Message boards : Number crunching : Holy cow, WU avalanche!!!
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
TA_JC

Send message
Joined: 17 Jul 05
Posts: 6
Credit: 1,168,693
RAC: 0
Message 19038 - Posted: 21 Feb 2008, 3:53:16 UTC

Wow...33k+ running, another 25k+ in the pipeline! I don't think I've ever seen so much work stacked up. Looks like a lot of fat WUs, too :-D
ID: 19038 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
superempie

Send message
Joined: 28 Jul 05
Posts: 24
Credit: 6,603,623
RAC: 0
Message 19043 - Posted: 21 Feb 2008, 16:48:16 UTC - in response to Message 19038.  

Yes, let's do something about that ;-)

ID: 19043 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Warped

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 04
Posts: 40
Credit: 60,176
RAC: 0
Message 19045 - Posted: 21 Feb 2008, 17:13:21 UTC

Hopefully this will revive interest in the project until the official start-up which I understand to be scheduled for June.
Warped

ID: 19045 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
baracutio

Send message
Joined: 17 Aug 05
Posts: 7
Credit: 85,292
RAC: 0
Message 19048 - Posted: 21 Feb 2008, 17:22:31 UTC

mhh, that are a lot of very small workunits. most of them between 10 and 500sec cpu time...
ID: 19048 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Ariel
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 7 Mar 07
Posts: 59
Credit: 7,906
RAC: 0
Message 19050 - Posted: 21 Feb 2008, 19:25:50 UTC - in response to Message 19048.  


mhh, that are a lot of very small workunits. most of them between 10 and 500sec cpu time...

Actually, I think many of the 1,000,000 turn WUs (which would run 5 hrs on my machine) simply "crashed the particles" in the first 1000 turns or so; this is normal for some work units. I noticed that none of the 100,000 turn WUs (30 min on my machine) crashed the particles; they ALL ran for the full 100,000 turns.

Ta-ta!





Ariel: Certified "Too Cute for LHC" Cruncher!


. . . . . . . . . . . . -- Consider the lilies.
ID: 19050 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Venturini Dario[VENETO]

Send message
Joined: 2 Nov 07
Posts: 13
Credit: 31,351
RAC: 0
Message 19052 - Posted: 22 Feb 2008, 0:18:27 UTC

On my machine it's the opposite: the 100k ones often last few seconds, the 1M ones "crash into the walls" only seldom
ID: 19052 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile anarchic teapot

Send message
Joined: 15 Feb 06
Posts: 67
Credit: 452,650
RAC: 68
Message 19053 - Posted: 22 Feb 2008, 0:39:29 UTC
Last modified: 22 Feb 2008, 0:41:19 UTC

I just got a lot of download errors. :(

Edit: (ah I see the upload/download server is disabled for debugging/maintenance. This explains that, and possibly vice versa)
sQuonk
Plague of Mice
Intel Core i3-9100 CPU@3.60 GHz, but it's doing its bit just the same.
ID: 19053 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Yrb

Send message
Joined: 4 Feb 08
Posts: 8
Credit: 5,845
RAC: 0
Message 19054 - Posted: 22 Feb 2008, 2:48:14 UTC

Official time of sorrow: 6:42pm PST, 2008-02-21

...........all gone!

),:



-Lab Rat



ID: 19054 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Richard Haselgrove

Send message
Joined: 27 Oct 07
Posts: 185
Credit: 3,297,428
RAC: 0
Message 19061 - Posted: 22 Feb 2008, 19:21:50 UTC - in response to Message 19053.  
Last modified: 22 Feb 2008, 19:23:47 UTC

Edit: (ah I see the upload/download server is disabled for debugging/maintenance. This explains that, and possibly vice versa)

According to the server status page, the upload/download server has been disabled for debugging/maintenance every single time I've looked at it since I joined the project three months ago - even when the work has been flowing freely in both directions.

I'm afraid another explanation is needed.

Edit - PS likewise the scheduler.
ID: 19061 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
TA_JC

Send message
Joined: 17 Jul 05
Posts: 6
Credit: 1,168,693
RAC: 0
Message 19068 - Posted: 23 Feb 2008, 5:49:51 UTC

74k+ running and a couple thou in the queue! This rocks!!!
ID: 19068 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Yrb

Send message
Joined: 4 Feb 08
Posts: 8
Credit: 5,845
RAC: 0
Message 19133 - Posted: 29 Feb 2008, 20:12:41 UTC


Holy Cow?

................Holy Moly!!



Nearly 37K WUs ready to crunch!!!

Sweet.


-Lab Rat




.
ID: 19133 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
KAMasud

Send message
Joined: 7 Oct 06
Posts: 108
Credit: 22,919
RAC: 0
Message 19207 - Posted: 12 Mar 2008, 19:35:32 UTC


;) At least there is peace and quiet for once. LoL.
Regards
Masud.
ID: 19207 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
seti@elrcastor.com

Send message
Joined: 28 Sep 04
Posts: 7
Credit: 575,510
RAC: 0
Message 19222 - Posted: 13 Mar 2008, 13:36:45 UTC

58722 new, 91781 inprogress
ID: 19222 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Adam23

Send message
Joined: 30 May 06
Posts: 40
Credit: 38,180
RAC: 0
Message 19223 - Posted: 13 Mar 2008, 15:09:11 UTC

Unbelievable, unthinkable, yet here they flush :)
ID: 19223 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Daxa

Send message
Joined: 29 Dec 06
Posts: 100
Credit: 184,937
RAC: 0
Message 19224 - Posted: 13 Mar 2008, 15:28:26 UTC - in response to Message 19223.  

Unbelievable, unthinkable, yet here they flush :)

There was a recent post to the "..Project rarely has work" sticky thread that I found amusing. Click here to read it.

A toast to LHC@home!




_______

"Three quarks for Muster Mark!"
. . . . . . . - James Joyce, Finnegans Wake . . . .

ID: 19224 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : Holy cow, WU avalanche!!!


©2022 CERN