LHC@home

Tengo algunas dudas sobre el funcionamiento del l�mite para informar o "deadline". Mi problema es que no utilizo el ordenador todos los d�as ni mucho tiempo y LHC@home a veces da deadlines muy cortos en comparaci�n con otros proyectos (como SETI@home).

Esto ha provocado que alguna vez haya tenido que dejar expresamente encendido el ordenador para que acabe alguna tarea cuyo deadline est� a punto de expirar. Recientemente una tarea de las largas que ten�a al 95% rebas� el tiempo l�mite en 2 d�as (hab�a apagado el ordenador), sin embargo al encenderlo de nuevo se termin� y fu� enviada.

�Esta tarea me conceder� cr�ditos de todas formas? Si ya se hab�a acabado el deadline �porqu� continu� ejecut�ndola y luego envi� los resultados? �El trabajo realizado servir� para algo o se descartan los resultados por no llegar a tiempo? �Hay alguna forma de que se pidan s�lo tareas con dadlines largos?

Como veis tengo unas cuantas dudas.


google-translate


I have some doubts about the operation of the limit for reporting or "deadline". My problem is that I do not use the computer every day, or much time and LHC@home sometimes very tight deadlines compared with other projects (such as SETI@home).

This has led ever had to leave the computer turned on expressly to finish some task whose deadline is about to expire. Recently, a task for which long had at 95% exceeded the time limit in 2 days (it had shut down the computer), however when turned on again was completed and was sent.

Is homework, I grant credits anyway? If the deadline was over why continued running it and then sent the results? The work used to something or are discarded by the results not arrive on time? Is there any way to ask only tasks dadlines long?

As you can see I have a few doubts.