Message boards :
Number crunching :
Official Word on no more Work Units...!!!!
Message board moderation
Previous · 1 · 2 · 3 · 4 · 5 · 6 · 7 · Next
Author | Message |
---|---|
![]() Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 126 Credit: 49,653 RAC: 0 |
> I rarely need something pointed out to me and have been known for decades as a > person that never needs directions since I tend to have to know and learn > anything of importance without suggestions (well that is my Law of Quantum > Memory Dynamics anyway) Just what we need, another Message Board Deity in the form of JAHMAGIC. It appears that your devotion to study hasn't endowed you with any real wisdom. Oh, and by the way, could we have a little more attitude please. |
Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 5 Credit: 739,428 RAC: 0 |
This is a useless thread, i gave up reading a long time ago I thought it might have sime information but its nothing but folks arguing It would be nice to have know but I not going to look here again....... |
Send message Joined: 27 Sep 04 Posts: 5 Credit: 739,428 RAC: 0 |
> > This is a useless thread, i gave up reading a long time ago > > I thought it might have sime information but its nothing but folks arguing > > It would be nice to have know but I not going to look here again....... > > >It might be useful to answer the question and lock the thread..just a thought |
![]() Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 71 Credit: 28,399 RAC: 0 |
> they're wrong, and that, my meddlesome friend, reeks of stupidity. The only > comments out of line here are yours. "could we have a little more attitude please"? LOL |
![]() Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 34 Credit: 4,133 RAC: 0 |
Sorry to say, that I have been receiving units for analysis during the past 3 days and right now I have 6 more to be processed and later returned. What I do not see, is that they are shown on the pending credit list of my account. Does anybody else have the same problem? Patience is a virtue |
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 352 Credit: 1,748,908 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
@Lberto If you got Credit for them already they won't show up in the Pending List ... Right now a lot of them are getting instant credit as soon as they are turned in ... |
![]() Send message Joined: 18 Sep 04 Posts: 34 Credit: 4,133 RAC: 0 |
> @Lberto > > If you got Credit for them already they won't show up in the Pending List ... > Right now a lot of them are getting instant credit as soon as they are turned > in ... > Thanks Poor Boy, that is what I just noticed, so that must be the case. Any more fresh news? Patience is a virtue |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 Sep 04 Posts: 112 Credit: 104,059 RAC: 0 |
So, is the current drought/lack of LHC Work because the project's finally moving over to their new servers/etc...? There's been no peep on this in the official places, so we're all left just speculating and taking threads like this FAR off topic.... :/ ANY "Official" word would be appreciated on this. Tx. -L5 |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 17 Sep 04 Posts: 103 Credit: 38,543 RAC: 0 ![]() |
Actually, I feel sorry for you. You seem like you are mad at the world. Nothing is ever good enough for you. Personally, i would bet you are not happy with yourself and your life so you are trying to make up for it by trashing people who are working hard on a project that has never been attempted before. Jim , you'll > have to forgive me if I seem a little impatient with the Seti Site because > they've done nothing but screw just about everybody that runs there and their > still doing it from the Message Board Posts that I see. > > |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 24 Oct 04 Posts: 1196 Credit: 64,311,996 RAC: 100,778 ![]() ![]() |
Well it is nice to see a 8:34:26 tunescana finished off as a 5:33:09 tunescana! Time for a bunch of proelevens and protwelves now ![]() *Samson Ben Yoseph* |
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 352 Credit: 1,748,908 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
You seem like you are mad at the world. Nothing is ever good enough for you. ========= Yes your right, but you know what really pisses me off is that people like you who think they are self professed Psychologists & know all about somebody else's life and personality haven't been eradicated from the World yet, I'll have to work harder on that ... It's not my fault that I was Born Perfect & that I demand Perfection from all else ... I guess in your case your willing to run on 4 cylinders when 8 are available ... What if Joseph Swan, a British inventor had just struck a match and said, Well thats good enough for me, we may all still be running around holding a match stick for lighting instead of actually having Light Bulbs. Of course that would probably be good enough for you I guess since you don't seem to care if things ain't right and seem to be willing to settle for less ... Don't feel sorry for me, feel sorry for yourself because at least I have the fortitude to let them know things need to be fixed instead of sitting idly by & willing to accept less .. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Oct 04 Posts: 358 Credit: 1,439,205 RAC: 0 |
copy scratched |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 23 Oct 04 Posts: 358 Credit: 1,439,205 RAC: 0 |
> The day we see a LHC Work Unit labeled > v64-Guido-seventeen > THEN, the word "Tweak" could be used in a "common sense" way. > > If I wounded somebody, I do offer my apology. > > ric ====== agreed that ====== (I wait for those days too) Seid gegrüsst Programme ; it's chrunching time |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 14 Credit: 168,153 RAC: 0 |
http://lhcathome.cern.ch/forum_thread.php?id=580 |
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 352 Credit: 1,748,908 RAC: 0 ![]() ![]() |
Yes, I remember hat thread PCZ as I had a few responses in it myself, I never thought much of it one way or the other. It's just a computer ranking and doesn't affect your total credit 1 way or the other. |
![]() ![]() Send message Joined: 30 Sep 04 Posts: 112 Credit: 104,059 RAC: 0 |
Ok....Let's try this again. Putting aside all the Off Topic namecalling & threadcrapping that's apparently allowed to run rampant here, can ANYONE put together a coherent answer to the question of what's the "OFFICIAL" last day of the LHC Project where they transition to the new server(s) and redesign the interface model? "sometime in November or December" is really not a very accurate timeframe. If it's already happened, it would have been nice to have some kind of notification. If it's not happened yet, it would be nice to have some kind of notification when it does.... |
Send message Joined: 1 Sep 04 Posts: 506 Credit: 118,619 RAC: 0 |
Not an 'official' answer, but... The schedule according to the report is to take the project down mid to late November. Since we are now mid-November that means that CERN are now waiting to get the last results back, and the project will then go off line. I expect to see the last of it in early December. Given the fun Predictor are having, and bearing in mind that Christmas will blight progress everywhere for three weeks I expect we'll see LHC@Home back in the New Year - maybe mid February. Meanwhile, I remain connected and pick up a few late WUs, and run SETI and CPDN. In the new year we have Einstein@Home to look forward to, and hopefully Predictor will be back. Astropulse (from the SETI team) is under way again (more scientific than SETI, IMO) and may become available soon. That should keep us all busy for the foreseeable future. Happy crunching! Giskard - the first telepathic robot. |
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 16 Credit: 15,568 RAC: 0 |
> Astropulse (from the SETI team) is under way again > (more scientific than SETI, IMO) and may become available soon. Perhaps it is more likely to produce successful or practical results. However, I do not see how either project is "more scientific" than the other? |
Send message Joined: 17 Sep 04 Posts: 190 Credit: 649,637 RAC: 0 |
>I do not see how either project is "more scientific" than the other? this descision is done by the individual user hime/herself. The user is mature enough to select the favorites projects. Boinc or not boinc related. no need for a guardian ;-) --> much more in focus should be: never say never! got work from LHC, today, about 15h30 swiss local time. deadline dated 29. of November The alarm, was belling because no progress for the 2 SETI WUs (HT cpu). Took a closer look, why the clients was alarming cool, 50 LHC Workunits downloaded, client was following the preemting rules and paused the less prioritied seti work. Unfortunately (so far) only one clients got work. :-( Sunday I got some pirates! work and now today LHC, keep attached with your favorites projecs.. |
Send message Joined: 2 Sep 04 Posts: 16 Credit: 15,568 RAC: 0 |
> >I do not see how either project is "more scientific" than the other? > > this descision is done by the individual user hime/herself. > The user is mature enough to select the favorites projects. > Boinc or not boinc related. > > no need for a guardian ;-) > Wasn't trying to influence anyone on which project they chose, or to say that any project is better than another. I was just saying that there is nothing inherently "more scientific" about either SETI or Astropulse (or LHC or CPDN or Predictor, etc.). And, I completely agree that any user should select the projects in which they participate. |
©2025 CERN