Message boards :
Number crunching :
New Flood of WU's
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 282 Credit: 1,415,417 RAC: 0 |
10.000 ready to crunch... and rising! Sysfried ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 378 Credit: 10,765 RAC: 0 |
10.000 ready to crunch... and rising! Thanks. Just clicked the update button. I'm not the LHC Alex. Just a number cruncher like everyone else here. |
![]() Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 42 Credit: 11,505,632 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Seems to be christmas!! CoM ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 282 Credit: 1,415,417 RAC: 0 |
20.000 and counting ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 13 Jul 05 Posts: 143 Credit: 263,300 RAC: 0 |
WaaHoooo!! Here we go again !! More work for the dedicated crunchers. Hang on tight, cuz I dunno just how big this thing's agonna get ..... If I've lived this long, I've gotta be that old |
![]() Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 282 Credit: 1,415,417 RAC: 0 |
WaaHoooo!! Here we go again !! doh, i missed them merry x-mas anyways! cheers, sysfried ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 38 Credit: 173,867 RAC: 0 |
:) got a few ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 Sep 04 Posts: 112 Credit: 104,059 RAC: 0 |
Got a few also but many of them seem to be erroring out.... 12/24/2006 4:43:21 AM|lhcathome|Throughput 18662 bytes/sec 12/24/2006 4:43:24 AM|lhcathome|Sending scheduler request to http://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome_cgi/cgi 12/24/2006 4:43:24 AM|lhcathome|Reason: To report completed tasks 12/24/2006 4:43:24 AM|lhcathome|Reporting 1 tasks 12/24/2006 4:43:29 AM|lhcathome|Scheduler request succeeded 12/24/2006 5:39:50 AM|lhcathome|Task wsep0.55_0.2_v650.55_0.2__1__64.319_59.329__14_16__6__35_1_sixvf_boinc322922_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 12/24/2006 5:39:50 AM|lhcathome|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 12/24/2006 5:39:50 AM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited 12/24/2006 5:39:50 AM|lhcathome|Restarting task wsep0.55_0.2_v650.55_0.2__1__64.319_59.329__14_16__6__35_1_sixvf_boinc322922_0 using sixtrack version 467 12/24/2006 6:38:35 AM|lhcathome|Task wsep0.55_0.2_v650.55_0.2__1__64.319_59.329__14_16__6__35_1_sixvf_boinc322922_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 12/24/2006 6:38:35 AM|lhcathome|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 12/24/2006 6:38:35 AM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited 12/24/2006 6:38:35 AM|lhcathome|Restarting task wsep0.55_0.2_v650.55_0.2__1__64.319_59.329__14_16__6__35_1_sixvf_boinc322922_0 using sixtrack version 467 12/24/2006 6:48:39 AM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited 12/24/2006 6:48:39 AM|lhcathome|Computation for task wsep0.55_0.2_v650.55_0.2__1__64.319_59.329__14_16__6__35_1_sixvf_boinc322922_0 finished 12/24/2006 6:48:40 AM|lhcathome|Starting task wsep0.55_0.2_v650.55_0.2__1__64.319_59.329__12_14__6__85_1_sixvf_boinc322915_1 using sixtrack version 467 12/24/2006 6:48:42 AM|lhcathome|Started upload of file wsep0.55_0.2_v650.55_0.2__1__64.319_59.329__14_16__6__35_1_sixvf_boinc322922_0_0 12/24/2006 6:48:47 AM|lhcathome|Finished upload of file wsep0.55_0.2_v650.55_0.2__1__64.319_59.329__14_16__6__35_1_sixvf_boinc322922_0_0 12/24/2006 6:48:47 AM|lhcathome|Throughput 19004 bytes/sec 12/24/2006 6:48:52 AM|lhcathome|Sending scheduler request to http://lhcathome.cern.ch/lhcathome_cgi/cgi 12/24/2006 6:48:52 AM|lhcathome|Reason: To report completed tasks 12/24/2006 6:48:52 AM|lhcathome|Reporting 1 tasks 12/24/2006 6:48:57 AM|lhcathome|Scheduler request succeeded ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 Sep 04 Posts: 112 Credit: 104,059 RAC: 0 |
Here's the specs on this box: AMD Athlon XP2400+ at Stock Speeds 1GB of PC3200 RAM ABIT NF7-2 Motherboard 80gb Western Digital IDE HDD NVIDIA GF2 MX400 Video Card Nothing special, just a basic cruncher.... Any ideas? |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 13 Jul 05 Posts: 143 Credit: 263,300 RAC: 0 |
Logan5-- Your log listings show a possible solution: 12/24/2006 5:39:50 AM|lhcathome|Task wsep0.55_0.2_v650.55_0.2__1__64.319_59.329__14_16__6__35_1_sixvf_boinc322922_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 12/24/2006 5:39:50 AM|lhcathome|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 12/24/2006 5:39:50 AM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited 12/24/2006 5:39:50 AM|lhcathome|Restarting task wsep0.55_0.2_v650.55_0.2__1__64.319_59.329__14_16__6__35_1_sixvf_boinc322922_0 using sixtrack version 467 12/24/2006 6:38:35 AM|lhcathome|Task wsep0.55_0.2_v650.55_0.2__1__64.319_59.329__14_16__6__35_1_sixvf_boinc322922_0 exited with zero status but no 'finished' file 12/24/2006 6:38:35 AM|lhcathome|If this happens repeatedly you may need to reset the project. 12/24/2006 6:38:35 AM||Rescheduling CPU: application exited First thing I'd try is resetting the project, to see if a fresh program load might clear up the problem. Your machine seems to be well-suited to the crunching task, but check for dust on your cooling fins. Running a machine 24/7 in any environment other than a "clean room" setting will pick up lots of foreign material -- and if you have a cat or dog, it's even worse ... Good Luck If I've lived this long, I've gotta be that old |
![]() Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 275 Credit: 2,652,452 RAC: 0 |
The "exited with zero status but no finished file" message can usually be ignored. It is a miscommunication between the client and the app and can be caused by changing the time clock on your host. Usually the client will fix the problem without intravention. BOINC WIKI ![]() ![]() BOINCing since 2002/12/8 |
![]() Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 282 Credit: 1,415,417 RAC: 0 |
Amazingly: Up, 17661 workunits to crunch NEW WORK! ![]() |
Send message Joined: 30 Dec 06 Posts: 2 Credit: 84 RAC: 0 |
Does this means that there were 17661 individual work units or was it 17661/5 or *5 units in all as each work unit is sent out 5 times? |
Send message Joined: 4 Oct 06 Posts: 38 Credit: 24,908 RAC: 0 |
Does this means that there were 17661 individual work units or was it 17661/5 or *5 units in all as each work unit is sent out 5 times? There were 3532 (~17661/5) different WUs to crunch at that moment. Each of the 3532 WUs were copied 5 times and sent out. (I just noticed the terminology on the main page is a little misleading stating as "xxxxx workunits in progress" while the same number is reported on the server status page as "xxxxx results in progress") Don't get distracted by shiny objects. ![]() |
©2024 CERN