Message boards :
Number crunching :
Post your Estimated vs Actual Completion Times Here.
Message board moderation
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 The Gas GiantSend message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 309 Credit: 715,258 RAC: 0 |
Just doing a general ad hoc survey on what people are seeing as the estimated completion times vs the actual completion times on their machines for the longer wu's atm. Machine- Flops/Iops- estimated- actual P4M@2.2Ghz- 1092/2209- 15hr20min- 4hr36min P4@3.7GHz- 1601/2092- 10hr38min- 4hr21min I have heard of a P3@500MHz estimating 38hrs and actually taking 1hr45min...but that must be a short wu. Just the long ones please. Live long and crunch. Paul (S@H1 8888)  BOINC/SAH BETA
|
littleBouncer Send message Joined: 23 Oct 04 Posts: 358 Credit: 1,439,205 RAC: 0 |
PM@1.5GHz- 1328/2754- 12hr33min- 4hr10min P4@3.4GHz- 1450/1818- 11hr30min- 3hr50min greetz littleBouncer   
|
|
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 35 Credit: 60,866 RAC: 0 |
Hi My Times are P42.8GHz-512C H/T 1249/1048 13:14:46 actual 4:30-5:00 I have noticed that my computer details show my CPU on the host details is 10% faster than it is and it takes an average of 13.89 days to turn a result around. My system could probale return 13.89 results in a day. <img border="0" src="http://boinc.mundayweb.com/one/stats.php?userID=2104" /> |
|
Send message Joined: 29 Sep 04 Posts: 196 Credit: 207,040 RAC: 0 |
BOINC Client 4.19/Sixtrack 4.67 (wboinc7_v6s4hvnom WUs) AMD AthlonXP 3200+ (2.2GHz) - 2058/4973 - 2:00:07 act / 8:05:53 est 
|
davidmcw Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 17 Credit: 53,515 RAC: 0 
|
BOINC Client 4.43/ sixtrack 4.67 Dell M60 laptop; 2.1GHz centrino; 2Gb RAM - 1839/ 3786 Project Estimate Actual ------- -------- ------ LHC 09:03:45 ~4.5 Einstein 06:02:30 ~5.5 SETI 04:13:04 ~1.5 |
©2025 CERN