Message boards :
Number crunching :
Fun
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
Send message Joined: 25 Aug 05 Posts: 42 Credit: 3,518 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 196 Credit: 207,040 RAC: 0 |
I'm sure you could on a 200 MHz Pentium-MMX running Windows 98se.. |
Send message Joined: 14 Jul 05 Posts: 4 Credit: 7,865,386 RAC: 0 |
<blockquote>has anyone had any longer than this?</blockquote> my old laptop got one of them 51 hours lol http://lhcathome.cern.ch/workunit.php?wuid=571123 |
Send message Joined: 29 Aug 05 Posts: 42 Credit: 27,102 RAC: 0 |
lmao. That's why my uber slow boxes run Einstien and Seti--more predictable WU size (~24 hours for an E@H WU)... (j) James |
Send message Joined: 25 Aug 05 Posts: 42 Credit: 3,518 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 102 Credit: 7,096,685 RAC: 2,148 |
<blockquote>I am having fun with a 5A Wu on my 856 Mhz machine. It is goung to take 22 hrs to do without rotating with other boinc.Because I am it is going to take 44 hrs to do and should I repeat should be finished round about 20:00 BT tomorrow the 21st has anyone had any longer than this?</blockquote> On one of my slower machines (PII 450/Win98se, I aborted a WU after 109 hours that still had over a 60 hours to go, and less than 15 to Deadline. |
Send message Joined: 22 Oct 04 Posts: 6 Credit: 3,413,714 RAC: 0 |
I still have a PII-350 that crunches. The lates LHC units that go the distance take about 26-27 hours if executed by themselves. If I share that machine with SETI, it feels like it's never going to be finished before the deadline, especially since you cannot leave the result in memory when you switch. Guy [img src="http://www.boincstats.com/signature/user_10138.gif"] |
©2024 CERN