New Work Available Jan 2009

Author	Message
Ocean Archer Send message Joined: 13 Jul 05 Posts: 143 Credit: 263,300 RAC: 0	Message 20910 - Posted: 8 Jan 2009, 17:56:35 UTC Ooooohh ... Lots of new work becoming available. Thank you so much If I've lived this long, I've gotta be that old ID: 20910 · Reply Quote

Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 545 Credit: 148,912 RAC: 0	Message 20911 - Posted: 8 Jan 2009, 19:48:49 UTC Um where did you see this news? ID: 20911 · Reply Quote

Michael Karlinsky Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 163 Credit: 1,682,370 RAC: 0	Message 20912 - Posted: 8 Jan 2009, 20:20:38 UTC - in response to Message 20911. Um where did you see this news? Um, as of now: Server Status Up, 41019 workunits to crunch 54863 workunits in progress 9 concurrent connections Michael Team Linux Users Everywhere ID: 20912 · Reply Quote

Reeltime Send message Joined: 2 Jan 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 185,305 RAC: 0	Message 20914 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 0:29:20 UTC 88k wus to send ID: 20914 · Reply Quote

CharlyD Send message Joined: 1 Dec 06 Posts: 20 Credit: 17,247 RAC: 0	Message 20915 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 0:44:11 UTC but i get none! ID: 20915 · Reply Quote

Reeltime Send message Joined: 2 Jan 09 Posts: 2 Credit: 185,305 RAC: 0	Message 20917 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 1:11:09 UTC Thats strange, theres plenty out there 92k at the moment, have you tried resetting the project? ID: 20917 · Reply Quote

Yank Send message Joined: 21 Nov 05 Posts: 64 Credit: 1,979,861 RAC: 0	Message 20918 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 2:45:23 UTC - in response to Message 20915. but i get none! Is/are your computer/s available to receive them? It may be that you are loaded up on your computer with other projects. Many work units are now available., the most I have seen in some time. ID: 20918 · Reply Quote

Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 545 Credit: 148,912 RAC: 0	Message 20919 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 4:06:07 UTC - in response to Message 20918. but i get none! Is/are your computer/s available to receive them? It may be that you are loaded up on your computer with other projects. Many work units are now available., the most I have seen in some time. I am gtting oneies and twosies ... sigh ... I wish work was more continuous ... Another place where Resource Share does not really work well ... I have similar problems with SIMAP though I can usually get a nice load of work from them ... ID: 20919 · Reply Quote

Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 27 Oct 07 Posts: 186 Credit: 3,297,640 RAC: 0	Message 20922 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 11:56:54 UTC - in response to Message 20919. I am gtting oneies and twosies ... sigh ... I wish work was more continuous ... Another place where Resource Share does not really work well ... I have similar problems with SIMAP though I can usually get a nice load of work from them ... There is a deliberate policy in place on this project, which limits work supply to: * no more than 2 tasks per scheduler request * 15 minute interval between work requests * daily quota of 10 tasks/CPU I think the policy is a good one - it stops the power crunchers hoovering up all the available new work and sitting on it for days on end, and leaves some crumbs available for everyone else. ID: 20922 · Reply Quote

Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 545 Credit: 148,912 RAC: 0	Message 20923 - Posted: 9 Jan 2009, 12:24:38 UTC - in response to Message 20922. I am gtting oneies and twosies ... sigh ... I wish work was more continuous ... Another place where Resource Share does not really work well ... I have similar problems with SIMAP though I can usually get a nice load of work from them ... There is a deliberate policy in place on this project, which limits work supply to: * no more than 2 tasks per scheduler request * 15 minute interval between work requests * daily quota of 10 tasks/CPU I think the policy is a good one - it stops the power crunchers hoovering up all the available new work and sitting on it for days on end, and leaves some crumbs available for everyone else. Yeah, I saw sometnign about that in another thread ... I guess at least I am getting some work and I should be content with that ... And without restrictions like these the guys with the mega-farms would get all the work ... Shoot in a month or two my wife is going to have me down to only 4 machines ... sigh ... well maybe by then the i7 will be available in dual CPU configuration and that will be a machine to build ... 16 virtual CPUs ... that is something to look forward too ... ID: 20923 · Reply Quote

Keith T. Send message Joined: 1 Mar 07 Posts: 47 Credit: 32,356 RAC: 0	Message 20949 - Posted: 11 Jan 2009, 14:49:38 UTC 11 Jan 2009 14:41:30 UTC Results ready to send 0 The biggest WU batch in recent history has just run out. http://bluenorthernsoftware.com/scarecrow/lhcstats/lstat.html shows that this batch lasted over 3 days. I hope that we lots more similar batches in 2009. Keith. ID: 20949 · Reply Quote

Clank [MM] Send message Joined: 8 Nov 08 Posts: 2 Credit: 1,014,205 RAC: 0	Message 21080 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 6:00:30 UTC - in response to Message 20922. * no more than 2 tasks per scheduler request Not true, I have 2 machines that can grab 20-40 at a time and 2 machines that will never go past 4. I have not figured out what causes the difference though. ID: 21080 · Reply Quote

Richard Haselgrove Send message Joined: 27 Oct 07 Posts: 186 Credit: 3,297,640 RAC: 0	Message 21082 - Posted: 21 Jan 2009, 11:40:16 UTC - in response to Message 21080. Last modified: 21 Jan 2009, 11:44:34 UTC * no more than 2 tasks per scheduler request Not true, I have 2 machines that can grab 20-40 at a time and 2 machines that will never go past 4. I have not figured out what causes the difference though. Interesting. Which machines get the big allocation, and which are restricted? We may be able to work it out. Edit - 9762403 and 9769638 are the two which currently have a lot of work queued up, but their caches were filled two at a time, at 15 minute intervals, as I originally described. ID: 21082 · Reply Quote

LHC@home