jiiippeee the first WU from LHC!

Author	Message
ric Send message Joined: 17 Sep 04 Posts: 190 Credit: 649,637 RAC: 0	Message 5678 - Posted: 21 Feb 2005, 15:21:25 UTC Thankyou LHC Dev! 21.02.2005 16:16:29\|LHC@home\|Requesting 43200.00 seconds of work 21.02.2005 16:16:29\|LHC@home\|Sending request to scheduler: http://lxfsrk4101.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi 21.02.2005 16:16:47\|LHC@home\|Scheduler RPC to http://lxfsrk4101.cern.ch/scheduler/cgi succeeded 21.02.2005 16:16:47\|LHC@home\|Message from server: You may have an outdated code verification key. This may prevent you from accepting new executables. If the problem persists, detach/attach the project. 21.02.2005 16:16:47\|LHC@home\|New host venue: school 21.02.2005 16:16:47\|LHC@home\|Host location: school 21.02.2005 16:16:47\|LHC@home\|Using separate project prefs for school 21.02.2005 16:16:48\|LHC@home\|Started download of sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe 21.02.2005 16:16:48\|LHC@home\|Started download of v64boince6ib1-39s14_16615_1_sixvf_1666.zip 21.02.2005 16:17:03\|\|May run out of work in 0.50 days; requesting more 21.02.2005 16:17:03\|Einstein@Home\|Requesting 4140.92 seconds of work 21.02.2005 16:17:03\|Einstein@Home\|Sending request to scheduler: http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/EinsteinAtHome_cgi/cgi 21.02.2005 16:17:06\|Einstein@Home\|Scheduler RPC to http://einstein.phys.uwm.edu/EinsteinAtHome_cgi/cgi succeeded 21.02.2005 16:17:07\|LHC@home\|Finished download of v64boince6ib1-39s14_16615_1_sixvf_1666.zip 21.02.2005 16:17:07\|LHC@home\|Throughput 20703 bytes/sec 21.02.2005 16:17:07\|LHC@home\|Started download of v64boince6ib1-39s14_16630_1_sixvf_1667.zip 21.02.2005 16:17:24\|LHC@home\|Finished download of sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe 21.02.2005 16:17:24\|LHC@home\|Throughput 75538 bytes/sec 21.02.2005 16:17:24\|LHC@home\|Finished download of v64boince6ib1-39s14_16630_1_sixvf_1667.zip 21.02.2005 16:17:24\|LHC@home\|Throughput 23223 bytes/sec 21.02.2005 16:17:24\|LHC@home\|signature verification error for sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe 21.02.2005 16:17:24\|LHC@home\|Checksum or signature error for sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe 21.02.2005 16:17:24\|LHC@home\|Unrecoverable error for result v64boince6ib1-39s14_16615_1_sixvf_1666_1 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe -120 signature verification error) 21.02.2005 16:17:24\|LHC@home\|Unrecoverable error for result v64boince6ib1-39s14_16630_1_sixvf_1667_0 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe -120 signature verification error) 21.02.2005 16:17:25\|LHC@home\|Deferring communication with project for 59 seconds OK there where DL error and probaly it's on initial delivering tests Thats a good outlook! keep on and good luck ID: 5678 · Reply Quote

sysfried Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 282 Credit: 1,415,417 RAC: 0	Message 5679 - Posted: 21 Feb 2005, 15:40:30 UTC - in response to Message 5678. I got some errors too, but my client managed to fetch some work! :-) > Thankyou LHC Dev! > > 21.02.2005 16:16:29\|LHC@home\|Requesti...... ID: 5679 · Reply Quote

Markku Degerholm Send message Joined: 3 Sep 04 Posts: 212 Credit: 4,545 RAC: 0	Message 5681 - Posted: 21 Feb 2005, 17:39:55 UTC - in response to Message 5678. > 21.02.2005 16:16:47\|LHC@home\|Message from server: You may have an outdated > code verification key. This may prevent you from accepting new executables. > If the problem persists, detach/attach the project. ... > 21.02.2005 16:17:24\|LHC@home\|Checksum or signature error for > sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe This is because we are using new server-side sign keys. But there should be a mechanism in BOINC which allows updating the keys by signing of the new public code sign key using the old private code sign key. But apparently there is something wrong in the setup. Must look upon the matter. Markku Degerholm LHC@home admin ID: 5681 · Reply Quote

Markku Degerholm Send message Joined: 3 Sep 04 Posts: 212 Credit: 4,545 RAC: 0	Message 5683 - Posted: 21 Feb 2005, 18:00:45 UTC I think I fixed that now. However, I'm unable to test it. Please inform if any of you still gets "You may have an outdated code verification key." message. Generally speaking, it's not a good idea to accept a badly-signed executable (by resetting the project)... If somebody is able to hack into our server, the hacker is able to send the users any code he wants to be executed (like password sniffer, smap server, etc). Markku Degerholm LHC@home admin ID: 5683 · Reply Quote

[SETI.USA]Tank_Master Send message Joined: 17 Sep 04 Posts: 22 Credit: 983,416 RAC: 0	Message 5691 - Posted: 21 Feb 2005, 18:38:03 UTC I am running a P4 3.2 on boinc 4.66 and server 2003 (w/ SP1) I have gotten the following messages 3 times, all for the same file (sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe). Times are in Pacific Time: 2/21/2005 10:25:39 AM\|LHC@home\|Finished download of sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe 2/21/2005 10:25:39 AM\|LHC@home\|Throughput 54142 bytes/sec 2/21/2005 10:25:39 AM\|LHC@home\|signature verification error for sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe 2/21/2005 10:25:39 AM\|LHC@home\|Checksum or signature error for sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe 2/21/2005 10:25:39 AM\|LHC@home\|Unrecoverable error for result v64boince6ib1-15s18_20660_1_sixvf_719_9 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe -120 signature verification error) 2/21/2005 10:25:39 AM\|LHC@home\|Unrecoverable error for result v64boince6ib1-21s10_12660_1_sixvf_939_8 (app_version download error: couldn't get input files: sixtrack_4.63_windows_intelx86.exe -120 signature verification error) 2/21/2005 10:25:40 AM\|LHC@home\|Deferring communication with project for 59 seconds In between each one, I got the error "project is down" (most likely do to the database overload) After the third fail of the "checksum error" I got for 2 times in a row (I forced an update about 5 min after this failed attempt and got the same message): 2/21/2005 10:30:07 AM\|LHC@home\|Message from server: You may have an outdated code verification key. This may prevent you from accepting new executables. If the problem persists, detach/attach the project. 2/21/2005 10:30:07 AM\|LHC@home\|No work from project 2/21/2005 10:30:07 AM\|LHC@home\|Deferring communication with project for 1 hours, 0 minutes, and 0 seconds ~Keith ID: 5691 · Reply Quote

[SETI.USA]Tank_Master Send message Joined: 17 Sep 04 Posts: 22 Credit: 983,416 RAC: 0	Message 5692 - Posted: 21 Feb 2005, 18:48:14 UTC I detached and reattached the project like the last error message said to do, after 3 attempts to reattach, it finally did, and the checksum error did NOT reappear. All files downloaded ok. Both work units are now in "ready to run" status. Its computing for other projects at the moment. ~Keith ID: 5692 · Reply Quote

Thierry Van Driessche Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 157 Credit: 82,604 RAC: 0	Message 5693 - Posted: 21 Feb 2005, 18:49:23 UTC - in response to Message 5683. Last modified: 21 Feb 2005, 18:50:35 UTC > I think I fixed that now. However, I'm unable to test it. Please inform if any > of you still gets "You may have an outdated code verification key." message. > > Generally speaking, it's not a good idea to accept a badly-signed executable > (by resetting the project)... If somebody is able to hack into our server, the > hacker is able to send the users any code he wants to be executed (like > password sniffer, smap server, etc). Nice to see you back Markku. LHC@home - 2005-02-21 19:30:06 - Message from server: You may have an outdated code verification key. This may prevent you from accepting new executables. If the problem persists, detach/attach the project. LHC@home - 2005-02-21 19:30:35 - Message from server: You may have an outdated code verification key. This may prevent you from accepting new executables. If the problem persists, detach/attach the project. Time is UTC +1h. I detached and attached again. By doing so, it went fine. Only had to merge PC as an identical one was creating by detach/attach. All files were downloaded without any problem. Ready to crunch. Best greetings from Belgium Thierry ID: 5693 · Reply Quote

Astro Send message Joined: 17 Sep 04 Posts: 69 Credit: 26,714 RAC: 0	Message 5696 - Posted: 21 Feb 2005, 18:52:56 UTC I'm right there with you. I'm downloading 6 WU as we speak. Hi all tony Formerly mmciastro. Name and avatar changed for a change The New Online Helpsytem help is just a call away. ID: 5696 · Reply Quote

Professor Desty Nova Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 34 Credit: 199,018 RAC: 0	Message 5698 - Posted: 21 Feb 2005, 18:55:56 UTC After noticing those errors with the signing key, and detaching/ trying to reatach several times, I finally got several WU :-)))) Professor Desty Nova Researching Karma the Hard Way ID: 5698 · Reply Quote

LHC@home