I've just upgraded to 5.2.1

Author	Message
Fuzzy Hollynoodles Send message Joined: 13 Jul 05 Posts: 51 Credit: 10,626 RAC: 0	Message 10789 - Posted: 20 Oct 2005, 6:28:44 UTC - in response to Message 10787. <blockquote><blockquote>And now there's lots of WU's from LHC, so I'll stick to my 4.72! </blockquote> Me too! Live long and crunch. </blockquote> Me too! "I'm trying to maintain a shred of dignity in this world" - Me ID: 10789 · Reply Quote

adrianxw Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 187 Credit: 705,487 RAC: 0	Message 10790 - Posted: 20 Oct 2005, 8:19:08 UTC 5.2.2 has become the recommended core client at the BOINC main site today. 4.45 and 4.19 are still there flagged as older versions. Wave upon wave of demented avengers march cheerfully out of obscurity into the dream. ID: 10790 · Reply Quote

Ocean Archer Send message Joined: 13 Jul 05 Posts: 143 Credit: 263,300 RAC: 0	Message 10793 - Posted: 20 Oct 2005, 10:58:48 UTC Last modified: 20 Oct 2005, 11:00:16 UTC I would expect that as soon as the LHC programming team can wrap themselves around the new core client version, we'll hear about it. Kinda like trying to drag the state of Mississippi kicking and screaming into the 20th Century ... If I've lived this long, I've gotta be that old ID: 10793 · Reply Quote

Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 545 Credit: 148,912 RAC: 0	Message 10804 - Posted: 20 Oct 2005, 17:27:57 UTC Well, I upgraded one of my machines to 5.2.2 now that it is official... Though I can't quite understand why it would not let me install it as a service on that machine ... ID: 10804 · Reply Quote

nubz Send message Joined: 17 Jul 05 Posts: 5 Credit: 77,636 RAC: 0	Message 10806 - Posted: 20 Oct 2005, 18:14:00 UTC - in response to Message 10793. <blockquote>I would expect that as soon as the LHC programming team can wrap themselves around the new core client version, we'll hear about it. Kinda like trying to drag the state of Mississippi kicking and screaming into the 20th Century ...</blockquote> it would be nice if lhc would upgrade to 5.2.2. if i would have known they didn't support it i wouldn't have done it. i've had problems going back to 4.45 but, i still have a few machines not upgraded. my guess is they WILL have to upgrade the server at some point. i haven't had any problem with any other projects and this new version. ID: 10806 · Reply Quote

Ocean Archer Send message Joined: 13 Jul 05 Posts: 143 Credit: 263,300 RAC: 0	Message 10807 - Posted: 20 Oct 2005, 18:22:48 UTC - in response to Message 10804. <blockquote>Well, I upgraded one of my machines to 5.2.2 now that it is official... Though I can't quite understand why it would not let me install it as a service on that machine ... </blockquote> Paul -- By any chance, is the machine you refer to above one that runs a very old version of Windows ?? Sometimes its the little things that sneak by us ... If I've lived this long, I've gotta be that old ID: 10807 · Reply Quote

Paul D. Buck Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 545 Credit: 148,912 RAC: 0	Message 10811 - Posted: 20 Oct 2005, 19:58:58 UTC - in response to Message 10807. <blockquote><blockquote>Well, I upgraded one of my machines to 5.2.2 now that it is official... Though I can't quite understand why it would not let me install it as a service on that machine ... </blockquote> Paul -- By any chance, is the machine you refer to above one that runs a very old version of Windows ?? Sometimes its the little things that sneak by us ...</blockquote> No, one of my Dell Dual Xeons ... My main account is an administrator account but when installing it says my administrator does not seem to have rights to start services. Rather strange. ID: 10811 · Reply Quote

LHC@home