Message boards : Number crunching : 180k WUs but none for me ???
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

AuthorMessage
Profile irzyxel

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 29
Credit: 116,231
RAC: 0
Message 7364 - Posted: 30 Apr 2005, 21:33:54 UTC

30/04/2005 23:34:29|LHC@home|Sending request to scheduler: http://lhcathome-sched1.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi
30/04/2005 23:34:30|LHC@home|Scheduler RPC to http://lhcathome-sched1.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi succeeded

im not getting any new WUs ... is there some quota active still ?
ID: 7364 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile irzyxel

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 29
Credit: 116,231
RAC: 0
Message 7365 - Posted: 30 Apr 2005, 22:16:54 UTC

guess it was just a burp in the scheduler of boinc 4.35, the moment the very last WU was done, it also requested new work
ID: 7365 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Logan5@SETI.USA
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Sep 04
Posts: 112
Credit: 104,059
RAC: 0
Message 7366 - Posted: 30 Apr 2005, 22:35:57 UTC - in response to Message 7365.  

> guess it was just a burp in the scheduler of boinc 4.35, the moment the very
> last WU was done, it also requested new work
>

FYI:

I Beleive that Markku said in another thread that the limit was raised to 200 per host, but that's probably been removed now that there's almost 200,000 availabe Work units for little over 5,000 participants.

Enjoy the freedom of letting your clients run wild.... :)




ID: 7366 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Scottatron

Send message
Joined: 18 Sep 04
Posts: 28
Credit: 59,744
RAC: 0
Message 7368 - Posted: 30 Apr 2005, 23:53:16 UTC

Could it be that the LHC team is creating a large buffer of WUs, and then allowing a few more users to sign up?

Seems that way to me ;)
ID: 7368 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Gaspode the UnDressed

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 04
Posts: 506
Credit: 118,619
RAC: 0
Message 7370 - Posted: 1 May 2005, 3:12:29 UTC - in response to Message 7368.  

> Could it be that the LHC team is creating a large buffer of WUs, and then
> allowing a few more users to sign up?
>
It's not a very large buffer. 200,000 Wus between 5000 users is 40 WUs each. That's probably more like 15 WUs per host, or a couple of days work.



Gaspode the UnDressed
http://www.littlevale.co.uk
ID: 7370 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Logan5@SETI.USA
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 30 Sep 04
Posts: 112
Credit: 104,059
RAC: 0
Message 7371 - Posted: 1 May 2005, 4:13:54 UTC - in response to Message 7370.  

> > Could it be that the LHC team is creating a large buffer of WUs, and
> then
> > allowing a few more users to sign up?
> >
> It's not a very large buffer. 200,000 Wus between 5000 users is 40 WUs each.
> That's probably more like 15 WUs per host, or a couple of days work.
>
>
>
>

Your math can't be right because I am consistently downloading far more work then that since the glut started and before that when Markku raised the daily limit per host to about 200 I beleive it was.... I have 50 on one box, 35 on one box, 60 on another box and 40 on the last one.

Preferences are set for 7 days worth of work and with the 4.35 dev client, it throttles the work based on what it thinks the CPU can handle.



ID: 7371 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Gaspode the UnDressed

Send message
Joined: 1 Sep 04
Posts: 506
Credit: 118,619
RAC: 0
Message 7376 - Posted: 1 May 2005, 9:11:06 UTC

>>Your math can't be right

My maths is just an average. While you've been getting 50+ units on a host, I've been getting about 3, but then my preference is set for 0.1 days of work, by and large.

Mike W



Gaspode the UnDressed
http://www.littlevale.co.uk
ID: 7376 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Contact
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 04
Posts: 53
Credit: 1,746,200
RAC: 1,684
Message 7384 - Posted: 2 May 2005, 1:32:33 UTC - in response to Message 7368.  

> Could it be that the LHC team is creating a large buffer of WUs, and then
> allowing a few more users to sign up?
>
> Seems that way to me ;)
>
Been thinking the same.
Especially since reading Thierry Van Driessche’s post a few days ago
here.
Very exciting!

ID: 7384 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote

Message boards : Number crunching : 180k WUs but none for me ???


©2024 CERN