Message boards :
Number crunching :
Host corruption solved?
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Send message Joined: 29 Aug 05 Posts: 42 Credit: 27,102 RAC: 0 |
@Chrulle - Had some problems this morning (~12:00 UTC), but I think that was left over from overnight/yesterday. All appears well now. No host corruption after 8 uploaded results just now. Great job--looks like it's working fine! (j) James |
 Thierry Van Driessche Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 157 Credit: 82,604 RAC: 0 
|
|
Krunchin-Keith [USA] Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 209 Credit: 1,482,496 RAC: 0 |
I still have 4 of 15 that do not have a 100/day quota. Other than that they all seem to show correct information. I wrote down their current quota and will see if it changes after they report some more work. I did not see any errors on the ones I looked at as far as results validating. I am not forcing any of them with a manual update, just going to let them run and monitor the situation. |
Mr.Pernod Send message Joined: 16 Jul 05 Posts: 65 Credit: 369,728 RAC: 0 |
host 47322 is now on 4/day and slowly increasing with every succesfull result. |
|
ksba Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 40 Credit: 1,742,415 RAC: 0 |
But this message: I have this too, read. Client 4.25. But i get work, 1-2min later. I don't see any reason that i upgrade my little farm. If i really don't get any work, Ok, than is the time to worry about this.. But still not now :-) |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 137 Credit: 1,691,526 RAC: 53 |
Chrulle, do you have any plans to "manually" fix any hosts that aren't getting caught automatically? As of the last XML export (10 hours ago), I see about 1,800 hosts that are still showing invalid data. Some of them are probably no longer active. Some people probably reset the project in hopes of fixing the problem and got a new host ID. Now they can't be merged because of the bad data. It would be nice to get these hosts out of the system since they are messing up some of my stats queries. If you have no plans to do anything about them I suppose I will find a workaround on my end. - A member of The Knights Who Say NI! My BOINC stats site |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 8 Credit: 349,947 RAC: 0 |
Chrulle, do you have any plans to "manually" fix any hosts that aren't getting caught automatically? As of the last XML export (10 hours ago), I see about 1,800 hosts that are still showing invalid data. Some of them are probably no longer active. Some people probably reset the project in hopes of fixing the problem and got a new host ID. Now they can't be merged because of the bad data. It would be nice to get these hosts out of the system since they are messing up some of my stats queries. If you have no plans to do anything about them I suppose I will find a workaround on my end. Delete the lot - they are quite simple to identify. 1800 hosts that everyone no longer has to work around. |
|
Krunchin-Keith [USA] Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 209 Credit: 1,482,496 RAC: 0 |
I still have 5 of 15 that do not have a 100/day quota. Other than that they all seem to show correct information. I wrote down their current quota and will see if it changes after they report some more work. I did not see any errors on the ones I looked at as far as results validating. I am not forcing any of them with a manual update, just going to let them run and monitor the situation. about 24 hours later. They seem to be improving. 2 have gotten up to 100/day. The other 3 are not there yet, but have increased from 2 to 32, 2 to 16 and 2 to 8 so they are working on it. I would say all is OK. |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 137 Credit: 1,691,526 RAC: 53 |
Well as of right now it appears to be down to 680 hosts that are still messed up. I'm sure a few more will auto-correct themselves but eventually there will be some that will remain in their current state. It would really be great if these could be dealt with in some way as they are playing tricks with some of the queries I'm trying to write for my stats website. Trying to make a host OS breakdown table is kind of difficult when 680 hosts have some random number in the os_name field. If you really don't plan on ever fixing it, I will have to build more analysis into the XML importer to screen out bad hosts. However I would much rather have "correct" data from the source and I would think you all would rather not have a bunch of invalid data in your database either... - A member of The Knights Who Say NI! My BOINC stats site |
|
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 506 Credit: 118,619 RAC: 0 |
I will have to build more analysis into the XML importer to screen out bad hosts. However I would much rather have "correct" data from the source and I would think you all would rather not have a bunch of invalid data in your database either... Not a bad idea anyway - you don't know when a corruption might occur again, on this project or elsewhere. Gaspode the UnDressed http://www.littlevale.co.uk |
©2024 CERN