Message boards :
Number crunching :
work units??
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 18 Jun 06 Posts: 3 Credit: 54,767 RAC: 0 |
I will help you :D Thanks! |
Send message Joined: 26 Apr 06 Posts: 89 Credit: 309,235 RAC: 0 |
@ Dagorath.... I've been keeping up with this thread since I asked my question about setting the cache on my box's. I'm not that eager to to get more WU's even though it would be nice. I think I'll just "kick the client" more often rather than "hammer the server"! But thanks anyway! LOL! A clear conscience is usually the sign of a bad memory |
Send message Joined: 7 Oct 06 Posts: 114 Credit: 23,192 RAC: 0 |
:) i see the format has changed ;) good one Alex and Neasan :) just wait and see the response to this one:( Regards Masud. |
Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 42 Credit: 11,505,632 RAC: 0 |
on 3 computers i got 1 WU for each, seems to be a new way of distribute work equally over all users |
Send message Joined: 7 Oct 06 Posts: 114 Credit: 23,192 RAC: 0 |
;) Yes and the message part i dont think you read as yet ;) lmho 10/12/2007 3:42:49 PM|lhcathome|Message from server: Not sending work - last request too recent: 486 sec :( My protons crashed on take off ;) Regards Masud. |
Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 51 Credit: 72,804 RAC: 0 |
;) Yes and the message part i dont think you read as yet ;) lmho I've just posted this in the Questions & Answers area under Windows as I'm getting this on both of my machines too. |
Send message Joined: 6 Jul 06 Posts: 108 Credit: 663,175 RAC: 0 |
Yeah I am getting that as well, I did manage to get 1 WU but I can't get any more even though there is over 11,000 WU's in the queue. |
Send message Joined: 3 Aug 05 Posts: 49 Credit: 143,072 RAC: 0 |
I'm getting the same message while I have completed my workunit already. I guess the project leaders are trying to give everyone a bit of work instead of a few who get everything. I support this idea completely but it would be nice if the hosts who have allready returned results and have a empty queue could get some new work as well. BOINC.BE: The team for Belgians and their friends who love the smell of glowing red cpu's in the morning |
Send message Joined: 7 Oct 06 Posts: 114 Credit: 23,192 RAC: 0 |
LoL :) i second that motion :) must be their answer to Dagorath ;) Regards Masud. |
Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 51 Credit: 72,804 RAC: 0 |
I don't think it's even per computer, but per IP address. Only my X2 got a work unit which crashed as the x64 client isn't working properly. My P4 has had absolutely nothing. |
Send message Joined: 26 Apr 06 Posts: 89 Credit: 309,235 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 19 May 07 Posts: 4 Credit: 64,180 RAC: 0 |
It looks like they might have shut it down to fill the queue? It seems to be growing by a few per second as I'm doing refreshes. |
Send message Joined: 28 Sep 04 Posts: 728 Credit: 48,835,840 RAC: 21,187 |
Getting this message: lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:06 38 Sending scheduler request: Requested by user lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:06 39 Requesting 67266 seconds of new work lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 40 Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505] lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 41 Message from server: No work sent lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 42 Message from server: (reached daily quota of 2 results) lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 43 Deferring communication for 11 hr 34 min 57 sec lhcathome 12.10.2007 15:13:11 44 Reason: requested by project |
Send message Joined: 19 Dec 06 Posts: 22 Credit: 28 RAC: 0 |
Hi, We are releasing a Press Release today to officially Launch the LHC@HOME move to the UK. So we might expect some new users to turn up over the weekend! Please be nice to them ;-) So that they have a fighting chance of getting a job to process we changed some of the settings including the daily quota. We will change things back to normal over the first few days next week... Happy Crunching (if a little bit throttled for a few days!) Alex Owen |
Send message Joined: 19 May 07 Posts: 4 Credit: 64,180 RAC: 0 |
Getting this message: Anyone want to lay odd how long that'll last? For some reason, I thought BOINC projects were interested in performance. Um I've got an idea... Let's build a supercomputer and then put throttles on it. |
Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 42 Credit: 11,505,632 RAC: 0 |
its funny if i think of my quadcore... 2 WU arent much. |
Send message Joined: 27 Apr 06 Posts: 26 Credit: 13,559 RAC: 0 |
I got 1 wu on each of my computers that have it as a project. Something that has NEVER happened before and I am guessing I will get another for each. And I also suspect that they will up the quota when there is more work, which, judging from their post on the home page today, is quite likely ;-) Looks good to me.... Dora |
Send message Joined: 19 May 07 Posts: 4 Credit: 64,180 RAC: 0 |
its funny if i think of my quadcore... 2 WU arent much. Yep, I've got an 8 core at at work, a dual core laptop and two single cores at home. Oh well, looks like after the weekend, the open the gates. |
Send message Joined: 25 Oct 04 Posts: 83 Credit: 86,382,565 RAC: 45,408 |
I attached a few more multi core machines and they were able to get 1 or 2 work units. But it does show the up/dl server as disabled. bugger! |
Send message Joined: 19 Dec 06 Posts: 10 Credit: 10,462 RAC: 0 |
10/12/2007 4:15:35 PM|lhcathome|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work 10/12/2007 4:15:35 PM|lhcathome|Requesting 689074 seconds of new work 10/12/2007 4:15:40 PM|lhcathome|Scheduler RPC succeeded [server version 505] 10/12/2007 4:15:40 PM|lhcathome|Message from server: Not sending work - last request too recent: 3401 sec 10/12/2007 4:15:40 PM|lhcathome|Deferring communication for 1 min 0 sec 10/12/2007 4:15:40 PM|lhcathome|Reason: no work from project There must be something wrong! |
©2024 CERN