Message boards : Number crunching : scheduler hickup?
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile sysfried

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 04
Posts: 282
Credit: 1,415,417
RAC: 0
Message 7717 - Posted: 16 May 2005, 6:50:19 UTC
Last modified: 16 May 2005, 6:52:08 UTC

If I remember correctly, the scheduler should send out work again when there not enough results in time.... right?

Look here. There are only 2 valid results. The other ones have timed out.

But no new WU's have been sent out. Is that the delay we were talking about a few days ago, Markku?

On the other hand.... Same date sent... same number of valid results... It did send out new work here

cheers,

Sysfried
ID: 7717 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
STE\/E

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 352
Credit: 1,393,150
RAC: 0
Message 7719 - Posted: 16 May 2005, 8:16:52 UTC
Last modified: 16 May 2005, 8:17:12 UTC

But no new WU's have been sent out.
==========

I've been fortunate enough to receive a few WU's the last few days dated due the 29'th & 30'th, so they have been sending out the over due ones it seems to me ... ;)
ID: 7719 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Logan5@SETI.USA
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Sep 04
Posts: 112
Credit: 104,059
RAC: 0
Message 7726 - Posted: 16 May 2005, 15:05:45 UTC - in response to Message 7719.  

> But no new WU's have been sent out.
> ==========
>
> I've been fortunate enough to receive a few WU's the last few days dated due
> the 29'th & 30'th, so they have been sending out the over due ones it
> seems to me ... ;)
>

<I>We are currently finishing "tail" of current study, that is, resubmitting work until every workunit has been processed.

After that there will be a short break (week or so) and then about one million new workunits (which makes about five million results) will be submitted.

Markku Degerholm
LHC@home admin</I>

said here
ID: 7726 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Travis DJ

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 04
Posts: 196
Credit: 207,040
RAC: 0
Message 7728 - Posted: 16 May 2005, 19:04:21 UTC - in response to Message 7726.  

@Logan5

What is it with people not reading the forums before not posting? I share in your apathy when posts like this happen. You've quoted this at least two times now on different threads and yet people still don't take the time to READ.. RTF-Message Board, folks.. :(

ID: 7728 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile sysfried

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 04
Posts: 282
Credit: 1,415,417
RAC: 0
Message 7730 - Posted: 16 May 2005, 20:30:32 UTC - in response to Message 7728.  

> What is it with people not reading the forums before not posting? I share in
> your apathy when posts like this happen. You've quoted this at least two
> times now on different threads and yet people still don't take the time to
> READ.. RTF-Message Board, folks.. :(
>
@ Logan 5 & Travis DJ.

What's the flaming about?

As Markku said "resubmitting work until every workunit has been processed."

Which I understand as: We will keep the server resubmitting units until we have the valid results....

BUT my original post pointed to a WU which at THAT point had NOT been re-submitted. A quick look at what I originally posted would have shown that.

I want to end this thread, because the WU has been send out again later today. So the issue is no longer existing.

Sincerely,

Sysfried

ID: 7730 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile The Gas Giant

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 309
Credit: 715,258
RAC: 0
Message 7731 - Posted: 16 May 2005, 21:21:28 UTC

I agree with Sysfried, at the time of the original post the wu had not been resent, but within a few hrs it had. No need to knock someone for posting what, at the time, looked like a valid beef!

It is good to see that the wu was resent and now has granted credit.

Live long and crunch!

Paul
(S@H1 8888)
BOINC/SAH BETA
ID: 7731 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Logan5@SETI.USA
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Sep 04
Posts: 112
Credit: 104,059
RAC: 0
Message 7732 - Posted: 16 May 2005, 22:47:02 UTC - in response to Message 7730.  
Last modified: 16 May 2005, 23:29:11 UTC

> >
> @ Logan 5 & Travis DJ.
>
> What's the flaming about?
>

I can only speak for myself, but <B><I>I flamed no one</B></I>. I thought you had missed the post. Nothing more or less then that.

Why are you so quick to jump to a wrong conclusion?

I guess with all the strong differences of opinion that are being offered about the direction these forums "might/should/should not" be heading, I guess that tempers are a bit short for some?? Who knows.

There was no offense meant.

:/
ID: 7732 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Travis DJ

Send message
Joined: 29 Sep 04
Posts: 196
Credit: 207,040
RAC: 0
Message 7736 - Posted: 17 May 2005, 0:14:02 UTC - in response to Message 7732.  

Ditto.
ID: 7736 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile The Gas Giant

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 309
Credit: 715,258
RAC: 0
Message 7739 - Posted: 17 May 2005, 3:21:40 UTC

Travis DJ wrote:

-----------------------
@Logan5

What is it with people not reading the forums before not posting? I share in your apathy when posts like this happen. You've quoted this at least two times now on different threads and yet people still don't take the time to READ.. RTF-Message Board, folks.. :(
-----------------------

Depending on how you read it, it reads fairly inflammatory to me.......especially the RTF....definitely not needed.

Paul.

ID: 7739 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile sysfried

Send message
Joined: 27 Sep 04
Posts: 282
Credit: 1,415,417
RAC: 0
Message 7740 - Posted: 17 May 2005, 6:47:22 UTC - in response to Message 7732.  

>
> There was no offense meant.
>
> :/
>

Ok. None taken. :-)

Let's end this thread right here. :-)
ID: 7740 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : scheduler hickup?


©2022 CERN