Posts by Uffe F

21) Message boards : Number crunching : Well That Was Strange (Message 27037) Posted 11 Dec 2014 by Uffe F Post: They just keep coming and wasting power. I think i will put on hold for a little time (until it's fixed), because its a lot of wasted resources. Then I will happely come back and chrunch.
22) Message boards : Number crunching : Well That Was Strange (Message 27032) Posted 10 Dec 2014 by Uffe F Post: Same here. Got some new that can't validate.
23) Message boards : Number crunching : Well That Was Strange (Message 27024) Posted 5 Dec 2014 by Uffe F Post: Had 41 errors with the same here.
24) Message boards : Number crunching : Error while Computing (Message 26769) Posted 2 Oct 2014 by Uffe F Post: Having the same error here.
25) Message boards : Number crunching : old tasks not deleted (Message 26739) Posted 2 Sep 2014 by Uffe F Post: There is also 37 old ones from february/march 2013 on my account. Wonder why they are still there? You can't see the actual workunits when you click them anymore. Maybe there is generally a lot of stuck tasks from that period on peoples account.
26) Message boards : Number crunching : Still Pending? (Message 26731) Posted 15 Aug 2014 by Uffe F Post: It validated, so the problem was solved for me at least :)
27) Message boards : Number crunching : Still Pending? (Message 26727) Posted 11 Aug 2014 by Uffe F Post: I have one similar http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/workunit.php?wuid=19744849
28) Message boards : News : Dynamic Aperture Tune Scan (Message 25496) Posted 17 Mar 2013 by Uffe F Post: I was lucky and finally got 6 Tasks this morning which are all being crunched (Windows 7, INTEL i7-2600) but generally most are grabbed almost as soon as they are pushed to the server. At one time there was a limitation on how many Tasks could be "grabbed" by a single account. This was done so that more people could participate. In fact it also resulted in Tasks getting turned around quicker because they weren't setting on someone's machines waiting to run. That rule is still there, I can "only" get 8 tasks for my dual cores and 16 tasks for my dual core with HT.
29) Message boards : LHC@home Science : Dinamic Aperure studies: ready to go! (Message 25486) Posted 14 Mar 2013 by Uffe F Post: They are also starting to pour in here now. Got 32 wu's now :)
30) Message boards : News : Interruption for server update (Message 25483) Posted 13 Mar 2013 by Uffe F Post: How long do you expect it to take to check the software chain? Can we expect Work in a few days or weeks?
31) Message boards : LHC@home Science : Dinamic Aperure studies: ready to go! (Message 25477) Posted 10 Mar 2013 by Uffe F Post: They are all ready to go whenever you submit Work :)
32) Message boards : News : Interruption for server update (Message 25476) Posted 10 Mar 2013 by Uffe F Post: Sounds good with more Work. Keep up the good Work you are doing :)
33) Message boards : Number crunching : 13-14 Feb 2012 - WU restart - but some short-lived (Message 25460) Posted 26 Feb 2013 by Uffe F Post: By the way, some work started trickeling in again. So Eric might be done now.
34) Message boards : Number crunching : Inconsistent Report Deadline dates (bug or feature?) (Message 24861) Posted 22 Sep 2012 by Uffe F Post: Well, I think it might be specific for the project. Since I just checked collatz, and there it shows the same date as on my computer. So it is a LHC thing. Thats just my 2 cents.
35) Message boards : Number crunching : Days of work (Message 24853) Posted 18 Sep 2012 by Uffe F Post: This is a project specific thing. Atleast for LHC. You are only allowed to have 4 tasks per core "in progress". So thats why you can't get work for 2x10 days. Besides, the work deadline for LHC is 7 days, so if you request 20 days (10 day buffer and 10 additional), then you will fail to do 13 days of work, which will just get thrown out. This is one of the reasons there is this limit. This project is build for small answer times and low cache. So the computers that are not online atleast every 6 days, will not be able to participate in this project. The rest of your computers are appreciated a lot though.
36) Message boards : Number crunching : Inconsistent Report Deadline dates (bug or feature?) (Message 24847) Posted 17 Sep 2012 by Uffe F Post: I have the same "problem". All my deadlines on the webpage are one day later than on my computers. (they are also additional 2 hours apart, but that is because I am in UTC+2 timezone, so that is perfectly normal).
37) Message boards : Number crunching : Credits (Message 24838) Posted 14 Sep 2012 by Uffe F Post: I wish I had as high a credit as you Tom. ;-) I get 0.84! http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/workunit.php?wuid=3208867 But the task is only 108-141 seconds long. so that is like 1½-2½ minute long. You shouldn't get more credit than 0.84. The credit only comes from CPU time, not run time. Run time is just the time it was running on your system. But if you play games, watch movies or stuff like that, then your CPU time will be a lot less than your run time, since the CPU is only running at a few percentages of what it can do. Here is a normal workunit of mine that gave 139 credit for 5 hours of work. And it gave even mor credit per hour for my wingman as he completed it faster. http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/workunit.php?wuid=3149580
38) Message boards : Number crunching : Credits (Message 24837) Posted 14 Sep 2012 by Uffe F Post: I wish I had as high a credit as you Tom. ;-) I get 0.84! http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/workunit.php?wuid=3208867 But the task is only 108-141 seconds long. so that is like 1½-2½ minute long. You shouldn't get more credit than 0.84. The credit only comes from CPU time, not run time. Run time is just the time it was running on your system. But if you play games, watch movies or stuff like that, then your CPU time will be a lot less than your run time, since the CPU is only running at a few percentages of what it can do. Here is a normal workunit of mine that gave 139 credit for 5 hours of work. And it gave even mor credit per hour for my wingman as he completed it faster. http://lhcathomeclassic.cern.ch/sixtrack/workunit.php?wuid=3149580
39) Message boards : Number crunching : WU not being resent to another user (Message 24801) Posted 8 Sep 2012 by Uffe F Post: I got 6 wlxu2, 2 of them is 7 hours, 2 of them is 61 hours and 2 of them is 76 hours. It's not a problem, because I can easely do them in time, was just so you know that there are some out there. They are not resends. 3121879 short 3123215 long 3123328 long 3123629 long 3125320 short 3125798 long I don't know where to look for turns, but i can se the estimated computation sizes: 180000 GFLOPs 1800000 GFLOPs The reason there is 3 different estimated times are because of sse2, sse3 and pni jobs dont have the same estimation.
40) Message boards : Number crunching : WU not being resent to another user (Message 24798) Posted 8 Sep 2012 by Uffe F Post: I just got a few wlxu2 on my computer, so it seems that there are still some fresh long ones in the queue.

Previous 20 · Next 20

LHC@home