Message boards : Number crunching : v64lhc.D1-D2-MQonly-inj-no-skew-1s6_8588.2693_1_sixvf_51.zip...???
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 · 2

AuthorMessage
Digitalis
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 19
Credit: 26,799
RAC: 0
Message 7135 - Posted: 21 Apr 2005, 16:38:39 UTC - in response to Message 7134.  

> > Got 29 wu's on a Linux (FC3) machine over the last few hours, non for XP.
> The
> > first three have completed in 10, 15 and 45 mins. The first 2 have shown
> up as
> > pending but the claimed credit is small. I noticed the app has also
> updated
> > from 4.64 to 4.66. No sign of a graphic in cc4.35.
> >
>
> Strange, all mine are 4.67
>
Linux is always different than windows ;) My Xp machine just downloaded 4.67 with 18 wu's so all is still well.
Get BOINC WIKIed

ID: 7135 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Prototype

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 04
Posts: 1
Credit: 15,780
RAC: 0
Message 7137 - Posted: 21 Apr 2005, 17:22:14 UTC

Got 45 of these in all, 17 on the slowpoke and 28 on the other.

2 are finished already, 1 finished in 3 seconds, 1 the counter never reached 1 second (still says "---" but is "ready to report").

Weird units indeed.

ID: 7137 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile littleBouncer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Oct 04
Posts: 358
Credit: 1,439,205
RAC: 0
Message 7138 - Posted: 21 Apr 2005, 17:39:45 UTC
Last modified: 21 Apr 2005, 17:44:04 UTC

There is nothing unusal

s16_ and s18_ are 'fast' WU's.

s6_ is the base and will take the predicted time (about 1 hour)

all others are shorter (you can transforme the table in the thread 'some discoveries....'

greetz littleBouncer

BTW: Bases are loaded, let's chrunch'em (sorry: process them;-))

ID: 7138 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Perle
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 25 Oct 04
Posts: 83
Credit: 56,960,795
RAC: 34,972
Message 7145 - Posted: 22 Apr 2005, 0:55:34 UTC

One thing I have noticed is how LHC is being very selective about which machines actually get work units.

Lately, we can all agree the that WU's have been sparse. But usually my AMD64 3200 and my AMD 3200 Barton have been consistently getting work at a much higher rate than the rest of my machines.

So my point is ..... only my fastest machines have been getting work.

Untill day....everything got several new LHC WU's in the Q' ... woots for me.


ID: 7145 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile PlaNed
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Sep 04
Posts: 18
Credit: 28,898
RAC: 0
Message 7152 - Posted: 22 Apr 2005, 10:45:23 UTC

437649 92811 21 Apr 2005 15:05:55 UTC 22 Apr 2005 10:40:05 UTC Over Success Done 0.00 0.00 0.00
437629 92807 21 Apr 2005 15:05:55 UTC 22 Apr 2005 10:40:05 UTC Over Success Done 0.00 0.00 0.01
437626 92806 21 Apr 2005 15:05:55 UTC 22 Apr 2005 10:40:05 UTC Over Success Done 0.00 0.00 0.03
437618 92805 21 Apr 2005 15:05:55 UTC 22 Apr 2005 10:40:05 UTC Over Success Done 0.00 0.00 pending
437602 92801 21 Apr 2005 15:05:55 UTC 22 Apr 2005 10:40:05 UTC Over Success Done 0.00 0.00 0.00

:o)
ID: 7152 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
STE\/E

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 352
Credit: 1,393,150
RAC: 0
Message 7153 - Posted: 22 Apr 2005, 11:11:56 UTC
Last modified: 22 Apr 2005, 11:21:17 UTC

0_o

429392 91160 21 Apr 2005 13:30:37 UTC 22 Apr 2005 9:44:21 UTC Over Success Done 5.07 6.94
429361 91154 21 Apr 2005 13:30:37 UTC 22 Apr 2005 9:43:21 UTC Over Success Done 5.07 pending
429206 91123 21 Apr 2005 13:30:07 UTC 22 Apr 2005 7:46:06 UTC Over Success Done 5.08 5.25
429201 91122 21 Apr 2005 13:30:07 UTC 22 Apr 2005 6:47:06 UTC Over Success Done 5.08 pending
429196 91121 21 Apr 2005 13:30:07 UTC 22 Apr 2005 5:48:06 UTC Over Success Done 5.08 pending
429191 91120 21 Apr 2005 13:30:07 UTC 22 Apr 2005 4:49:06 UTC Over Success Done 5.07 pending
429186 91119 21 Apr 2005 13:30:07 UTC 22 Apr 2005 3:50:08 UTC Over Success Done 5.09 pending
429181 91118 21 Apr 2005 13:30:07 UTC 22 Apr 2005 2:51:06 UTC Over Success Done 5.09 5.25
429176 91117 21 Apr 2005 13:30:07 UTC 22 Apr 2005 1:51:52 UTC Over Success Done 5.08 5.28
429171 91116 21 Apr 2005 13:30:07 UTC 22 Apr 2005 1:02:51 UTC Over Success Done 5.06 5.25
429166 91115 21 Apr 2005 13:30:07 UTC 22 Apr 2005 8:45:06 UTC Over Success Done 5.08 7.02
ID: 7153 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Steven Purvis

Send message
Joined: 28 Sep 04
Posts: 2
Credit: 4,038,597
RAC: 1,835
Message 7156 - Posted: 22 Apr 2005, 15:45:25 UTC

>>So my point is ..... only my fastest machines have been getting work.

I know I don't have many computers, but my slower computer has got many more units that my faster one. Seems a bit strange, as I'm not sure they would normally finish before the required date.
ID: 7156 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Paul D. Buck

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 545
Credit: 148,912
RAC: 0
Message 7157 - Posted: 22 Apr 2005, 16:11:43 UTC

In my case, my fastest and my slowest (and a couple in between) all have work...

Though, with the front page indicating "Out of Work" (again) we have run them dry again ... sigh ...
ID: 7157 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile littleBouncer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Oct 04
Posts: 358
Credit: 1,439,205
RAC: 0
Message 7158 - Posted: 22 Apr 2005, 16:34:08 UTC
Last modified: 22 Apr 2005, 16:36:54 UTC

[QUOTE from Paul]
Though, with the front page indicating "Out of Work" (again) we have run them dry again ... sigh ...
[/QUOTE]

With this 'up and down' it is also difficult to line-up ( or synchronize ) the CPID with other projects!
no probs with those 100'000 turns WU so fare (finger crossed)

greetz littleBouncer
(on the run for the first 100 K)

ID: 7158 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Paul D. Buck

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 545
Credit: 148,912
RAC: 0
Message 7164 - Posted: 22 Apr 2005, 21:10:50 UTC - in response to Message 7158.  
Last modified: 22 Apr 2005, 21:11:22 UTC

> [QUOTE from Paul]
> Though, with the front page indicating "Out of Work" (again) we have run them
> dry again ... sigh ...
> [/QUOTE]
>
> With this 'up and down' it is also difficult to line-up ( or synchronize ) the
> CPID with other projects!
> no probs with those 100'000 turns WU so fare (finger crossed)

Worse, my standing is going down, [sob] ... :)

I remember those old carefree days when work was abundent and all was right with the world ...

At least we are still seeing improvements in the systems. UCB is doing a full back-up, Einstein@Home is doing a hardware upgrade, and Predictor@Home is giving us work like there is no tomorrow ...

Oh, yes, CPDN has found the trickle not saved problem ...
ID: 7164 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
STE\/E

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 352
Credit: 1,393,150
RAC: 0
Message 7178 - Posted: 23 Apr 2005, 12:07:40 UTC
Last modified: 23 Apr 2005, 12:09:45 UTC

There is nothing unusal

s16_ and s18_ are 'fast' WU's.

s6_ is the base and will take the predicted time (about 1 hour)
==========

After running Hundreds of these Monkey WU's I don't think they follow the same Pattern as the v64Boince6ib Type WU's...I agree some of the s18 WU's are very fast, some are done in a matter of a few seconds even. But some of the s18 WU's can take me close to an hour to do also just the same as the s6 WU's ...

Careful observation of the Monkey WU's has shown me that it doesn't matter much what they are, s6, s8, s10, s12, s14, s16, or s18, they all seem to take about the same amount of time. Only a few of the s18's every now & then will take a short amount of time.

I have noticed this same Pattern across all my PC's and it doesn't seem to vary ... In fact I'm running a s18 right now on a P4 3.4 Computer that will take 52 minutes to run, this is in HT Mode for the P4 ...
ID: 7178 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile littleBouncer
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Oct 04
Posts: 358
Credit: 1,439,205
RAC: 0
Message 7182 - Posted: 23 Apr 2005, 16:00:21 UTC - in response to Message 7178.  

As usual PoorBoy's bla bla.......
ID: 7182 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
STE\/E

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 352
Credit: 1,393,150
RAC: 0
Message 7183 - Posted: 23 Apr 2005, 17:10:45 UTC - in response to Message 7182.  

> As usual PoorBoy's bla bla.......
==========
Kiss my ars LB and go cry over your missing Credits ...
ID: 7183 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Profile Alex

Send message
Joined: 2 Sep 04
Posts: 378
Credit: 10,765
RAC: 0
Message 7184 - Posted: 23 Apr 2005, 18:41:52 UTC
Last modified: 23 Apr 2005, 18:46:40 UTC

Drama Ensues!
ID: 7184 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 · 2

Message boards : Number crunching : v64lhc.D1-D2-MQonly-inj-no-skew-1s6_8588.2693_1_sixvf_51.zip...???


©2022 CERN