21) Message boards : Number crunching : A Birthday Wish (Message 16784)
Posted 30 Apr 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
I haven't had stats exported from this project since my last birthday. I know it sounds trivial, but if the project admins want to give me something for my birthday, all I want is to have my stats by then. I was born on June 1st, The Day of the Popular Eye. It's also Marilyn Monroe's birthday.

I know that only gives you a month to get it all figured out, but... That's what I want for my birthday.

Thanks.
22) Message boards : Number crunching : Unable to connect to database - please try again later Error: 1040Too many connections (Message 16759)
Posted 29 Apr 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
These are a real pain when you are trying to use the message boards. Is everyone else getting the same and is anything being done to correct it?


I get the same error when trying to access the site sometimes, but... ?
23) Message boards : Number crunching : Gone in a flash! (Message 16752)
Posted 28 Apr 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
Did anyone clock how fast those 13500 work units were snapped up? I got ONE, and by the time it had run for 15 minutes there was no more work (of course, my WU may not have started right away because I crunch for other projects.)

Well anyway, hooray for the drizzle after the drought!




I wonder why I was given 13,410 of them?

Oh well... I have work >:P
24) Message boards : Number crunching : XTreme Labs might have the stats solution? (Message 16729)
Posted 21 Apr 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
(copied from the main page)

Merging duplicated hosts
Sometimes, when the Boinc client is reinstalled or upgraded, the same machine may be duplicated in our database. We have two or more different records in the database for the same physical host. A bug in our server also have duplicated many hosts. (This bug have been fixed)

We have executed a script to automatically merge hosts. Hosts have been merged only if they have got exactly the same characteristics, the same owner, times do not overlaps, and the removed host has not been active for a long time period.

25) Message boards : Number crunching : Migration (Message 16662)
Posted 4 Apr 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
30 days now and no update, so.. I guess I'll be the first to ask..

Migrating - How's it comin?

Give up yet? lol
26) Message boards : Number crunching : I will never get my stats exported from this project :( (Message 16599)
Posted 22 Mar 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
im pretty sure he was being facetious :)


Lol yes.. It was an apparrently vain attempt at throwing some lightheartedness at that poor.. abused and neglected horse. I'm suprised it's still alive down there on the floor..

*kicks horse*


It is in vain, sir, to extenuate the matter. Gentlemen may cry, Credit, Credit--but there are no credits. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or credit so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? I know not what course others may take; but as for me, GIVE ME CREDITS OR GIVE ME DEATH!
27) Message boards : Number crunching : I will never get my stats exported from this project :( (Message 16586)
Posted 21 Mar 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
But it's ok!

It's not like it'll matter anyway when the LHC comes online and creates a negatively charged metastable strangelet and reduces the earth to a clump of strange matter roughly the size of a basketball court.

CRUNCH ON!
28) Message boards : Number crunching : Fairer distribuiton of work(Flame Fest 2007) (Message 16581)
Posted 19 Mar 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
Then I read some more I laughed so hard I farted, and that made me laugh harder!


Mercy. I hope this is supposed to be harshly sarcastic. If you really see eye to eye with the "k00k" rhetoric, I hope your next fart backfires.



I do believe that the people who say 'I feel so helpless that I cannot crunch' are, well.. a little k00k-y.. but.. I would never say it with such flair for the offensive.
29) Message boards : Number crunching : Fairer distribuiton of work(Flame Fest 2007) (Message 16578)
Posted 18 Mar 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
Yes, it is important to let k00ks know they are k00ks. Otherwise they continue posting their k00k crap. Their nonsense is annoying, antagonising and insulting. It breaks all the rules.
......

The problem? WHAT problem? It is NOT a problem if he doesn't get WUs. NOBODY INCLUDING THE ADMINS give a rusty rat's ass if he doesn't get WUs or whether he feels helpless/happy/hopeful/hungry. The fact he thinks they should care proves he's a k00k.


Oh god.. that made me laugh so hard I cried. Then I read some more I laughed so hard I farted, and that made me laugh harder!

oh god.. whew... thanks for that one. Glad we see eye to eye!
30) Message boards : Number crunching : Fairer distribuiton of work(Flame Fest 2007) (Message 16577)
Posted 18 Mar 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
I run a number of other projects, and periodically check this project to find out if work is available. I have seen a pattern repeating. I visit the website. No work available. Then for a couple days I see unable to connect to the database - too many users. I interpret this to mean there's work but I'm too late - the servers are busy distributing work to the lucky few. Then no work available again. Maybe it's time for me to give up on this project.


BYE!
31) Message boards : Number crunching : Fairer distribuiton of work(Flame Fest 2007) (Message 16499)
Posted 9 Mar 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
Can we get this damn thread deleted or something?

It's about the worst waste of digital space and time spent debating I've seen in a long time.
32) Message boards : Number crunching : Fairer distribuiton of work(Flame Fest 2007) (Message 16423)
Posted 27 Feb 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:

Readed that by accident now.
Well, I'm not posting much on most of the projects, but I still read most of the threads on that ones who interests me the most.
LHC is one of my favorite (see sig) and I'm reading here from time to time to being up to date, although I'm not posting that much here.
But that's no reason to say to me I would have nothing to say here.
And deciding for credibility on what you crunched for the projects or by the amount of posts is not really professional in my opinion.
I love BOINCing and crunching and because of that I'm participating in all projects, although I only have one computer (this will change soon btw and then I can crunch more ;-)).
And last but not least I have a special project where I do post the most: RenderFarm.

I hope you understand MY SPIRIT of BOINCing now a bit better ;-)


You're posting in a thread about how people are supposed to be getting 'their fair share' of credits out of the project.

I'm sorry, but I don't think you are capable of quantifying a fair 'need' for work from *any* project, when you have one computer almost equally attached to 40 of them. If you're not getting your 'fair share' then get another computer and attach to less projects.

I can't believe that you would INNOCENTLY sit there and tell me that my computers need to be limited so that your *single* computer can get it's 3 alotted work units whenever it manages to find LHC in the other 35+ projects you have the poor thing attached to.

Regardless, - It's not about fairer distribution of work. If you don't get work, TOO BAD. It's not about who gets work, it's about how fast that work gets turned around to the project and we all need to be a little less greedy and think about what's important here - Getting the work back to the server as quick as possible. - NOT making sure everyone gets 3.654 workunits each time(and nothing more, nothing less). That causes so many problems on so many levels.. I don't know where to begin. Leave the system AS-IS. The new admin's have WAY too many things to do as it is.
33) Message boards : Cafe LHC : dial-up participation (Message 16406)
Posted 25 Feb 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
Gentlemen: After a number of near-misses at obtaining a WU, I can only conclude that those whose computers are always on-line will always co-opt those
of us who are in a dial-up configuration (for other
valid reasons, eg, children in college).

Would it be possible for the good administrators at
LHC to keep a few WU's in abeyance, as a good-will
gesture? I am aware that the flood-gates will open,
when the project becomes 100% operational; however,
for old-time's sake . . .

Thanks/danke schon (sans umlaut),

Jim M.


No.

Dial up users should use another project if they can't seem to sign on when the project has work.

We're not going to hold back science progressing on the Collider just because we want to secure some work for the one or two dial up people who can't seem to figure out how to get out of the stone age.
34) Message boards : Number crunching : Fairer distribuiton of work(Flame Fest 2007) (Message 16405)
Posted 25 Feb 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
ok... DoctorNow..

How do you expect to have credibility when you have the kind of credit you have spread over 40 projects?

Is that a joke?

Not being flamatory, I simply cannot understand how you feel you have contributed *anything* to any one of your projects, even though your total contribution is at least noteworthy.

Difference of opinion I guess, but I would like to think that you could find a project you like enough to actually give them something worthwhile.
35) Message boards : Number crunching : Because you asked.... (Message 16368)
Posted 18 Feb 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:

This is our current To Do List:
* Database backup and restore
* Server backup
* Get test system working

* Find and compile and test:
- Transitioner
- Validator
- Assimilator
- File deleter

* Ensure e-mail is working properly
* Test migrate
* Real migration
* Solve any other problems that come up!

Cheers,
Neasan and Alex.


Hmm ok..

So that's a pretty large 'To-Do' list.

What's been done already? Anything?
36) Message boards : Number crunching : LHC credits not showing up in cross-project stats (Message 16336)
Posted 14 Feb 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:

Than add also a reason. =)
"because of migration the stats are currently not available at the moment and we will inform you when they are back" or something like this.

just an idea :)


Done and done


Where is my pony? :*(
37) Message boards : Number crunching : @ new admins (Message 16279)
Posted 8 Feb 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
To be honest (and don't hold me to this) within a fortnight* we believe ... all your problems will be solved

* This is going to come back and bite me in the ass isn't it :-/



OMG!!!! I AM GOING TO GET A PONY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I WANT A PONY!

38) Message boards : Number crunching : /stats/ empty (Message 15965)
Posted 2 Jan 2007 by Aaron Finney
Post:
[quote]

Have a great Christmas and "see" you in the new year!

Alex Owen


Sorry for the silence so far, we'll rectify that in the new year.

Later Days,
Neasan.


HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!!!!!!!!

Where's my stats? lol
39) Message boards : Number crunching : Chrulle, any news on database recovery? (Message 12639)
Posted 5 Feb 2006 by Aaron Finney
Post:
Yeah but coppers pretty "soft" having a melting point just BARELY above gold, which as we know is pretty easy to melt.

What about molybdenum or tungsten?
40) Message boards : LHC@home Science : ADMIN : What about a negatively charged strangelet? (Message 12100)
Posted 17 Jan 2006 by Aaron Finney
Post:

Because it doesn't matter. We all die sooner or later.


Well, I mean.. I'm all for designing the LHC, (so long as it doesn't destroy us), and I'm sure that they have a logical reason for deciding to go ahead with it, but couldn't we get a professional answer from the physicist guys as to what they think about this?

Why can't we build the LHC or VLHC on mars or the moon?


Previous 20 · Next 20


©2024 CERN