Questions and Answers : Windows : Workunits finished in approx. 1 second
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
superempie

Send message
Joined: 28 Jul 05
Posts: 24
Credit: 6,603,623
RAC: 0
Message 18735 - Posted: 18 Dec 2007, 21:48:12 UTC
Last modified: 18 Dec 2007, 21:48:55 UTC

Lately I see workunits completing in a matter of seconds in stead of the normal times I usually see on my PC's. I have found this behaviour on different PC's, even after resetting the project. Is this normal behaviour or is something serious at hand?

I am running multiple projects and my BOINC version is 5.10.28 on all PC's. OS is Windows XP with the latest updates. Windows event logs are clean, or have warnings/errors not related to BOINC and Sixtrack.

System configs:
1) HP XW6000 workstation, 2x 2,4 GHz Xeons, 4GB ECC REG memory, 2x SCSI harddisks, nVidia Quadro 980 XGL gfx card

2) Dell Precision 450 workstation, 2x 2,4 GHz Xeons (low voltage models), 2GB DDR memory (non ECC, non REG), nVidia Quadro 980 XGL gfx card, 120GB IDE harddisk

3) HP XW6200 workstation motherboard with 2x 3,0GHz Xeons (800MHz FSB), 2GB ECC REG memory, Asus ATI X850 Extreme gfx card, 160 GB SATA harddisk


Here is a copy of a small part of the BOINC log:
18-12-2007 22:31:44|lhcathome|Starting wm45tsB_m45__39__64.28_59.31__8_10__5__30_1_sixvf_boinc537927_0
18-12-2007 22:31:44|lhcathome|Starting task wm45tsB_m45__39__64.28_59.31__8_10__5__30_1_sixvf_boinc537927_0 using sixtrack version 467
18-12-2007 22:31:45|lhcathome|Computation for task wm45tsB_m45__39__64.28_59.31__8_10__5__30_1_sixvf_boinc537927_0 finished
18-12-2007 22:31:45|lhcathome|Starting wm45tsB_m45__39__64.28_59.31__8_10__5__20_1_sixvf_boinc537926_0
18-12-2007 22:31:45|lhcathome|Starting task wm45tsB_m45__39__64.28_59.31__8_10__5__20_1_sixvf_boinc537926_0 using sixtrack version 467
18-12-2007 22:31:46|lhcathome|Computation for task wm45tsB_m45__39__64.28_59.31__8_10__5__20_1_sixvf_boinc537926_0 finished
18-12-2007 22:31:47|lhcathome|Started upload of wm45tsB_m45__39__64.28_59.31__8_10__5__30_1_sixvf_boinc537927_0_0
18-12-2007 22:31:48|lhcathome|Finished upload of wm45tsB_m45__39__64.28_59.31__8_10__5__30_1_sixvf_boinc537927_0_0
18-12-2007 22:31:48|lhcathome|Started upload of wm45tsB_m45__39__64.28_59.31__8_10__5__20_1_sixvf_boinc537926_0_0
18-12-2007 22:31:50|lhcathome|Finished upload of wm45tsB_m45__39__64.28_59.31__8_10__5__20_1_sixvf_boinc537926_0_0


If it is a problem, hope this info helps.


ID: 18735 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
MSeery

Send message
Joined: 1 Jun 06
Posts: 45
Credit: 17,924
RAC: 0
Message 18736 - Posted: 18 Dec 2007, 22:58:21 UTC - in response to Message 18735.  

The results I've had a quick look at appear normal, all your fellow crunchers returned them with a very short run time as well. This is normally caused by the magnet configuration being simulated being unstable and the beam failing as a result.

Hope this helps

Michael
ID: 18736 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
superempie

Send message
Joined: 28 Jul 05
Posts: 24
Credit: 6,603,623
RAC: 0
Message 18738 - Posted: 18 Dec 2007, 23:31:18 UTC

Thanks for the information. Won't report them again and will continue crunching future wu's when they are available. :)

Mark

ID: 18738 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Questions and Answers : Windows : Workunits finished in approx. 1 second


©2024 CERN