I think we should restrict work units

Author	Message
darkpella Send message Joined: 11 Sep 05 Posts: 17 Credit: 306,100 RAC: 0	Message 14438 - Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 16:28:17 UTC By the way, the LHC-alpha project has just some 141510 (!!!) WUs available for crunching... but account creation is disabled! I hope not to be too much assertive, but it looks to me that having to do with the fundamenatals of the universe has somehow led the CERN-people to lose some common sense.. GIVE US GREEDY CRUNCHERS THOSE BLOODY ALPHA-WUs!!!!! ID: 14438 · Reply Quote

darkpella Send message Joined: 11 Sep 05 Posts: 17 Credit: 306,100 RAC: 0	Message 14439 - Posted: 25 Jul 2006, 16:30:00 UTC Oops, I just forgot something: ;) ID: 14439 · Reply Quote

MB Atlanos Send message Joined: 14 Jul 05 Posts: 11 Credit: 81,274 RAC: 0	Message 14445 - Posted: 26 Jul 2006, 11:51:00 UTC If I remember correctly: LHC Alpha uses the same old WUs again and again to test apps in state of development. I guess this projekt is on autopilot. And now something commpletly different: One of the mainproblems with Garfield is the lack ob a dedicaded Admin, so we have to wait again. ID: 14445 · Reply Quote

Galeon 7 Send message Joined: 24 Nov 05 Posts: 12 Credit: 8,333,730 RAC: 0	Message 14479 - Posted: 5 Aug 2006, 19:10:23 UTC - in response to Message 13379. I do not think the problem lies with the user caching the workunits. This can be easily solved by the project adjusting the deadlines as appropriate.... Ok, I have to admit I get confused easily; but, if there is no problem why does it have to be solved? I am a Geek. We surf in the dark web pages no others will enter. We stand on the router and no one may pass. We live for the Web. We die for the Web. ID: 14479 · Reply Quote

LHC@home