1819.  


> I wonder why the difference?

The reason is same as in earlier work units: some input parameters make the simulation end soonier as the protons collide to walls. And it is likely that sequential results have similiar input parameters.

I'll raise the quota to 100 results for a while...

Markku Degerholm
LHC@home Admin
ID: 2103 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Tony Martin

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 8
Credit: 14,751
RAC: 0
Message 2106 - Posted: 23 Sep 2004, 17:58:27 UTC - in response to Message 2102.  
Last modified: 2 Oct 2004, 18:01:44 UTC

> > >When does a day end ?
> > I have this question also my machine started to get the exceded daily
> quota at
> > 22:25 UTC on 9-22-04 and its now 16:26 UTC on 9-23-04. Just when will I
> be
> > able to get new work units? I only have 3 hrs of WU's left.
> >
>
> Daily quota is reset at midnight, server time, which is UTC+02.
>
> Markku Degerholm
> LHC@home Admin
>

Thanks Markku

I just got 47 new WU's at 17:47 UTC now my machine is happy to have 23.5 hrs more of work to process.



ID: 2106 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Daily Quota limits


©2019 CERN