Message boards :
Number crunching :
New units
Message board moderation
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 17 Credit: 53,515 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Just got some - whay hey... |
Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 22 Credit: 4,026 RAC: 0 |
> Just got some - whay hey... > I just got 2 v64boince6 WUs without a new client. It seems that they decided to give out some more work before upgrading the client. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 157 Credit: 82,604 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Server Status Up, 3542 workunits to crunch 62 concurrent connections Best greetings from Belgium Thierry |
![]() Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 34 Credit: 4,133 RAC: 0 |
It is quite curious but see what happened with the new units received today: 21/03/2005 18:31:41|climateprediction.net|Pausing result 2pem_100147514_1 (removed from memory) 21/03/2005 18:31:41|LHC@home|Starting result v64boince6ib1-10s12_14675_1_sixvf_20385_2 using sixtrack version 4.64 21/03/2005 18:31:44|climateprediction.net|Restarting result 2pem_100147514_1 using hadsm3 version 4.04 21/03/2005 18:31:44|LHC@home|Pausing result v64boince6ib1-10s12_14675_1_sixvf_20385_2 (removed from memory) As you may see, the unit started at 18:31:41 and it was paused at 18:31:44 This to me just looks real strange!! It has not gone back to the unit, and it is neither in CPDN now - crunching E@H. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 17 Sep 04 Posts: 52 Credit: 247,983 RAC: 0 |
|
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 59 Credit: 317,857 RAC: 0 |
> It is quite curious but see what happened with the new units received today: > > 21/03/2005 18:31:41|climateprediction.net|Pausing result 2pem_100147514_1 > (removed from memory) > 21/03/2005 18:31:41|LHC@home|Starting result > v64boince6ib1-10s12_14675_1_sixvf_20385_2 using sixtrack version 4.64 > 21/03/2005 18:31:44|climateprediction.net|Restarting result 2pem_100147514_1 > using hadsm3 version 4.04 > 21/03/2005 18:31:44|LHC@home|Pausing result > v64boince6ib1-10s12_14675_1_sixvf_20385_2 (removed from memory) > > > As you may see, the unit started at 18:31:41 and it was paused at 18:31:44 > > This to me just looks real strange!! It has not gone back to the unit, > and it is neither in CPDN now - crunching E@H. > I've seen this before, especially after a projects has been down for a while and you run out of WU. Boinc needs to figure out how to reallocate the time slices. It should start sorting things out properly after a few hours. Questions? Answers are in the BOINC Wiki. Boinc V6.10.56 Recommended WinXP C2D 2.1G 3GB |
![]() Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 545 Credit: 148,912 RAC: 0 |
Bruno, Your signature says that "Help us increase this number: 3.44" and yet when I click on the link, well, since the opening page does not have a similar plea it is kind of hard to figure out why I might want to help out ... A numeric value with no context is just a number ... |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Oct 04 Posts: 358 Credit: 1,439,205 RAC: 0 |
> Bruno, > > Your signature says that "Help us increase this number: 3.44" and yet when I > click on the link, well, since the opening page does not have a similar plea > it is kind of hard to figure out why I might want to help out ... > > A numeric value with no context is just a number ... > It is now on "3.52" ; somebody/-ones has/have had a 'heard' to help!!! greetz from Switzerland littleBouncer ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 545 Credit: 148,912 RAC: 0 |
> It is now on "3.52" ; somebody/-ones has/have had a 'heard' to help!!! Yes, well, 3.52 *WHAT* is still the question ... |
Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 108 Credit: 8,379,042 RAC: 62 ![]() ![]() |
> > It is now on "3.52" ; somebody/-ones has/have had a 'heard' to help!!! > > Yes, well, 3.52 *WHAT* is still the question ... > > Total GigaFlops for the team. If you click in his sig, there is a light blue box just to the right of the first paragraph ![]() ![]() |
![]() Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 545 Credit: 148,912 RAC: 0 |
> Total GigaFlops for the team. > > If you click in his sig, there is a light blue box just to the right of the > first paragraph Thanks, I don't think it was there before ... or I just missed it ... |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 506 Credit: 118,619 RAC: 0 |
|
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Oct 04 Posts: 358 Credit: 1,439,205 RAC: 0 |
|
![]() Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 282 Credit: 1,415,417 RAC: 0 |
> Up, out of work > > I have just all eaten!:-) > > > greetz littleBouncer > > > i got a bunch of work, too! ![]() |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Oct 04 Posts: 358 Credit: 1,439,205 RAC: 0 |
> i got a bunch of work, too! > Congrats!!! I've just reported 18 WU's (all >s12_) for only 24 pending credits. only 1 (s18_) with 0 CPU-time. (the rest (about 20) are 'big' boince's (5times s4_ !, will take about 12 hours each)) (on 2 hosts with 3 instances) greetz littleBouncer [EDIT]it was a big 'rush' at 16:00 UTC today! Wie in der Löwengrube...[/EDIT] |
Send message Joined: 24 Oct 04 Posts: 79 Credit: 257,762 RAC: 0 |
Heck the workunits went so fast only 2 of my 4 boxes got hooked up with work. Someone said 1500+ to crunch and it must of went in less than an hour.....If I had just left a little later this am.... would have loaded up the other 2 :( funny it was my fastest and slowest machine that got loaded lol |
Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 59 Credit: 317,857 RAC: 0 |
Great the first time in a week I suspend LHC and they release some WU. My timming is real bad.... When are we likely to have another test batch. Questions? Answers are in the BOINC Wiki. Boinc V6.10.56 Recommended WinXP C2D 2.1G 3GB |
Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 108 Credit: 8,379,042 RAC: 62 ![]() ![]() |
> Heck the workunits went so fast only 2 of my 4 boxes got hooked up with work. > Someone said 1500+ to crunch and it must of went in less than an hour.....If I > had just left a little later this am.... would have loaded up the other 2 :( > funny it was my fastest and slowest machine that got loaded lol > Was my one slowest machine that got a WU! ![]() ![]() |
Send message Joined: 17 Sep 04 Posts: 69 Credit: 26,714 RAC: 0 |
> Great the first time in a week I suspend LHC and they release some WU. My > timming is real bad.... When are we likely to have another test batch. > > I feel for you, I've been online for pretty much days, until yesterday morning at 9:30 EST 1530UTC when I went to my uncles funeral service. man 30 minutes after I leave. sheeesh tony |
©2025 CERN